Probabilistic decision making for collision avoidance systems: Postponing decisions

For collision avoidance systems to be accepted by human drivers, it is important to keep the rate of unnecessary interventions very low. This is challenging since the decision to intervene or not is based on incomplete and uncertain information. The contribution of this paper is a decision making strategy for collision avoidance systems which allows the system to occasionally postpone a decision in order to collect more information. The problem is formulated in the framework of statistical decision theory, and the core of the algorithm is to run a preposterior analysis to estimate the benefit of deciding with the additional information. A final decision is made by comparing this benefit with the cost of delaying the intervention. The proposed approach is evaluated in simulation at a two-way stop road intersection for stop sign violation scenarios. The results show that the ability to postpone decisions leads to a significant reduction of false alarms and does not impair the ability of the collision avoidance system to prevent accidents.

[1]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[2]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Evaluating risk at road intersections by detecting conflicting intentions , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Y. Liu,et al.  Performance evaluation of intersection warning system using a vehicle traffic and wireless simulator , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005..

[4]  Alan Kirk,et al.  Accident causation and pre-accidental driving situations. Part 2. In-depth accident causation analysis , 2008 .

[5]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  Situation Assessment of an Autonomous Emergency Brake for Arbitrary Vehicle-to-Vehicle Collision Scenarios , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Risk assessment at road intersections: Comparing intention and expectation , 2012, 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[7]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS DESIGN ISSUES FOR CRASH AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[8]  Kristian Kroschel,et al.  A Multilevel Collision Mitigation Approach—Its Situation Assessment, Decision Making, and Performance Tradeoffs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  Thao Dang,et al.  Stochastic situation assessment in advanced driver assistance system for complex multi-objects traffic situations , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  A framework and automotive application of collision avoidance decision making , 2008, Autom..

[11]  Lars Hammarstrand,et al.  A Probabilistic Framework for Decision-Making in Collision Avoidance Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  Mark L. Berenson,et al.  Business Statistics , 2009, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[13]  Jonas Sjöberg,et al.  Model-Based Threat Assessment for Avoiding Arbitrary Vehicle Collisions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  Daniel Business Statistics , 1991 .

[15]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[16]  Katja Vogel,et al.  A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Lars Petersson,et al.  Statistical Threat Assessment for General Road Scenes Using Monte Carlo Sampling , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.