Differential brain response to one- or two-hand handling action: an fMRI study

Correspondence: Keiko Tagai 2-2-1, Hayabuchi, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 224-8558, Japan Email keiko.tagai@to.shiseido.co.jp Abstract: In interpersonal communication, body posture and actions serve as important channels for transmitting social signals, which often vary among cultures and possess functional and affective elements. In Asian cultures, it tends to be commonly considered that handing an object with two hands is more polite than using only one hand. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined whether an individual handing an object with one versus two hands would produce differential brain activity in the receiver. Thirteen participants observed 10 second movie clips in which a model moved an object using either two hands or one hand and the perceived politeness of each action was evaluated. In the control condition, two static images of the first and last frames of a movie were presented. Results showed that ratings of politeness were significantly higher for actions involving two hands compared to one hand. Significant fMRI signal changes were found in the bilateral occipital lobe in both the two-handed and one-handed conditions relative to the control condition. Compared to the use of one hand, observing an action involving two hands was associated with a higher politeness rating and increased activation in the inferior frontal gyrus. These results suggest that activation in the bilateral occipital lobe is involved in the processing of hand actions and the inferior frontal gyrus is associated with interpersonal cognition.

[1]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Brain regions involved in human movement perception: A quantitative voxel‐based meta‐analysis , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[2]  S. Liew,et al.  Familiarity modulates mirror neuron and mentalizing regions during intention understanding , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Osman M. Karatepe Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: The Moderating Role of Gender , 2011 .

[4]  Toshio Inui,et al.  Understanding interpersonal action coordination: an fMRI study , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  Leonardo Fogassi,et al.  Anterior intraparietal cortex codes complexity of observed hand movements , 2010, Brain Research Bulletin.

[7]  Raymond H. Cuijpers,et al.  The role of inferior frontal and parietal areas in differentiating meaningful and meaningless object-directed actions , 2010, Brain Research.

[8]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evidence of Mirror Neurons in Human Inferior Frontal Gyrus , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Schubotz,et al.  The Case of Pretense: Observing Actions and Inferring Goals , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Eugene Tunik,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Frontal Operculum and Supramarginal Gyrus Disrupts Planning of Outcome-Based Hand–Object Interactions , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Alex Martin,et al.  Grounding Object Concepts in Perception and Action: Evidence from FMRI Studies of Tools , 2007, Cortex.

[13]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[14]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Neural systems underlying observation of humanly impossible movements: an FMRI study. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  G. Orban,et al.  Specificity of regions processing biological motion , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[18]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[19]  D Yves von Cramon,et al.  Sequences of Abstract Nonbiological Stimuli Share Ventral Premotor Cortex with Action Observation and Imagery , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  U. Yavas,et al.  Relationships between service quality and behavioral outcomes , 2004 .

[21]  D Yves von Cramon,et al.  Premotor cortex in observing erroneous action: an fMRI study. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  G. Orban,et al.  Motion-responsive regions of the human brain , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[27]  B. Baars,et al.  Social cognition: Perceiving the mental states of others , 2010 .

[28]  D. Griffith,et al.  Drivers of local merchant loyalty: Understanding the influence of gender and shopping motives , 2006 .

[29]  池上 英子,et al.  Bonds of civility : aesthetic networks and the political origins of Japanese culture , 2005 .

[30]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior in Interpersonal Relations , 1987 .

[31]  V. Gallese Please Scroll down for Article Social Neuroscience Mirror Neurons and the Social Nature of Language: the Neural Exploitation Hypothesis Mirror Neurons and the Social Nature of Language: the Neural Exploitation Hypothesis , 2022 .