Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.

Prior research has shown contextual manipulations involving temporal and sequence related factors significantly moderate attention-related responses, as indexed by the P3b event-related-potential, towards infrequent (i.e., deviant) target oddball stimuli. However, significantly less research has looked at the influence of cross-modal switching on P3b responding, with the impact of target-to-target cross-modal transitions being virtually unstudied. To address this gap, this study recorded high-density (256 electrodes) EEG data from twenty-five participants as they completed a cross-modal visual-auditory oddball task. This task was comprised of unimodal visual (70% Nontargets: 30% Deviant-targets) and auditory (70% Nontargets: 30% Deviant-targets) oddballs presented in fixed alternating order (i.e., visual-auditory-visual-auditory, etc.) with participants being tasked with detecting deviant-targets in both modalities. Differences in the P3b response towards deviant-targets as a function of preceding deviant-target's presentation modality was analyzed using temporal-spatial PCA decomposition. In line with predictions, the results indicate that the ERP response to auditory deviant-targets preceded by visual deviant-targets exhibits an elevated P3b, relative to the processing of auditory deviant-targets preceded by auditory deviant-targets. However, the processing of visual deviant-targets preceded by auditory deviant-targets exhibited a reduced P3b response, relative to the P3b response towards visual deviant-targets preceded by visual deviant-targets. These findings provide the first demonstration of temporally and perceptually decoupled target-to-target cross-modal transitions moderating P3b responses on the oddball paradigm, generally providing support for the context-updating interpretation of the P3b response.

[1]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[2]  A. Kok On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  E. Schröger,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  Jin Fan,et al.  Testing the behavioral interaction and integration of attentional networks , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[7]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[8]  J. Polich,et al.  Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Relationship of P3b single-trial latencies and response times in one, two, and three-stimulus oddball tasks , 2017, Biological Psychology.

[10]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  Christopher R. Brown,et al.  Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Prediction of Auditory and Visual P300 Brain-Computer Interface Aptitude , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  C. Gonsalvez,et al.  Target-to-target interval versus probability effects on P300 in one- and two-tone tasks. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[15]  S. Berti The role of auditory transient and deviance processing in distraction of task performance: a combined behavioral and event-related brain potential study , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  R. Johnson A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  P300 and slow wave from oddball and single-stimulus visual tasks: inter-stimulus interval effects. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[19]  A. Coenen,et al.  Neural generators of the auditory evoked potential components P3a and P3b. , 2012, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[20]  Joseph Dien,et al.  The ERP PCA Toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  Kiti Müller,et al.  Relationship of P300 single-trial responses with reaction time and preceding stimulus sequence. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[23]  E. Schröger,et al.  A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. , 1996, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[24]  Bruno H. Repp,et al.  Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  P. Andrés,et al.  Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing. , 2015, Experimental psychology.

[26]  Ray Johnson For Distinguished Early Career Contribution to Psychophysiology: Award Address, 1985 , 1986 .

[27]  T W Picton,et al.  Temporal and sequential probability in evoked potential studies. , 1981, Canadian journal of psychology.

[28]  Christopher R. Brown,et al.  Inter-modal attention: ERPs to auditory targets in an inter-modal oddball task. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[29]  E. Schröger,et al.  Bottom-up influences on working memory: behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[30]  J. Cohen,et al.  On the number of trials needed for P300. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[31]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  I. Winkler,et al.  Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction? , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[33]  Amy M. Jimenez,et al.  Impaired target detection in schizophrenia and the ventral attentional network: Findings from a joint event-related potential–functional MRI analysis , 2015, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[34]  Ingmar H. A. Franken,et al.  Internal Consistency of Event-Related Potentials Associated with Cognitive Control: N2/P3 and ERN/Pe , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  Richard J. Harris,et al.  Event-related potentials in cross-modal divided attention in autism , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  F E Bloom,et al.  P300 assessment of early Alzheimer's disease. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  Bettina Sorger,et al.  Novelty and target processing during an auditory novelty oddball: A simultaneous event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[38]  Yuezhi Li,et al.  Localizing P300 generators in high-density event- related potential with fMRI. , 2009, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[39]  E. Donchin Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[40]  Daniel M. Roberts,et al.  Contextual task difficulty modulates stimulus discrimination: electrophysiological evidence for interaction between sensory and executive processes. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[41]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception , 2005 .

[42]  D. Linden The P300: Where in the Brain Is It Produced and What Does It Tell Us? , 2005, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[43]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[44]  K. Kiehl,et al.  An event-related fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks , 2001 .

[45]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Babak A. Ardekani,et al.  A functional MRI study of visual oddball: evidence for frontoparietal dysfunction in subjects at risk for alcoholism , 2004, NeuroImage.

[47]  P Ullsperger,et al.  P3 varies with stimulus categorization rather than probability. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[48]  Rachel Rac-Lubashevsky,et al.  Dissociating working memory updating and automatic updating: The reference-back paradigm. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  E Gordon,et al.  Is the target-to-target interval a critical determinant of P3 amplitude? , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[50]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[51]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[52]  A. Engel,et al.  What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[53]  J. Polich,et al.  Auditory and visual P300 topography from a 3 stimulus paradigm , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  S. Galderisi,et al.  The cortical generators of P3a and P3b: A LORETA study , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[55]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[56]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  The Dissociation between Early and Late Selection in Older Adults , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.