Neural images of pursuit targets in the photoreceptor arrays of male and female houseflies Musca domestica

SUMMARY Male houseflies use a sex-specific frontal eye region, the lovespot, to detect and pursue mates. We recorded the electrical responses of photoreceptors to optical stimuli that simulate the signals received by a male or female photoreceptor as a conspecific passes through its field of view. We analysed the ability of male and female frontal photoreceptors to code conspecifics over the range of speeds and distances encountered during pursuit, and reconstructed the neural images of these targets in photoreceptor arrays. A male's lovespot photoreceptor detects a conspecific at twice the distance of a female photoreceptor, largely through better optics. This detection distance greatly exceeds those reported in previous behavioural studies. Lovespot photoreceptors respond more strongly than female photoreceptors to targets tracked during pursuit, with amplitudes reaching 25 mV. The male photoreceptor also has a faster response, exhibits a unique preference for stimuli of 20-30 ms duration that selects for conspecifics and deblurs moving images with response transients. White-noise analysis substantially underestimates these improvements. We conclude that in the lovespot, both optics and phototransduction are specialised to enhance and deblur the neural images of moving targets, and propose that analogous mechanisms may sharpen the neural image still further as it is transferred to visual interneurones.

[1]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Information theoretical evaluation of parametric models of gain control in blowfly photoreceptor cells , 2001, Vision Research.

[2]  A S French,et al.  Visual acuity for moving objects in first- and second-order neurons of the fly compound eye. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  H. Davidowitz,et al.  Insect perception: Do cockroaches ‘know’ about fluid dynamics? , 2000, Nature.

[4]  R. Hardie,et al.  Three classes of potassium channels in large monopolar cells of the blowfly Calliphora vicina , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  D. M. Guthrie Neuroethology: Nerve Cells and the Natural Behavior of Animals, Jeffrey M. Camhi. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. (1984), xv, +416. Price £24.00 , 1984 .

[6]  Pamela Reinagel How do visual neurons respond in the real world? , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  H. Wagner Flight performance and visual control of flight of the free-flying housefly (Musca domestica L.) II. Pursuit of targets , 1986 .

[8]  V. Hateren,et al.  Processing of natural time series of intensities by the visual system of the blowfly , 1997, Vision Research.

[9]  C. Wehrhahn,et al.  Sex-specific differences in the chasing behaviour of houseflies (Musca) , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Analysis of Physiological Systems , 1978, Computers in Biology and Medicine.

[11]  S B Laughlin,et al.  Variations in photoreceptor response dynamics across the fly retina. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Land Visual acuity in insects. , 1997, Annual review of entomology.

[13]  Joseph J. Atick,et al.  What Does the Retina Know about Natural Scenes? , 1992, Neural Computation.

[14]  J. A. Coles,et al.  Amplification of small signals by voltage-gated sodium channels in drone photoreceptors , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  S B Laughlin,et al.  Synaptic limitations to contrast coding in the retina of the blowfly Calliphora , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[16]  R. Wehner ‘Matched filters’ — neural models of the external world , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  Hateren,et al.  Blowfly flight and optic flow. I. Thorax kinematics and flight dynamics , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  T. Cronin,et al.  Tuning of photoreceptor spectral sensitivity in fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  A S French,et al.  The linear dynamic properties of phototransduction in the fly compound eye. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  M. F. Land,et al.  Maps of the acute zones of fly eyes , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  M Järvilehto,et al.  Contrast gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and linearity in light-adapted blowfly photoreceptors , 1994, The Journal of general physiology.

[22]  A. Snyder Physics of Vision in Compound Eyes , 1979 .

[23]  F. Newell Information Processing in the Visual Systems of Arthropods , 1973 .

[24]  J. A. Coles,et al.  The perception of small objects by the drone honeybee , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[25]  Simon B. Laughlin,et al.  Presynaptic enhancement of signal transients in photoreceptor terminals in the compound eye , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  S. M. Wu,et al.  A quantitative analysis of interactions between photoreceptors in the salamander (Ambystoma) retina. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  H. Wagner Flight Performance and Visual Control of Flight of the Free-Flying Housefly (Musca Domestica L.) I. Organization of the Flight Motor , 1986 .

[28]  T. Collett,et al.  Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[29]  D. G. Stavenga,et al.  Angular sensitivity of blowfly photoreceptors: broadening by artificial electrical coupling , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  Gary D. Bernard,et al.  The pursuit response of the housefly and its interaction with the optomotor response , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[31]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[32]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  S. Laughlin A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[34]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[35]  Gary D. Bernard,et al.  The effect of motion on visual acuity of the compound eye: A theoretical analysis , 1975, Vision Research.

[36]  S. B. Laughlin,et al.  Sexual dimorphism matches photoreceptor performance to behavioural requirements , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Michael J Morgan,et al.  Linear mechanisms can produce motion sharpening , 2001, Vision Research.

[38]  T. Collett,et al.  How hoverflies compute interception courses , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[39]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[40]  J. Zeil,et al.  Eyes, eye stalks and the visual world of semi-terrestrial crabs , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[41]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Tracking and chasing in houseflies (Musca) , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[42]  R. O. Uusitalo,et al.  Graded responses and spiking properties of identified first-order visual interneurons of the fly compound eye. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Theoretical predictions of spatiotemporal receptive fields of fly LMCs, and experimental validation , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[44]  Roger C. Hardie,et al.  Electrophysiological analysis of fly retina. I: Comparative properties of R1-6 and R 7 and 8 , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[45]  R. Thornhill Sexual selection within mating swarms of the lovebug, Plecia nearctica (Diptera: Bibionidae) , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  Christian Wehrhahn,et al.  How is tracking and fixation accomplished in the nervous system of the fly? , 1980, Biological Cybernetics.

[47]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Motion blur and motion sharpening: temporal smear and local contrast non-linearity , 1998, Vision Research.

[48]  V. Braitenberg Periodic structures and structural gradients in the visual ganglia of the fly , 1972 .

[49]  J. Lythgoe The Ecology of vision , 1979 .