Spectral and temporal cues for perception of material and action categories in impacted sound sources.

In two experiments, similarity ratings and categorization performance with recorded impact sounds representing three material categories (wood, metal, glass) being manipulated by three different categories of action (drop, strike, rattle) were examined. Previous research focusing on single impact sounds suggests that temporal cues related to damping are essential for material discrimination, but spectral cues are potentially more efficient for discriminating materials manipulated by different actions that include multiple impacts (e.g., dropping, rattling). Perceived similarity between material categories across different actions was correlated with the distribution of long-term spectral energy (spectral centroid). Similarity between action categories was described by the temporal distribution of envelope energy (temporal centroid) or by the density of impacts. Moreover, perceptual similarity correlated with the pattern of confusion in categorization judgments. Listeners tended to confuse materials with similar spectral centroids, and actions with similar temporal centroids and onset densities. To confirm the influence of these different features, spectral cues were removed by applying the envelopes of the original sounds to a broadband noise carrier. Without spectral cues, listeners retained sensitivity to action categories but not to material categories. Conversely, listeners recognized material but not action categories after envelope scrambling that preserved long-term spectral content.

[1]  T Dau,et al.  A quantitative model of the "effective" signal processing in the auditory system. I. Model structure. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  W H Warren,et al.  Auditory perception of breaking and bouncing events: a case study in ecological acoustics. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[4]  A. de Cheveigné,et al.  The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  W H Warren,et al.  The Way the Ball Bounces: Visual and Auditory Perception of Elasticity and Control of the Bounce Pass , 1987, Perception.

[6]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Altering object representations through category learning , 2001, Cognition.

[7]  Brian Gygi,et al.  Similarity and categorization of environmental sounds , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  G. Soete,et al.  Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes , 1995, Psychological research.

[9]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Article Sound Texture Perception via Statistics of the Auditory Periphery: Evidence from Sound Synthesis , 2022 .

[10]  M C Killion,et al.  Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: where is the "missing 6 dB"? , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M. Turvey,et al.  Hearing shape. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Dinesh K. Pai,et al.  Perception of Material from Contact Sounds , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Guillaume Lemaitre,et al.  Auditory perception of material is fragile while action is strikingly robust. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  R. Patterson,et al.  Complex Sounds and Auditory Images , 1992 .

[15]  Bruno L. Giordano Sound source perception in impact sounds , 2006 .

[16]  S. McAdams,et al.  The psychomechanics of simulated sound sources: material properties of impacted bars. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  William W. Gaver What in the World Do We Hear? An Ecological Approach to Auditory Event Perception , 1993 .

[18]  D. Luce,et al.  Detection and Recognition " ' , 2006 .

[19]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[20]  Richard Kronland-Martinet,et al.  Controlling the Perceived Material in an Impact Sound Synthesizer , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[21]  R. Lutfi,et al.  Auditory discrimination of material changes in a struck-clamped bar. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  The psychomechanics of simulated sound sources: material properties of impacted thin plates. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Sound Source Mechanics and Musical Timbre Perception: Evidence From Previous Studies , 2010 .

[24]  Robert L. Goldstone The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.

[25]  Michael S. Lewicki,et al.  Efficient coding of natural sounds , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Dhany Arifianto,et al.  Estimates of compression at low and high frequencies using masking additivity in normal and impaired ears. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  R A Lutfi,et al.  Auditory detection of hollowness. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[29]  D. Norman,et al.  Everyday listening and auditory icons , 1988 .

[30]  Bruno L. Giordano,et al.  Material identification of real impact sounds: effects of size variation in steel, glass, wood, and plexiglass plates. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Davide Rocchesso,et al.  Physical Modeling of Impacts: Theory and Experiments on Contact Time and Spectral Centroid , 2004 .

[32]  Guy J. Brown,et al.  Modelling the Auditory Perception of Size, Shape and Material: Applications to the Classification of Transient Sonar Sounds , 2003 .

[33]  Brian Gygi,et al.  Spectral-temporal factors in the identification of environmental sounds. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  J. W. Gordon,et al.  Perceptual effects of spectral modifications on musical timbres , 1978 .

[35]  Bruno L. Giordano Material categorization and hardness scaling in real and synthetic impact sounds , 2003 .

[36]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Identification of walked-upon materials in auditory, kinesthetic, haptic, and audio-haptic conditions. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  V. Sloutsky The role of similarity in the development of categorization , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Predicting similarity and categorization from identification. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.

[40]  Davide Rocchesso,et al.  Controlling Material Properties in Physical Models of Sounding Objects , 2001, ICMC.

[41]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[42]  R. Shepard Stimulus and response generalization: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space , 1957 .

[43]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Similarity and Recognition , 1988 .

[44]  C. Krumhansl Concerning the Applicability of Geometric Models to Similarity Data : The Interrelationship Between Similarity and Spatial Density , 2005 .

[45]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.