Alternate Strategies for a Win-Win Seeking Agent in Agent-Human Negotiations

With the growth of e-commerce and e-markets, there is an increasing potential for the use of software agents to negotiate business tasks with human negotiators. Guided by design science methodology, this research prescribes and validates a win-win seeking negotiation agent using strategies of "simultaneous-equivalent offers" and "delayed acceptance" and compares their effects against the use of conventional sequential-single offer and immediate acceptance strategies. To evaluate the alternate strategies, a negotiation agent system was implemented and an experiment was conducted in which 110 agent-human dyads negotiated over a four-issue online purchase task. Our results indicate that the proposed agent strategies can enhance the economic performance of the negotiated outcome (counterpart agreement ratio, individual utility, joint utility, and the distance to Pareto-efficient frontier) and maintain the human counterparts' positive perceptions toward the outcome and the agent. The findings confirm the efficacy of the proposed design and showcase an innovative system to facilitate e-commerce transactions.

[1]  William C. Perkins,et al.  An empirical study of the efficacy of a computerized negotiation support system (NSS) , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  A. Marty.  Getting to YES. Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In , 1983 .

[3]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation , 1991 .

[4]  A. Galinsky,et al.  First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Are All E-Commerce Negotiations Auctions? , 2000, COOP.

[6]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Misremembrance of Options Past: Source Monitoring and Choice , 2000, Psychological science.

[7]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  The Limits of Mass Customization , 2001 .

[8]  J. Nash.  THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[9]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making , 2003 .

[10]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Choice and Achievement at the Bargaining Table: The Distributive, Integrative, and Interpersonal Advantages of Making Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers , 2005 .

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Support Systems , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Elizabeth Hunt Jones,et al.  Analytical mediation: an empirical examination of the effects of computer support for different levels of conflict in two-party negotiation , 1988 .

[13]  M. Bichler.  The Future of Emarkets: Multi-Dimensional Market Mechanisms , 2001 .

[14]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  What Do People Value When They Negotiate? Mapping the Domain of Subjective Value in Negotiation , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[16]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an , 1997 .

[17]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? , 2010, CACM.

[18]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Computer-supported negotiations: an experimental study of bargaining in electronic commerce , 2000, ICIS.

[19]  H. Raiffa.  The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .

[20]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  Mismatching the opponent's offers in negotiation☆ , 1985 .

[21]  V. Smith.  Experimental Economics : Induced Value Theory , 2007 .

[22]  R. Walton,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. , 1966 .

[23]  J. Blair,et al.  Consider Both Relationships and Substance When Negotiating Strategically , 1989 .

[24]  N. R. Jennings,et al.  To appear in: Int Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation GDN2000 Keynote Paper Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges , 2022 .

[25]  J. Rubin,et al.  Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement, 2nd ed. , 1994 .

[26]  Sheryl B. Ball,et al.  An evaluation of learning in the bilateral winner's curse , 1991 .

[27]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[28]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[29]  William A. Cohen.  The importance of expectations on negotiation results , 2003 .

[30]  Manish Agrawal,et al.  Multi-Issue Automated Negotiations Using Agents , 2007, INFORMS J. Comput..

[31]  L. Thompson.  Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. , 1990 .

[32]  L. Thompson,et al.  The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator , 1997 .

[33]  W. C. Perkins,et al.  An empirical study of an interactive, session-oriented computerized Negotiation Support System (NSS) , 1990 .

[34]  T. M. Tripp,et al.  An evaluation of dependent variables in experimental negotiation studies: Impasse rates and pareto efficiency☆ , 1992 .

[35]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[36]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[37]  Sally Blount White,et al.  Reservation prices, resistance points, and BATNAs: Determining the parameters of acceptable negotiated outcomes , 1991 .

[38]  Raymond Y. K. Lau,et al.  Mining Trading Partners' Preferences for Efficient Multi-Issue Bargaining in E-Business , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  L. Thompson,et al.  TACTICAL BEHAVIOR AND NEGOTIATION OUTCOMES , 1990 .

[40]  William Samuelson,et al.  I Won the Auction But Don't Want the Prize , 1983 .

[41]  Yufei Yuan,et al.  A Web-Based Negotiation Support System , 1998, Electron. Mark..

[42]  BenbasatIzak,et al.  A theoretical perspective of negotiation support systems , 1992 .

[43]  R. Oliver,et al.  Outcome Satisfaction in Negotiation: A Test of Expectancy Disconfirmation , 1994 .

[44]  M. Deutsch.  Trust and suspicion , 1958 .

[45]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Bayesian learning in negotiation , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  R. Hastie,et al.  Social perception in negotiation , 1990 .

[47]  A. Rubinstein.  Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[48]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED NEGOTIATIONS: REVIEW AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES , 2000 .

[49]  Jim R. Oliver.  A Machine-Learning Approach to Automated Negotiation and Prospects for Electronic Commerce , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Lawrence A. Crosby,et al.  Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective: , 1990 .

[51]  Mara Mather,et al.  Memory attributions for choices: How beliefs shape our memories , 2007 .

[52]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .

[53]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  The Dissatisfaction of Having Your First Offer Accepted: The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Negotiations , 2002 .

[54]  M. Bacharach.  Two-person Cooperative Games , 1976 .

[55]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..