An experimental robotic testbed for accelerated development of ankle prostheses

Biomechatronic devices show promise for restoring human performance, but development has been made inefficient by the need for specialized autonomous devices prior to testing benefits of proposed functionalities. This has severely limited exploration within and across intervention strategies. We have developed a laboratory testbed suitable for emulating and rapidly assessing wearable robot designs. The testbed is comprised of powerful off-board motor and control hardware, a flexible tether, and lightweight instrumented end-effectors worn by a person. We performed a series of benchtop tests to gauge mechatronic performance, and found significant improvements over prior candidate testbed platforms. In particular, this system has an unusual combination of low worn mass (less than 1 kg), high closed-loop torque bandwidth (17 Hz), and high peak torque (175 N·m), key to emulating specialized devices. We also performed walking trials to gauge dynamic torque control and versatility. Walking trials with a prosthesis end-effector demonstrated precise torque tracking (4 N·m RMS error), both in time and joint-angle space, and versatile mechanical behavior through systematic changes in high-level control law parameters. For example, we widely varied net ankle work (from -3 J to 9 J per step) using an impedance law relating joint angle and velocity to desired torque. These results suggest such testbeds could be used to emulate and evaluate novel assistive robot concepts prior to laborious product design.

[1]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Oscillation of the human ankle joint in response to applied sinusoidal torque on the foot , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  R W Mann,et al.  An electrohydraulic knee-torque controller for a prosthesis simulator. , 1977, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  J B King,et al.  Gait Analysis. An Introduction , 1992 .

[4]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[5]  L. M. Sheldahl,et al.  Physiological comparison of walking among bilateral above-knee amputee and able-bodied subjects, and a model to account for the differences in metabolic cost. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  R. Waters,et al.  The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. , 1999, Gait & posture.

[7]  Benjamin T. Krupp,et al.  Series elastic actuators for high fidelity force control , 2002 .

[8]  Jerry E. Pratt,et al.  The RoboKnee: an exoskeleton for enhancing strength and endurance during walking , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[9]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Mechanical performance of artificial pneumatic muscles to power an ankle-foot orthosis. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Gordon Wyeth,et al.  Control issues for velocity sourced series elastic actuators , 2006 .

[11]  S. Collins,et al.  The advantages of a rolling foot in human walking , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  J. Veneman Design and evaluation of the gait rehabilitation robot LOPES , 2007 .

[13]  S.K. Au,et al.  Biomechanical Design of a Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[14]  R. Kram,et al.  The effects of adding mass to the legs on the energetics and biomechanics of walking. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Mechanics and energetics of level walking with powered ankle exoskeletons , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  M. Noel,et al.  An ElectroHydraulic Actuated Ankle Foot Orthosis to Generate Force Fields and to Test Proprioceptive Reflexes During Human Walking , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Andre Schiele Performance difference of Bowden Cable relocated and non-relocated master actuators in virtual environment applications , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  Thomas Sugar,et al.  Robotic transtibial prosthesis with biomechanical energy regeneration , 2009, Ind. Robot.

[20]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Self-contained powered knee and ankle prosthesis: Initial evaluation on a transfemoral amputee , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[21]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Novel Robot for Ankle Rehabilitation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[22]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  A Highly Backdrivable, Lightweight Knee Actuator for Investigating Gait in Stroke , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[23]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[24]  S. Collins,et al.  Recycling Energy to Restore Impaired Ankle Function during Human Walking , 2010, PloS one.

[25]  S. Collins,et al.  Systematic variation of prosthetic foot parameter affects 1 center-of-mass mechanics and metabolic cost during walking 2 3 4 , 2010 .

[26]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Design of a Rotational Hydroelastic Actuator for a Powered Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Alena M. Grabowski,et al.  Bionic ankle–foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  S. Collins,et al.  The effect of prosthetic foot push-off on mechanical loading associated with knee osteoarthritis in lower extremity amputees. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[29]  S. Collins,et al.  Systematic Variation of Prosthetic Foot Spring Affects Center-of-Mass Mechanics and Metabolic Cost During Walking , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[30]  S. Collins,et al.  The effects of a controlled energy storage and return prototype prosthetic foot on transtibial amputee ambulation. , 2012, Human movement science.

[31]  Daniel Vélez Día,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .