Chameleon: Survey-Free Updating of a Fingerprint Database for Indoor Localization

In fingerprint-based indoor localization, keeping fingerprints current is important for localization accuracy. Because access point (AP) signals can change over time or suddenly, the traditional approach is to survey the site regularly and frequently, which is laborious and costly. The authors propose Chameleon, a novel survey-free approach to localize users and maintain an updated fingerprint database despite fingerprint signal changes. In Chameleon, clients are both location "queriers" and unconscious "surveyors" (implicit crowdsourcing). Independent of and amenable to any fingerprint-based localization algorithm, Chameleon employs a clustering algorithm to filter out the altered AP signals to achieve high localization accuracy. Using the calculated location and the collected signals of the client, the fingerprint database can be continuously updated without manual intervention. Extensive experimental trials at The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and at the Hong Kong International Airport confirm that Chameleon can adapt the radio map to the current signal environment and achieve low localization error despite signal changes.

[1]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[2]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[3]  Ravi Jain,et al.  Error characteristics and calibration-free techniques for wireless LAN-based location estimation , 2004, MobiWac '04.

[4]  Prathima Agrawal,et al.  ARIADNE: a dynamic indoor signal map construction and localization system , 2006, MobiSys '06.

[5]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[6]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  The Horus location determination system , 2008 .

[7]  Venkata N. Padmanabhan,et al.  Indoor localization without the pain , 2010, MobiCom.

[8]  Haiyun Luo,et al.  Zero-configuration indoor localization over IEEE 802.11 wireless infrastructure , 2010, Wirel. Networks.

[9]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Precise indoor localization using smart phones , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[10]  Seth J. Teller,et al.  Growing an organic indoor location system , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[11]  Anshul Rai,et al.  Zee: zero-effort crowdsourcing for indoor localization , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[12]  Shahrokh Valaee,et al.  Received-Signal-Strength-Based Indoor Positioning Using Compressive Sensing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[13]  Maurizio Bocca,et al.  Follow @grandma: Long-term device-free localization for residential monitoring , 2012, 37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks - Workshops.

[14]  Jun Li,et al.  Towards robust device-free passive localization through automatic camera-assisted recalibration , 2012, SenSys '12.

[15]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  No need to war-drive: unsupervised indoor localization , 2012, MobiSys '12.

[16]  Guobin Shen,et al.  Walkie-Markie: Indoor Pathway Mapping Made Easy , 2013, NSDI.

[17]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  WILL: Wireless indoor localization without site survey , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[18]  Gi-Wan Yoon,et al.  Building a Practical Wi-Fi-Based Indoor Navigation System , 2014, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[19]  Tin Kam Ho,et al.  Probabilistic radio-frequency fingerprinting and localization on the run , 2014, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[20]  Cheng Li,et al.  Cosine similarity based fingerprinting algorithm in WLAN indoor positioning against device diversity , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[21]  Peter Kulchyski and , 2015 .

[22]  Shueng-Han Gary Chan,et al.  Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning: Recent Advances and Comparisons , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.