The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions

The anticipative learning model for acquiring action-effect relations states that the acquisition of action-effect relations depends on processes that are part of action planning, in particular the anticipation of possible effects. Experiment 1 shows that response planning is indeed crucial for the learning of response effects. In this experiment distractors (tones) were presented either during response preparation or in the time interval between response execution and the presentation of a response effect. Response-effect learning was impaired when the distractors were presented during response preparation. The finding is consistent with the assumption that the distractors impaired the anticipation of potential effects and therefore reduced effect learning. In Experiment 2 all responses had two effects. Participants were instructed to produce one of the effects. Under this condition, response-effect learning was only found for the instructed effect, not for the non-instructed effect. The two experiments thus support the view that response-effect learning is selective and depends on the anticipation of potential effects during response planning. The results are discussed in terms of a model that explains both the learning of response-effect relations and the use of these effects for action control within the same theoretical framework.

[1]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[2]  B. Hommel Inverting the Simon effect intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. , 1993 .

[3]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[4]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2000, Brain Research Reviews.

[6]  W. Kunde,et al.  Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  B Hommel,et al.  The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects , 1996, Psychological research.

[8]  D. Shanks Is Human Learning Rational? , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  J. F. Herbart Psychologie als Wissenschaft : neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik , 1824 .

[10]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[11]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[12]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  B. Hommel,et al.  Effect anticipation and action control , 2001 .

[14]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[15]  S. Coren An efferent component in the visual perception of direction and extent. , 1986, Psychological review.

[16]  W. Prinz,et al.  Effect of stimulus degradation on category search. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[17]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[18]  Peter Wolff,et al.  Chapter 3 Space perception and intended action , 1999 .

[19]  T. Bachmann,et al.  Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 129) , 1999 .

[20]  W. Prinz Common mechanisms in perception and action. , 2002 .

[21]  P. Wolff Saccadic exploration and perceptual-motor learning. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[22]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[24]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Why don't we perceive our brain states? , 1992 .

[25]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[26]  M. Ziessler,et al.  Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Action, binding and awareness , 2002 .