Energy Saving Performance Comparison of Coordinated Multi-Point Transmission and Wireless Relaying

Currently, two cooperative transmission strategies, Coordinated Multi-Point (CoMP) Transmission and wireless relaying, are expected to be deployed in future cellular systems to improve the performance of cell-edge users. Due to the cooperation diversity, these technologies can potentially lead to more energy saving. Therefore in this paper, we analyze their energy saving performance with an average outage constraint. The impact of the traffic intensity and BS density are also investigated. Based on the typical parameters setting, our calculation results show that traffic intensity can be divided into three classes: ``coverage-limited'' region, ``energy-efficient'' region, and ``capacity-limited'' region. The coverage-limited region prefers offline fixed algorithms, while dynamic online algorithms are more suitable for the energy-efficient region. As BS density goes higher, the energy-efficient region becomes larger. However, the traffic load region where the cooperation schemes bring benefits becomes smaller. To overcome CoMP, relay stations need to consume energy as small as possible. Even through relay cost energy low enough, the traffic intensity region where wireless relaying overcomes CoMP will become smaller as network goes denser. Our analytical results are of great help for future ``green'' network planning.

[1]  S. Wittevrongel,et al.  Queueing Systems , 2019, Introduction to Stochastic Processes and Simulation.

[2]  Holger Karl,et al.  An overview of energy-efficiency techniques for mobile communication systems , 2003 .

[3]  Zhang Chao,et al.  Green Mobile Access Network with Dynamic Base Station Energy Saving , 2009 .

[4]  Marco Ajmone Marsan,et al.  Energy-Aware UMTS Access Networks , 2008 .

[5]  Reinaldo A. Valenzuela,et al.  Network coordination for spectrally efficient communications in cellular systems , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[6]  M. Bublin,et al.  Inter-cell Interference Management by Dynamic Channel Allocation, Scheduling and Smart Antennas , 2007, 2007 16th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit.

[7]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  Enhancing the cellular downlink capacity via co-processing at the transmitting end , 2001, IEEE VTS 53rd Vehicular Technology Conference, Spring 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37202).

[9]  L. Chiaraviglio,et al.  Optimal Energy Savings in Cellular Access Networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops.

[10]  Rudolf Mathar,et al.  On the optimal base-station density for CDMA cellular networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  Ari Hottinen,et al.  Increasing downlink cellular throughput with limited network MIMO coordination , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[12]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Green WLANs: On-Demand WLAN Infrastructures , 2009, Mob. Networks Appl..