Haptic fMRI: Accurately estimating neural responses in motor, pre-motor, and somatosensory cortex during complex motor tasks

Haptics combined with functional magnetic resonance imaging (Haptic fMRI) can non-invasively study how the human brain coordinates movement during complex manipulation tasks, yet avoiding associated fMRI artifacts remains a challenge. Here, we demonstrate confound-free neural activation measurements using Haptic fMRI for an unconstrained three degree-of-freedom motor task that involves planning, reaching, and visually guided trajectory tracking. Our haptic interface tracked subjects' hand motions, velocities, and accelerations (sample-rate, 350Hz), and provided continuous realtime visual feedback. During fMRI acquisition, we achieved uniform response latencies (reaching, 0.7-1.1s; tracking, 0.4-0.65s); minimized hand jitter (<;8mm); and ensured reliable motion trajectories (tracking, <;7mm root-mean-square error). In addition, our protocol decorrelated head motion from both hand speed (r=-0.03) and acceleration (r=-0.025), which reliably produced low head motion levels (<;0.4mm/s between scan volumes) and a low fMRI temporal noise-to-signal ratio (<;1%) across thirty-five scan runs. Our results address the primary outstanding Haptic fMRI confounds: motion induced low spatial-frequency magnetic field changes, which correlate neural activation across cortex; unreliable motions and response latencies, which reduce statistical power; and task-correlated head motion, which causes spurious fMRI activation. Haptic fMRI can thus reliably elicit and localize heterogeneous neural activation for different tasks in motor (movement), pre-motor (planning), and somatosensory (limb displacement) cortex, demonstrating that it is feasible to use the technique to study how the brain achieves three dimensional motor control.

[1]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  An MR compatible robot technology , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[2]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Haptic fMRI: Combining functional neuroimaging with haptics for studying the brain's motor control representation , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[3]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Reduced effective inertia in Macro-/mini-manipulator systems , 1991 .

[4]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Detecting and adjusting for artifacts in fMRI time series data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Andrea Bergmann,et al.  Statistical Parametric Mapping The Analysis Of Functional Brain Images , 2016 .

[6]  Masayuki Hara,et al.  Design and compatibility of a high-performance actuation system for fMRI-based neuroscience studies , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  S. Kastner,et al.  Complex organization of human primary motor cortex: a high-resolution fMRI study. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Marko Munih,et al.  Phantom haptic device upgrade for use in fMRI , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[9]  Carrie R. H. Innes,et al.  fMRI correlates of behavioural microsleeps during a continuous visuomotor task , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Kiyoyuki Chinzei,et al.  MRI-Compatible Robotics , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[11]  Steen Moeller,et al.  Multiband multislice GE‐EPI at 7 tesla, with 16‐fold acceleration using partial parallel imaging with application to high spatial and temporal whole‐brain fMRI , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Dejan B. Popovic,et al.  Influence of planar manipulandum to the hand trajectory during point to point movement , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[13]  R. Gassert,et al.  Model-based attenuation of movement artifacts in fMRI , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  GLMdenoise: a fast, automated technique for denoising task-based fMRI data , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[15]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  FSL , 2012, NeuroImage.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[17]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  fMRI Compatible Haptic Interfaces to Investigate Human Motor Control , 2006, ISER.

[18]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Interpreting the BOLD signal. , 2004, Annual review of physiology.

[19]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[20]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Deriving haptic design guidelines from human physiological, psychophysical, and neurological foundations , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[21]  Yasmin L. Hashambhoy,et al.  Neural Correlates of Reach Errors , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.