Quantitative Linking Hypotheses for Infant Eye Movements

The study of cognitive development hinges, largely, on the analysis of infant looking. But analyses of eye gaze data require the adoption of linking hypotheses: assumptions about the relationship between observed eye movements and underlying cognitive processes. We develop a general framework for constructing, testing, and comparing these hypotheses, and thus for producing new insights into early cognitive development. We first introduce the general framework – applicable to any infant gaze experiment – and then demonstrate its utility by analyzing data from a set of experiments investigating the role of attentional cues in infant learning. The new analysis uncovers significantly more structure in these data, finding evidence of learning that was not found in standard analyses and showing an unexpected relationship between cue use and learning rate. Finally, we discuss general implications for the construction and testing of quantitative linking hypotheses. MATLAB code for sample linking hypotheses can be found on the first author's website.

[1]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them? , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Rick O. Gilmore,et al.  Examining individual differences in infants’ habituation patterns using objective quantitative techniques , 2002 .

[3]  Chris Donkin,et al.  A Power-Law Model of Psychological Memory Strength in Short- and Long-Term Recognition , 2012, Psychological science.

[4]  Clark Glymour,et al.  What Went Wrong? Reflections on Science by Observation and the Bell Curve , 1998, Philosophy of Science.

[5]  C. Lebiere,et al.  An integrated theory of list memory. , 1998 .

[6]  A. Newell You can't play 20 questions with nature and win : projective comments on the papers of this symposium , 1973 .

[7]  William K. Estes,et al.  Of models and men. , 1957 .

[8]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[9]  K. Lashley The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[10]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Bayesian Statistical Inference for Psychological Research , 1963 .

[11]  V. Marchman,et al.  Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. , 2008, Developmental science.

[12]  J. Halberda,et al.  The development of a word-learning strategy , 2003, Cognition.

[13]  Radford M. Neal,et al.  Splitting and merging components of a nonconjugate Dirichlet process mixture model , 2007 .

[14]  Kazuo Hiraki,et al.  Auditory-visual intermodal matching of small numerosities in 6-month-old infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[15]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  An Interacting Systems Model of Infant Habituation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  G. Miller The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[19]  Linda Lundström,et al.  The pupils and optical systems of gecko eyes. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[20]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[21]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Modeling individual differences using Dirichlet processes , 2006 .

[22]  B. Roder,et al.  Infants' Preferences for Familiarity and Novelty During the Course of Visual Processing. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[23]  Sung-Hyuk Cha,et al.  On measuring the distance between histograms , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[24]  M. Casasola,et al.  Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[25]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The learning curve: implications of a quantitative analysis. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  B. Love,et al.  The myth of computational level theory and the vacuity of rational analysis , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  R. L. Fantz Visual Experience in Infants: Decreased Attention to Familiar Patterns Relative to Novel Ones , 1964, Science.

[28]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Words as Invitations to Form Categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-Month-Old Infants , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Barbara A. Younger,et al.  Developmental change in infants' perception of correlations among attributes. , 1986, Child development.

[30]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  Novel labels support 10-month-olds' attention to novel objects. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[31]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  A Model of Knower-Level Behavior in Number Concept Development , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  D. Teller Linking propositions , 1984, Vision Research.

[33]  R. Baillargeon Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month-old infants , 1986, Cognition.

[34]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Perspectives on Modeling in Cognitive Science , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[35]  K. Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  The eyes have it: lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm , 1987, Journal of Child Language.

[36]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics , 2008, Cognition.

[37]  J. Kruschke What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[39]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  David S. Brée,et al.  Linking Propositions , 1986, COLING.

[41]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. , 1963 .

[42]  Estes Wk The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956 .

[43]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  The Infinite Gaussian Mixture Model , 1999, NIPS.

[44]  Susan C. Levine,et al.  Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them? , 2002 .

[45]  Sylvain Sirois,et al.  Infant cognition: going full factorial with pupil dilation. , 2009, Developmental science.

[46]  D. Aldous Exchangeability and related topics , 1985 .

[47]  Chen Yu,et al.  Visual Data Mining: An Exploratory Approach to Analyzing Temporal Patterns of Eye Movements. , 2012, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[48]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[49]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo Adaptive Sparseness Using Jeffreys Prior , 2001, NIPS.

[50]  J. Werker,et al.  Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks , 1997, Nature.

[51]  Chen Yu,et al.  What you learn is what you see: using eye movements to study infant cross-situational word learning. , 2011, Developmental science.

[52]  Jessica F. Hay,et al.  Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. , 2009, Child development.

[53]  R. Aslin What's in a look? , 2007, Developmental science.

[54]  James L. McClelland The Place of Modeling in Cognitive Science , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[55]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: effects of contrast polarity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  Y. Munakata Challenges to the Violation-of-Expectation Paradigm: Throwing the Conceptual Baby Out With the Perceptual Processing Bathwater? , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[57]  D. Ballard,et al.  Eye movements in natural behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy , 2004, Cognition.

[59]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Uses and misuses of habituation and related preference paradigms , 2004 .

[60]  E. W. Ames,et al.  A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. , 1988 .

[61]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Why Take the Cog Out of Infant Cognition? , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[62]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[63]  D. Barr Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .

[64]  Katherine S White,et al.  Toddlers use speech disfluencies to predict speakers' referential intentions. , 2011, Developmental science.

[65]  Daniel J. Acheson,et al.  Increased Alpha-Band Power during the Retention of Shapes and Shape-Location Associations in Visual Short-Term Memory , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[66]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. , 2005, Developmental science.

[67]  E. Thelen,et al.  Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation. , 2006, Psychological review.

[68]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[69]  N. Kirkham,et al.  No two cues are alike: Depth of learning during infancy is dependent on what orients attention. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[70]  Cara H. Cashon,et al.  Eight-Month-Old Infants' Perception of Possible and Impossible Events. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[71]  E. Spelke Nativism, empiricism, and the origins of knowledge , 1998 .

[72]  Britt Anderson,et al.  There is no Such Thing as Attention , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[73]  R. Siegler The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. , 1987 .

[74]  W. Estes The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[75]  Satsuki Nakai,et al.  Distinguishing novelty and familiarity effects in infant preference procedures , 2004 .