Safety Map: A Unified Representation for Biomechanics Impact Data and Robot Instantaneous Dynamic Properties

Close physical human–robot interaction makes it essential to ensure human safety. In particular, the intrinsic safety characteristics of a robot in terms of potential human injury have to be understood well. Then, minimal potential harm can be made a key requirement already at an early stage of the robot design. In this letter, we propose the safety map concept, a map that captures human injury occurrence and robot inherent global or task-dependent safety properties in a unified manner, making it a novel, powerful, and convenient tool to quantitatively analyze the safety performance of a certain robot design. In this letter, we derive the concept and elaborate the map representations of the PUMA 560, KUKA Lightweight Robot IV+, and injury data of the human head and chest. For the latter, we classify and summarize the most relevant impact studies and extend existing literature overviews. Finally, we validate our approach by deriving the safety map for a pick and place task, which allows us to assess human safety and guide the task/robot designer how to take measures in order to account for both safety and task performance requirements, respectively.

[1]  David C. Viano,et al.  Thoracic Impact Response of Live Porcine Subjects , 1976 .

[2]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Object manipulation in a multi-effector robot system , 1988 .

[3]  Philip E. Martin,et al.  Estimating segment inertial properties: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with existing methods. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Inertial Properties in Robotic Manipulation: An Object-Level Framework , 1995, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  Sukhan Lee,et al.  Redundant manipulator self-motion topology under joint limits with an 8-DOF case study , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '93).

[6]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Pre-collision safety strategies for human-robot interaction , 2007, Auton. Robots.

[7]  V. R. Hodgson,et al.  Tolerance of the facial bones to impact , 1967 .

[8]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The “DLR crash report”: Towards a standard crash-testing protocol for robot safety - Part II: Discussions , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Koshiro Ono,et al.  Human Head Tolerance to Sagittal Impact Reliable Estimation Deduced from Experimental Head Injury Using Subhuman Primates and Human Cadaver Skulls , 1980 .

[10]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  New insights concerning intrinsic joint elasticity for safety , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  J. Burdick.  On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators: characterization of the self-motion manifolds , 1989 .

[12]  Charles W. Gadd,et al.  Deflection of the Human Thorax Under Sternal Impact-La Dèformation du Thorax Humain sous Impact Sternal (Milieu du Sternum)-Verformung des Menschlichen Thorax hei Stoessen Gegen das Brustbein , 1970 .

[13]  R Voigt,et al.  BREAKING STRENGTH OF THE HUMAN SKULL VS IMPACT SURFACE CURVATURE , 1973 .

[14]  John M. Cavanaugh,et al.  Facial impact tolerance and response , 1986 .

[15]  E S GURDJIAN,et al.  Studies on skull fracture with particular reference to engineering factors. , 1949, American Journal of Surgery.

[16]  Yoshihiko Nakamura,et al.  Physical human robot interaction in imitation learning , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Joseph Cormier,et al.  The tolerance of the nasal bone to blunt impact. , 2010, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[18]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  Facial impact response: a comparison of the Hybrid III dummy and human cadaver , 1988 .

[19]  Jae-Bok Song,et al.  Safe robot arm with safe joint mechanism using nonlinear spring system for collision safety , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  David C. Viano,et al.  Interrelationship of Velocity and Chest Compression in Blunt Thoracic Impact to Swine , 1981 .

[21]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Intrinsically Safer Robots , 1995 .

[22]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The “DLR Crash Report”: Towards a standard crash-testing protocol for robot safety - Part I: Results , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[23]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Requirements for Safe Robots: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[24]  Matteo Parigi Polverini,et al.  A pre-collision control strategy for human-robot interaction based on dissipated energy in potential inelastic impacts , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[25]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  Forces on the Human Body in Simulated Crashes , 1965 .

[26]  Koji Ikuta,et al.  Safety Evaluation Method of Design and Control for Human-Care Robots , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[27]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Development of an Improved Thoracic Injury Criterion , 1998 .

[28]  Sami Haddadin,et al.  Improving the performance of biomechanically safe velocity control for redundant robots through reflected mass minimization , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[29]  John T. McConville,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF INERTIAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1975 .

[30]  Peter I. Corke.  Robotics, Vision and Control - Fundamental Algorithms In MATLAB® Second, Completely Revised, Extended And Updated Edition, Second Edition , 2017, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[31]  C. Y. Warner,et al.  Force/deflection and fracture characteristics of the temporo-parietal region of the human head , 1991 .

[32]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[33]  L. M. Thomas,et al.  Fracture Behavior of the Skull Frontal Bone Against Cylindrical Surfaces , 1970 .

[34]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Cadaver Knee, Chest and Head Impact Loads , 1967 .

[35]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II , 1971 .

[36]  Franziska Zacharias,et al.  Knowledge Representations for Planning Manipulation Tasks , 2012, Cognitive Systems Monographs.

[37]  D. C. Schneider,et al.  Impact Studies of Facial Bones and Skull , 1972 .

[38]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  On making robots understand safety: Embedding injury knowledge into control , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[39]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Combining energy and power based safety metrics in controller design for domestic robots , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[40]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Robotics, Vision and Control - Fundamental Algorithms in MATLAB® , 2011, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[41]  Rainer Christian Konietschke,et al.  Planning of Workplaces with Multiple Kinematically Redundant Robots , 2007 .

[42]  Andrea Maria Zanchettin,et al.  Safety Assessment and Control of Robotic Manipulators Using Danger Field , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[43]  D. Berckmans,et al.  Biomechanics of frontal skull fracture. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[44]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Designing optimally safe robot surface properties for minimizing the stress characteristics of human-robot collisions , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.