Individual Variability of the System‐Level Organization of the Human Brain

Abstract Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging‐based resting‐state functional connectivity analyses of group average data have characterized large‐scale systems that represent a high level in the organizational hierarchy of the human brain. These systems are likely to vary spatially across individuals, even after anatomical alignment, but the characteristics of this variance are unknown. Here, we characterized large‐scale brain systems across two independent datasets of young adults. In these individuals, we were able to identify brain systems that were similar to those described in the group average, and we observed that individuals had consistent topological arrangement of the system features present in the group average. However, the size of system features varied across individuals in systematic ways, such that expansion of one feature of a given system predicted expansion of other parts of the system. Individual‐specific systems also contained unique topological features not present in group average systems; some of these features were consistent across a minority of individuals. These effects were observed even after controlling for data quality and for the accuracy of anatomical registration. The variability characterized here has important implications for cognitive neuroscience investigations, which often assume the functional equivalence of aligned brain regions across individuals.

[1]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Combining voxel intensity and cluster extent with permutation test framework , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  M. Raichle,et al.  Anatomic Localization and Quantitative Analysis of Gradient Refocused Echo-Planar fMRI Susceptibility Artifacts , 1997, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Fox,et al.  Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[4]  V. R. Dondeti,et al.  Max-min matching problems with multiple assignments , 1996 .

[5]  B. T. Thomas Yeo,et al.  Estimates of segregation and overlap of functional connectivity networks in the human cerebral cortex , 2014, NeuroImage.

[6]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Brain and cognition , 1989 .

[7]  Bryan R. Conroy,et al.  Function-based Intersubject Alignment of Human Cortical Anatomy , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human extrastriate cortex in the region of V5/MT+: a probabilistic, stereotaxic map of area hOc5. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Organization of Functional Connections between the Basal Ganglia and Cerebral Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  Cortical Folding Patterns and Predicting Cytoarchitecture , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  Hesheng Liu,et al.  Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2014, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[14]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[15]  M. Fox,et al.  Intrinsic functional relations between human cerebral cortex and thalamus. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  MSM: A new flexible framework for Multimodal Surface Matching , 2014, NeuroImage.

[17]  Bryan R. Conroy,et al.  A Common, High-Dimensional Model of the Representational Space in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2011, Neuron.

[18]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  O. Sporns Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Towards an Individualized Delineation of Functional Neuroanatomy , 2015, Neuron.

[21]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[23]  Timothy S. Coalson,et al.  Parcellations and hemispheric asymmetries of human cerebral cortex analyzed on surface-based atlases. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  An approach for parcellating human cortical areas using resting-state correlations , 2014, NeuroImage.

[25]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  K. Amunts,et al.  Brodmann's Areas 17 and 18 Brought into Stereotaxic Space—Where and How Variable? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[27]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Behavioral Interpretations of Intrinsic Connectivity Networks , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Large-scale Probabilistic Functional Modes from resting state fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[30]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  K. Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space , 2008, Brain Structure and Function.

[34]  G Tononi,et al.  Measures of degeneracy and redundancy in biological networks. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[36]  B. Biswal,et al.  The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age , 1991 .

[38]  Martin Rosvall,et al.  Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  François Bourgeois,et al.  An extension of the Munkres algorithm for the assignment problem to rectangular matrices , 1971, CACM.

[40]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  D. Yurgelun-Todd,et al.  Reproducibility of Single-Subject Functional Connectivity Measurements , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[42]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Measuring structural–functional correspondence: Spatial variability of specialised brain regions after macro-anatomical alignment , 2012, NeuroImage.

[43]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[44]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Degeneracy and cognitive anatomy , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.