Improving the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Overall Survival by Supplementing Readily Available Clinical Data with Gene Expression Levels of IGFBP3 and F3 in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Core Needle Biopsy Material

Background A previously reported expression signature of three genes (IGFBP3, F3 and VGLL3) was shown to have potential prognostic value in estimating overall and cancer-specific survivals at diagnosis of prostate cancer in a pilot cohort study using freshly frozen Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) samples. Methods We carried out a new cohort study with 241 prostate cancer patients diagnosed from 2004–2007 with a follow-up exceeding 6 years in order to verify the prognostic value of gene expression signature in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) prostate core needle biopsy tissue samples. The cohort consisted of four patient groups with different survival times and death causes. A four multiplex one-step RT-qPCR test kit, designed and optimized for measuring the expression signature in FFPE core needle biopsy samples, was used. In archive FFPE biopsy samples the expression differences of two genes (IGFBP3 and F3) were measured. The survival time predictions using the current clinical parameters only, such as age at diagnosis, Gleason score, PSA value and tumor stage, and clinical parameters supplemented with the expression levels of IGFBP3 and F3, were compared. Results When combined with currently used clinical parameters, the gene expression levels of IGFBP3 and F3 are improving the prediction of survival time as compared to using clinical parameters alone. Conclusion The assessment of IGFBP3 and F3 gene expression levels in FFPE prostate cancer tissue would provide an improved survival prediction for prostate cancer patients at the time of diagnosis.

[1]  P. Stattin,et al.  Undertreatment of Men in Their Seventies with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[2]  Y. Pawitan,et al.  Operator Dependent Choice of Prostate Cancer Biopsy Has Limited Impact on a Gene Signature Analysis for the Highly Expressed Genes IGFBP3 and F3 in Prostate Cancer Epithelial Cells , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  Lawrence D. True,et al.  The critical role of the pathologist in determining eligibility for active surveillance as a management option in patients with prostate cancer: consensus statement with recommendations supported by the College of American Pathologists, International Society of Urological Pathology, Association of D , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[5]  Thomas M. Blomquist,et al.  A Multiplex Two-Color Real-Time PCR Method for Quality-Controlled Molecular Diagnostic Testing of FFPE Samples , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Y. Pawitan,et al.  An expression signature at diagnosis to estimate prostate cancer patients' overall survival , 2014, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease.

[7]  Kaitlyn M. Gayvert,et al.  Predicting Cancer Prognosis Using Functional Genomics Data Sets , 2014, Cancer informatics.

[8]  Hesham Hassan,et al.  On the Significance of Fuzzification of the N and M in Cancer Staging , 2014, Cancer informatics.

[9]  J. Crook,et al.  Prognostic factors for newly diagnosed prostate cancer and their role in treatment selection. , 2013, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[10]  R. Eeles,et al.  The role of genetic markers in the management of prostate cancer. , 2012, European urology.

[11]  Todd H. Stokes,et al.  k-Nearest neighbor models for microarray gene expression analysis and clinical outcome prediction , 2010, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[12]  A. Berner,et al.  Fine needle aspiration biopsy of the prostate gland , 2007, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[13]  Michael W Pfaffl,et al.  RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance. , 2006, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[14]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate , 2004, Modern Pathology.

[15]  T. Godfrey,et al.  Quantitative mRNA expression analysis from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues using 5' nuclease quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. , 2000, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.