Abnormal cortical processing of pattern motion in amblyopia: Evidence from fMRI

Converging evidence from human psychophysics and animal neurophysiology indicates that amblyopia is associated with abnormal function of area MT, a motion sensitive region of the extrastriate visual cortex. In this context, the recent finding that amblyopic eyes mediate normal perception of dynamic plaid stimuli was surprising, as neural processing and perception of plaids has been closely linked to MT function. One intriguing potential explanation for this discrepancy is that the amblyopic eye recruits alternative visual brain areas to support plaid perception. This is the hypothesis that we tested. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure the response of the amblyopic visual cortex and thalamus to incoherent and coherent motion of plaid stimuli that were perceived normally by the amblyopic eye. We found a different pattern of responses within the visual cortex when plaids were viewed by amblyopic as opposed to non-amblyopic eyes. The non-amblyopic eyes of amblyopes and control eyes differentially activated the hMT+ complex when viewing incoherent vs. coherent plaid motion, consistent with the notion that this region is centrally involved in plaid perception. However, for amblyopic eye viewing, hMT+ activation did not vary reliably with motion type. In a sub-set of our participants with amblyopia we were able to localize MT and MST within the larger hMT+ complex and found a lack of plaid motion selectivity in both sub-regions. The response of the pulvinar and ventral V3 to plaid stimuli also differed under amblyopic vs. non-amblyopic eye viewing conditions, however the response of these areas did vary according to motion type. These results indicate that while the perception of the plaid stimuli was constant for both amblyopic and non-amblyopic viewing, the network of neural areas that supported this perception was different.

[1]  R. Hess,et al.  On the relationship between pattern and movement perception in strabismic amblyopia , 1978, Vision Research.

[2]  T. Pasternak,et al.  Transient and permanent deficits in motion perception after lesions of cortical areas MT and MST in the macaque monkey. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  H. J. Tochon-Danguy,et al.  Second Order Components of Moving Plaids Activate Extrastriate Cortex: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1999, NeuroImage.

[4]  R F Hess,et al.  The cortical deficit in humans with strabismic amblyopia , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Distinguishing subregions of the human MT+ complex using visual fields and pursuit eye movements. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Hess,et al.  The amblyopic deficit and its relationship to geniculo-cortical processing streams. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  W. Singer,et al.  Ocular dominance in extrastriate cortex of strabismic amblyopic cats , 2002, Vision Research.

[9]  J. Movshon,et al.  Motion Integration by Neurons in Macaque MT Is Local, Not Global , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Lotfi B. Merabet,et al.  Motion integration in a thalamic visual nucleus , 1998, Nature.

[12]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Dynamic properties of neurons in cortical area MT in alert and anaesthetized macaque monkeys , 2001, Nature.

[13]  W. Merigan,et al.  Motion perception following lesions of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  R. Tootell,et al.  Anatomical evidence for MT and additional cortical visual areas in humans. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Functional imaging of the human lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  D. Hubel,et al.  Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification , 1977, Vision Research.

[19]  Lisa Koski,et al.  A double dissociation between striate and extrastriate visual cortex for pattern motion perception revealed using rTMS , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[21]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Pattern-motion responses in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Hess,et al.  Motion sensitivity and spatial undersampling in amblyopia , 1993, Vision Research.

[23]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  Plaid perception is only subtly impaired in strabismic amblyopia , 2008, Vision Research.

[24]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Impaired spatial and binocular summation for motion direction discrimination in strabismic amblyopia , 2011, Vision Research.

[25]  C W Clifford,et al.  Anomalous perception of coherence and transparency in moving plaid patterns. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Automatic volumetric segmentation of human visual retinotopic cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[27]  R. Sireteanu,et al.  Squint‐induced Modification of Visual Receptive Field in the Lateral Suprasylvian Cortex of the Cat: Binocul Interaction, Vertical Effect and Anomalous Correspondence , 1992, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[29]  A. T. Smith Coherence of plaids comprising components of disparate spatial frequencies , 1992, Vision Research.

