Humans predict liquid dynamics using probabilistic simulation

Liquids can splash, squirt, gush, slosh, soak, drip, drain, trickle, pool, and be poured–complex behaviors that we can easily distinguish, imagine, describe, and, crucially, predict, despite tremendous diversity among different liquids’ material and dynamical characteristics. This proficiency suggests the brain has a sophisticated cognitive mechanism for reasoning about liquids, yet to date there has been little effort to study this mechanism quantitatively or describe it computationally. Here we find evidence that people’s reasoning about how liquids move is consistent with a computational cognitive model based on approximate probabilistic simulation. In a psychophysical experiment, participants predicted how different liquids would flow around solid obstacles, and their judgments agreed with those of a family of models in which volumes of liquid are represented as collections of interacting particles, within a dynamical fluid simulation. Our model explains people’s accuracy, and their predictions’ sensitivity to liquids of different viscosity. We also explored several models that did not involve simulation, and found they could not account for the experimental data as well. Our results are consistent with previous reports that people’s physical understanding of solid objects is based on simulation, but extends this thesis to the more complex and unexplored domain of reasoning about liquids.

[1]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Bernard Meltzer,et al.  Analogical Representations of Naive Physics , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[3]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[4]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Qualitative Mental Models: Simulations or Memories? , 1997 .

[5]  J. Monaghan Smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[6]  M. Hegarty Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  R. Schubotz Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.5 Prediction , 2022 .

[8]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[9]  Ernest Davis Pouring liquids: A study in commonsense physical reasoning , 2008, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Kenneth D. Forbus Handbook of Knowledge Representation Edited Qualitative Modeling , 2022 .

[11]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Five-Month-Old Infants Have Different Expectations for Solids and Liquids , 2022 .

[12]  Kenneth D. Forbus Qualitative modeling. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[13]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Noisy Newtons: Unifying process and dependency accounts of causal attribution , 2012, CogSci.

[14]  Kevin A. Smith,et al.  Sources of uncertainty in intuitive physics , 2012, CogSci.

[15]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[16]  Jessica B. Hamrick,et al.  Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  E. Davis,et al.  How Robust Are Probabilistic Models of Higher-Level Cognition? , 2013, Psychological science.

[18]  Kevin A. Smith,et al.  Consistent physics underlying ballistic motion prediction , 2013, CogSci.

[19]  Vikash K. Mansinghka,et al.  Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects. , 2013, Psychological review.

[20]  James L. McClelland Integrating probabilistic models of perception and interactive neural networks: a historical and tutorial review , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[21]  Roland Memisevic,et al.  Modeling Deep Temporal Dependencies with Recurrent "Grammar Cells" , 2014, NIPS.

[22]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[23]  Adam N. Sanborn Testing Bayesian and heuristic predictions of mass judgments of colliding objects , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[24]  Kazushi Maruya,et al.  Seeing liquids from visual motion , 2015, Vision Research.

[25]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior , 2015 .