Being Bayesian: Discussions from the Perspectives of Stakeholders and Hydrologists

Bayes’ Theorem is gaining acceptance in hydrology, but it is still far from standard practice to cast hydrologic analyses in a Bayesian context—especially in the realm of hydrologic practice. Three short discussions are presented to encourage more complete adoption of a Bayesian approach. The first, aimed at a stakeholder audience, seeks to explain that an informal Bayesian analysis is the default approach that we all take to any decision made under uncertainty. The second, aimed at a general hydrologist audience, seeks to establish multi-model approaches as the natural choice for Bayesian hydrologic analysis. The goal of this discussion is to provide a bridge from the stakeholder’s natural approach to a more formal, quantitative Bayesian analysis. The third discussion is targeted to a more advanced hydrologist audience, suggesting that some elements of hydrologic practice do not yet reflect a Bayesian philosophy. In particular, an example is given that puts Bayes Theory to work to identify optimal observation sets before data are collected.

[1]  Eileen Poeter 'All models are wrong, how do we know which are useful?'--looking back at the 2006 Darcy Lecture Tour. , 2007, Ground water.

[2]  Gordon J MacMillan,et al.  Potential Use of Multimodels in Consulting to Improve Model Acceptance and Decision Making , 2017, Ground water.

[3]  J. Evans,et al.  Assessing the value of hydrogeologic information for risk‐based remedial action decisions , 1989 .

[5]  Helen Fillmore Using the Washoe Language to Inform Hydrologic and Environmental Models , 2017, Ground water.

[6]  Katie M Glodzik,et al.  Human Preferences and Belief Patterns Mimic Ecosystem Hysteresis , 2017, Ground water.

[7]  Jie Shi,et al.  Multi-objective modelling and decision support using a Bayesian network approximation to a non-point source pollution model , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Lucy Marshall,et al.  Creativity, Uncertainty, and Automated Model Building , 2017, Ground water.

[9]  John Doherty,et al.  Parameter and predictive outcomes of model simplification , 2013 .

[10]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  Bayesian model averaging to explore the worth of data for soil‐plant model selection and prediction , 2015 .

[11]  Daniel M. Tartakovsky,et al.  Assessment and management of risk in subsurface hydrology: A review and perspective , 2013 .

[12]  Bruce A. Robinson,et al.  Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: Comparison of sequential data assimilation and Bayesian model averaging , 2007 .

[13]  Randall J. Hunt,et al.  Debating complexity in modeling , 1999 .

[14]  J. Bredehoeft The conceptualization model problem—surprise , 2005 .

[15]  Thomas Hermans Prediction-Focused Approaches: An Opportunity for Hydrology. , 2017, Ground water.

[16]  A. Woodbury,et al.  Geostatistics and Bayesian Updating for Transmissivity Estimation in a Multiaquifer System in Manitoba, Canada , 2002, Ground water.

[17]  Ty P A Ferré,et al.  Revisiting the Relationship Between Data, Models, and Decision‐Making , 2017, Ground water.

[18]  J. Doherty Modeling: Picture Perfect or Abstract Art? , 2011, Ground water.

[19]  J. Vrugt,et al.  On the optimal design of experiments for conceptual and predictive discrimination of hydrologic system models , 2015 .

[20]  S. F. Mousavi,et al.  An approach to the design of experiments for discriminating among alternative conceptual models , 1992 .

[21]  T. Ulrych,et al.  Minimum relative entropy and probabilistic inversion in groundwater hydrology , 1998 .

[22]  Y. Rubin,et al.  A hypothesis‐driven approach to optimize field campaigns , 2012 .

[23]  N. Crossman,et al.  Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units , 2012 .

[24]  Anneli Guthke Defensible Model Complexity: A Call for Data-Based and Goal-Oriented Model Choice. , 2017, Ground water.

[25]  C. Kikuchi,et al.  Toward Increased Use of Data Worth Analyses in Groundwater Studies , 2017, Ground water.

[26]  George F. Pinder,et al.  Space‐time optimization of groundwater quality sampling networks , 2005 .

[27]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  Bayesian assessment of the expected data impact on prediction confidence in optimal sampling design , 2012 .

[28]  Keith Beven,et al.  Informal likelihood measures in model assessment: Theoretic development and investigation , 2008 .

[29]  R. Hunt,et al.  Are Models Too Simple? Arguments for Increased Parameterization , 2007, Ground water.

[30]  Randall J Hunt,et al.  Taking Account of “Unknown Unknowns” , 2010, Ground water.

[31]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Optimal design for problems involving flow and transport phenomena in saturated subsurface systems , 2002 .

[32]  Carl D. Shapiro,et al.  From data to decisions: Processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments , 2017 .

[33]  Jeremy T White,et al.  Forecast First: An Argument for Groundwater Modeling in Reverse , 2017, Ground water.

[34]  Catherine Moore,et al.  Role of model parameterization in risk-based decision support: An empirical exploration , 2019 .

[35]  William G. Hunter,et al.  Designs for Discriminating Between Two Rival Models , 1965 .

