Increasing Interference Robustness of WiFi Fingerprinting by Leveraging Spectrum Information

RF-based indoor localization is constantly gaining popularity, and WiFi-based fingerprinting algorithms belong to the most promising candidates due to their well-known advantages. While it is known that RF interference can adversely influence the accuracy of those algorithms, it is still unclear if this effect could be efficiently mitigated. To this end, we demonstrate the impact and propose a procedure for reducing the influence of RF interference on WiFi beacon packets RSSI-based fingerprinting algorithms. The proposed procedure adjusts the RSSI measurements based on estimates of their variability caused by RF interference. For estimating the variability in RSSI measurements, the procedure leverages information about the spectrum power levels in the frequency band on which the fingerprinting algorithm performs. The proposed procedure can be inserted in the usual workflow of fingerprinting algorithms. We experimentally compared the performance of two well-known WiFi-based fingerprinting algorithms without and with the proposed interference mitigation procedure. Our experimental evaluation in different interference scenarios shows that the proposed procedure for mitigating the influence of RF interference significantly improves the localization accuracy, while it does not notably increase the latency of evaluated fingerprinting algorithms.

[1]  Maria Papadopouli,et al.  Low-dimensional signal-strength fingerprint-based positioning in wireless LANs , 2014, Ad Hoc Networks.

[2]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Infrastructure for benchmarking RF-based indoor localization under controlled interference , 2014, 2014 Ubiquitous Positioning Indoor Navigation and Location Based Service (UPINLBS).

[3]  Hüseyin Arslan,et al.  A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Web-based platform for evaluation of RF-based indoor localization algorithms , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW).

[5]  David Wetherall,et al.  Tool release: gathering 802.11n traces with channel state information , 2011, CCRV.

[6]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Experimental evaluation of RF-based indoor localization algorithms under RF interference , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Location and GNSS (ICL-GNSS).

[7]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Experimental Study of the Impact of WLAN Interference on IEEE 802.15.4 Body Area Networks , 2009, EWSN.

[8]  Adam Wolisz,et al.  Interference Effect on Localization Solutions: Signal Feature Perspective , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[9]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[10]  Ingrid Moerman,et al.  The EVARILOS Benchmarking Handbook: Evaluation of RF-based Indoor Localization Solutions , 2013 .

[11]  Hao Wang,et al.  A wireless LAN-based indoor positioning technology , 2004, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[12]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Experimental decomposition of the performance of fingerprinting-based localization algorithms , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[13]  Masayuki Murata,et al.  Indoor Localization System using RSSI Measurement of Wireless Sensor Network based on ZigBee Standard , 2006, Wireless and Optical Communications.

[14]  Te-Yuan Huang,et al.  A measurement study of zigbee-based indoor localization systems under RF interference , 2009, WINTECH '09.

[15]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[16]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing - The Sparse Way, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[17]  F. Ricciato,et al.  The myth of non-overlapping channels: interference measurements in IEEE 802.11 , 2007, 2007 Fourth Annual Conference on Wireless on Demand Network Systems and Services.

[18]  Simo Ali-Löytty,et al.  A comparative survey of WLAN location fingerprinting methods , 2009, 2009 6th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication.

[19]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Location-based services , 2008, CACM.

[20]  Upkar Varshney,et al.  Mobile and Wireless Networks , 2000 .

[21]  Filip Lemic Benchmarking of Quantile-based Indoor Fingerprinting Algorithm , 2014 .

[22]  Hakima Chaouchi,et al.  RFID-assisted indoor localization and the impact of interference on its performance , 2011, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[23]  Pedro Malagón,et al.  Connectivity Brokerage — Enabling Seamless Cooperation in Wireless Networks , 2010 .

[24]  Venkata N. Padmanabhan,et al.  Indoor localization without the pain , 2010, MobiCom.