[30]  Lynne Kiorpes,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying amblyopia , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[32]  Bruce C. Hansen,et al.  Selectivity as well as sensitivity loss characterizes the cortical spatial frequency deficit in amblyopia , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[33]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Understanding the Neural Basis of Amblyopia , 2004, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[34]  D. Heeger,et al.  Retinotopy and Functional Subdivision of Human Areas MT and MST , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  D. Maurer,et al.  Better perception of global motion after monocular than after binocular deprivation , 2002, Vision Research.

[36]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia , 2003, Vision Research.

[37]  William T. Newsome,et al.  Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction , 1990, Nature.

[38]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  The fidelity of the cortical retinotopic map in human amblyopia , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[39]  Nava Rubin,et al.  The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids , 2003, Vision Research.

[40]  Xingfeng Li,et al.  Effective connectivity anomalies in human amblyopia , 2011, NeuroImage.

[41]  D. Giaschi,et al.  Low- and high-level motion perception deficits in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia: Evidence from fMRI , 2009, Vision Research.

[42]  Timothy Ledgeway,et al.  Second-order optic flow deficits in amblyopia. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Pattern motion is present in V1 of awake but not anaesthetized monkeys , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[44]  J. Haselgrove,et al.  Decreased cortical activation in response to a motion stimulus in anisometropic amblyopic eyes using functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[45]  David Crewther,et al.  Strabismic amblyopia: Part 1: Psychophysics , 2000, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[46]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Multiple visual areas in the caudal superior temporal sulcus of the macaque , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[47]  J. Movshon,et al.  Sensitivity to visual motion in amblyopic macaque monkeys , 2006, Visual Neuroscience.

[48]  G. Orban,et al.  Size and shape of receptive fields in the medial superior temporal area (MST) of the macaque , 1997, Neuroreport.

[49]  David R Williams,et al.  Accommodation with higher-order monochromatic aberrations corrected with adaptive optics. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[50]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Activity patterns in human motion-sensitive areas depend on the interpretation of global motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  H. Rodman,et al.  Single-unit analysis of pattern-motion selective properties in the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Albert Gjedde,et al.  Separate neural pathways for contour and biological-motion cues in motion-defined animal shapes , 2003, NeuroImage.

[53]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  The global processing deficit in amblyopia involves noise segregation , 2006, Vision Research.

[54]  B. Mansouri,et al.  The extent of the dorsal extra-striate deficit in amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[55]  Catherine Boden,et al.  Deficient motion perception in the fellow eye of amblyopic children , 2005, Vision Research.

[56]  Albert Gjedde,et al.  Pattern–motion selectivity in the human pulvinar , 2005, NeuroImage.

[57]  D. Bradley,et al.  Structure and function of visual area MT. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[58]  Bruce C Hansen,et al.  Amblyopic perception of biological motion. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[59]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. I. Localization and visual properties of neurons. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The amblyopic deficit for global motion is spatial scale invariant , 2008, Vision Research.

[62]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[64]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  Integration of local motion is normal in amblyopia. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[65]  Adam Kohn,et al.  Visual Motion Processing by Neurons in Area MT of Macaque Monkeys with Experimental Amblyopia , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[66]  Robert F Hess,et al.  A residual deficit for global motion processing after acuity recovery in deprivation amblyopia. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[67]  D. Giaschi,et al.  Deficient maximum motion displacement in amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[68]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Sensitivity to optic flow in human cortical areas MT and MST , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[69]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[70]  M. Ptito,et al.  Activation of Human Extrageniculostriate Pathways after Damage to Area V1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[71]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in macaque area V3. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[72]  D. Hubel,et al.  The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[73]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[74]  Thomas D. Albright,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual motion coherence , 1992, Nature.

[75]  Serge O Dumoulin,et al.  Decreased gray matter concentration in the lateral geniculate nuclei in human amblyopes. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.