[36]  P. Samuelson A Note on Measurement of Utility , 1937 .

[37]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of uncertain model predictions , 2003 .

[38]  Guido Buzzi-Ferraris,et al.  A new sequential experimental design procedure for discriminating among rival models , 1983 .

[39]  H. Haitjema,et al.  The Role of Hand Calculations in Ground Water Flow Modeling , 2006, Ground water.

[40]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[41]  Frank T.-C. Tsai,et al.  Optimal observation network design for conceptual model discrimination and uncertainty reduction , 2016 .

[42]  William J. Hill,et al.  Discrimination Among Mechanistic Models , 1967 .

[43]  P. Womble Multimodel Groundwater Analysis in U.S. Courts: Potential Applications and Limitations , 2017, Ground water.

[44]  R. Freeze,et al.  The worth of data in predicting aquitard continuity in hydrogeological design , 1993 .

[45]  L. Feyen,et al.  Reliable groundwater management in hydroecologically sensitive areas , 2004 .

[46]  Frank T.-C. Tsai,et al.  Inverse groundwater modeling for hydraulic conductivity estimation using Bayesian model averaging and variance window , 2008 .

[47]  Yingqi Zhang,et al.  Least cost design of groundwater quality monitoring networks , 2005 .

[48]  L. Rosén,et al.  Comprehensive risk assessment of groundwater drawdown induced subsidence , 2019, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[49]  Luk J M Peeters,et al.  Assumption Hunting in Groundwater Modeling: Find Assumptions Before They Find You , 2017, Ground water.

[50]  Todd A Wang,et al.  The development and application of a multilevel decision analysis model for the remediation of contaminated groundwater under uncertainty. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[51]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Combining multiobjective optimization and Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles of soil hydraulic models , 2008 .

[52]  W. Yeh,et al.  Development of objective‐oriented groundwater models: 2. Robust experimental design , 2007 .

[53]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Value of Information as a Context-Specific Measure of Uncertainty in Groundwater Remediation , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[54]  Juan Carlos Castilla-Rho,et al.  Groundwater Modeling with Stakeholders: Finding the Complexity that Matters , 2017, Ground water.

[55]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Many‐objective groundwater monitoring network design using bias‐aware ensemble Kalman filtering, evolutionary optimization, and visual analytics , 2011 .

[56]  Joel Massmann,et al.  Hydrogeological Decision Analysis: 1. A Framework , 1990 .

[57]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[58]  John Doherty,et al.  Groundwater modelling in decision support: reflections on a unified conceptual framework , 2013, Hydrogeology Journal.

[59]  Steven M. Gorelick,et al.  Framework to evaluate the worth of hydraulic conductivity data for optimal groundwater resources management in ecologically sensitive areas , 2005 .

[60]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling , 2012 .

[61]  Peter Reichert,et al.  An Efficient Sampling Technique for Bayesian Inference With Computationally Demanding Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[62]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  A new epsilon-dominance hierarchical Bayesian optimization algorithm for large multiobjective monitoring network design problems , 2008 .

[63]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  A framework for development and application of hydrological models , 2001, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[64]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Multimodel Bayesian analysis of data-worth applied to unsaturated fractured tuffs , 2012 .

[65]  Clifford I. Voss,et al.  Discrimination among one‐dimensional models of solute transport in porous media: Implications for sampling design , 1988 .

[66]  Domenico Baù,et al.  Data-worth analysis for multiobjective optimal design of pump-and-treat remediation systems , 2007 .

[67]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved identifiability of hydrologic model parameters: The information content of experimental data , 2002 .

[68]  Andrew T Leaf,et al.  Using Models to Identify the Best Data: An Example from Northern Wisconsin , 2017, Ground water.

[69]  Y. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian geostatistical design: Task‐driven optimal site investigation when the geostatistical model is uncertain , 2010 .

[70]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Sampling Design Methods For Groundwater Modeling Under Uncertainty , 1995 .

[71]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  Entropy-Based Experimental Design for Optimal Model Discrimination in the Geosciences , 2016, Entropy.

[72]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  On model selection criteria in multimodel analysis , 2007 .

[73]  N. Plant,et al.  Bridging groundwater models and decision support with a Bayesian network , 2013 .

[74]  W. Nowak,et al.  Model selection on solid ground: Rigorous comparison of nine ways to evaluate Bayesian model evidence , 2014, Water resources research.

[75]  S. Gorelick,et al.  When enough is enough: The worth of monitoring data in aquifer remediation design , 1994 .

[76]  Philippe Renard,et al.  Prediction-Focused Subsurface Modeling: Investigating the Need for Accuracy in Flow-Based Inverse Modeling , 2015, Mathematical Geosciences.

[77]  Anne E. Jeton,et al.  Collaborative modelling and integrated decision support system analysis of a developed terminal lake basin , 2014 .

[78]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Bayesian analysis of data-worth considering model and parameter uncertainties , 2012 .

[79]  Dirk Mallants,et al.  Hydrogeological conceptual model building and testing: A review , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[80]  Leslie Smith,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to the quantification of the effect of model error on the predictions of groundwater models , 2001 .