Simultaneously Band and Space Limited Functions in Two Dimensions, and Receptive Fields of Visual Neurons

Functions of a single variable that are simultaneously band- and space-limited are useful for spectral estimation, and have also been proposed as reasonable models for the sensitivity profiles of receptive fields of neurons in primary visual cortex. Here we consider the two-dimensional extension of these ideas. Functions that are simultaneously space- and band-limited in circular regions form a natural set of families, parameterized by the “hardness” of the space- and band- limits. For a Gaussian (“soft”) limit, these functions are the two-dimensional Hermite functions, with a modified Gaussian envelope. For abrupt space and spatial frequency limits, these functions are the two-dimensional analogue of the Slepian (prolate spheroidal) functions (Slepian and Pollack [1961]; Slepian [1964]). Between these limiting cases, these families of functions may be regarded as points along a 1-parameter continuum. These families and their associated operators have certain algebraic properties in common. The Hermite functions play a central role, for two reasons. They are good asymptotic approximations of the functions in the other families. Moreover, they can be decomposed both in polar coordinates and in Cartesian coordinates. This joint decomposition provides a way to construct profiles with circular symmetries from superposition of one-dimensional profiles. This result is approximately universal: it holds exactly in the “soft” (Gaussian) limit and in good approximation across the one-parameter continuum to the “hard” (Slepian) limit. These properties lead us to speculate that such two-dimensional profiles will play an important role in the understanding of visual processing in cortical areas beyond primary visual cortex. Comparison with published experimental results lends support to this conjecture.

[1]  D. Slepian Prolate spheroidal wave functions, Fourier analysis and uncertainty — IV: Extensions to many dimensions; generalized prolate spheroidal functions , 1964 .

[2]  Contributions to the Eigenvalue Problem for Slowly Varying Operators , 1982 .

[3]  W. Merigan,et al.  Basic visual capacities and shape discrimination after lesions of extrastriate area V4 in macaques , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[4]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. , 1984, Science.

[5]  Rob R. de Ruyter van Steveninck,et al.  The metabolic cost of neural information , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[7]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Lawrence Sirovich,et al.  The Wigner Transform and Some Exact Properties of Linear Operators , 1982 .

[9]  D. Slepian,et al.  Prolate spheroidal wave functions, fourier analysis and uncertainty — II , 1961 .

[10]  H. Wilson,et al.  Detection of global structure in Glass patterns: implications for form vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[11]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  Lawrence Sirovich,et al.  On the eigentheory of operators which exhibit a slow variation , 1981 .

[13]  David J. Field,et al.  What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding? , 1994, Neural Computation.

[14]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Curvature is a Basic Feature for Visual Search Tasks , 1992, Perception.

[15]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  A subspace reverse-correlation technique for the study of visual neurons , 1997, Vision Research.

[17]  D G Stork,et al.  Do Gabor functions provide appropriate descriptions of visual cortical receptive fields? , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  A. Walden,et al.  Spectral analysis for physical applications : multitaper and conventional univariate techniques , 1996 .

[19]  T. MacRobert Higher Transcendental Functions , 1955, Nature.

[20]  S A Klein,et al.  Minimizing and maximizing the joint space-spatial frequency uncertainty of Gabor-like functions: comment. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  A. Erdélyi,et al.  Higher Transcendental Functions , 1954 .

[22]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Contrast matching data predicted from contrast increment thresholds , 1984, Vision Research.

[23]  Dennis Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication , 1946 .

[24]  Michael J. Hawken,et al.  Macaque VI neurons can signal ‘illusory’ contours , 1993, Nature.

[25]  P. Halmos Finite-Dimensional Vector Spaces , 1960 .

[26]  S. Haykin,et al.  Multiple window time-frequency distribution and coherence of EEG using Slepian sequences and Hermite functions , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Joseph J. Atick,et al.  Towards a Theory of Early Visual Processing , 1990, Neural Computation.

[28]  The eigenfunction problem in higher dimensions: Asymptotic theory. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Gian-Carlo Rota,et al.  The classical umbral calculus , 1994 .

[30]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. , 1993, Science.

[32]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of macaque V2. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  Discriminable textures with identical buffon needle statistics , 1978, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  N. Vilenkin Special Functions and the Theory of Group Representations , 1968 .

[35]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Non-Fourier Cortical Processes in Texture, Form, and Motion Perception , 1999 .

[36]  D. C. Essen,et al.  Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  J D Victor,et al.  Striate cortex extracts higher-order spatial correlations from visual textures. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  N Rubin,et al.  The Role of Junctions in Surface Completion and Contour Matching , 2001, Perception.

[39]  B W Knight,et al.  The eigenfunction problem in higher dimensions: Exact results. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  J. Daugman Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.