Computational protein design with backbone plasticity

The computational algorithms used in the design of artificial proteins have become increasingly sophisticated in recent years, producing a series of remarkable successes. The most dramatic of these is the de novo design of artificial enzymes. The majority of these designs have reused naturally occurring protein structures as ‘scaffolds’ onto which novel functionality can be grafted without having to redesign the backbone structure. The incorporation of backbone flexibility into protein design is a much more computationally challenging problem due to the greatly increased search space, but promises to remove the limitations of reusing natural protein scaffolds. In this review, we outline the principles of computational protein design methods and discuss recent efforts to consider backbone plasticity in the design process.

[1]  W. DeGrado,et al.  Protein design, a minimalist approach. , 1989, Science.

[2]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  Computationally designed libraries of fluorescent proteins evaluated by preservation and diversity of function , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Jasmine L. Gallaher,et al.  Alteration of enzyme specificity by computational loop remodeling and design , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  L. Kay,et al.  Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis , 2005, Nature.

[5]  James Barber,et al.  Synthetic beta-solenoid proteins with the fragment-free computational design of a beta-hairpin extension , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  F M Richards,et al.  Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. II. Grafting of a buried transition metal binding site into Escherichia coli thioredoxin. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  An evolutionary approach to folding small alpha-helical proteins that uses sequence information and an empirical guiding fitness function. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  William R Taylor,et al.  De novo backbone scaffolds for protein design , 2009, Proteins.

[9]  D. Woolfson The design of coiled-coil structures and assemblies. , 2005, Advances in protein chemistry.

[10]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design , 2008, Nature.

[11]  Colin A. Smith,et al.  Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  David Baker,et al.  Rational design of alpha-helical tandem repeat proteins with closed architectures , 2015, Nature.

[13]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[14]  J. Ponder,et al.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  David Baker,et al.  Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity , 2013, Nature.

[16]  S L Mayo,et al.  Coupling backbone flexibility and amino acid sequence selection in protein design , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Recognition Dynamics Up to Microseconds Revealed from an RDC-Derived Ubiquitin Ensemble in Solution , 2008, Science.

[18]  Alessandro Senes,et al.  Toward high-resolution computational design of the structure and function of helical membrane proteins , 2016, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[19]  Philip A. Romero,et al.  Exploring protein fitness landscapes by directed evolution , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[20]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Antibody Multispecificity Mediated by Conformational Diversity , 2003, Science.

[21]  D. Baker,et al.  Principles for designing ideal protein structures , 2012, Nature.

[22]  M. Levitt,et al.  Accurate prediction of the stability and activity effects of site-directed mutagenesis on a protein core , 1991, Nature.

[23]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Coupling Protein Side-Chain and Backbone Flexibility Improves the Re-design of Protein-Ligand Specificity , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  D. Baker,et al.  A large scale test of computational protein design: folding and stability of nine completely redesigned globular proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  Adrian A Canutescu,et al.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  D. Baker,et al.  Relaxation of backbone bond geometry improves protein energy landscape modeling , 2014, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[27]  Bruce Randall Donald,et al.  Dead-End Elimination with Backbone Flexibility , 2007, ISMB/ECCB.

[28]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  Protein design: a perspective from simple tractable models , 1998, Folding & design.

[29]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Christopher C. Moser,et al.  Design and engineering of an O(2) transport protein , 2009, Nature.

[31]  David Baker,et al.  Exploring the repeat protein universe through computational protein design , 2015, Nature.

[32]  Johan Desmet,et al.  The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning , 1992, Nature.

[33]  Z. Popovic,et al.  Increased Diels-Alderase activity through backbone remodeling guided by Foldit players , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  Richard B. Sessions,et al.  Computational design of water-soluble α-helical barrels , 2014, Science.

[35]  K. Dill,et al.  Resultants and Loop Closure , 2006 .

[36]  James W. Murray,et al.  High–quality protein backbone reconstruction from alpha carbons using Gaussian mixture models , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[37]  Peter Minary,et al.  Conformational Optimization with Natural Degrees of Freedom: A Novel Stochastic Chain Closure Algorithm , 2010, J. Comput. Biol..

[38]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. , 2006, Structure.

[39]  P. Bradley,et al.  Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small Proteins , 2005, Science.

[40]  J R Desjarlais,et al.  De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  De Novo Computational Design of Retro-Aldol Enzymes , 2008, Science.

[42]  D. Baker,et al.  High thermodynamic stability of parametrically designed helical bundles , 2014, Science.

[43]  P. S. Kim,et al.  High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. , 1998, Science.

[44]  J R Desjarlais,et al.  Side-chain and backbone flexibility in protein core design. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Protein design automation , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[46]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. , 1997, Science.

[47]  David Baker,et al.  An exciting but challenging road ahead for computational enzyme design , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[48]  W. DeGrado,et al.  De novo design of catalytic proteins. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Jens Meiler,et al.  New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[50]  A. Sali,et al.  Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[51]  Paul S. Freemont,et al.  Validating a Coarse-Grained Potential Energy Function through Protein Loop Modelling , 2013, PloS one.

[52]  Laura S Itzhaki,et al.  Tandem-repeat proteins: regularity plus modularity equals design-ability. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[53]  Elisabeth L. Humphris,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interface sequence diversity using flexible backbone computational protein design. , 2008, Structure.

[54]  F M Richards,et al.  Optimal sequence selection in proteins of known structure by simulated evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  D. Baker,et al.  Control over overall shape and size in de novo designed proteins , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  High-resolution design of a protein loop , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  De Yonker,et al.  A New Approach to Protein Design: Grafting of a Buried Transition Metal Binding Site into Escherichia coli Thioredoxin , 1992 .