Behavioral Cues of Humanness in Complex Environments: How People Engage With Human and Artificially Intelligent Agents in a Multiplayer Videogame

The development of AI that can socially engage with humans is exciting to imagine, but such advanced algorithms might prove harmful if people are no longer able to detect when they are interacting with non-humans in online environments. Because we cannot fully predict how socially intelligent AI will be applied, it is important to conduct research into how sensitive humans are to behaviors of humans compared to those produced by AI. This paper presents results from a behavioral Turing Test, in which participants interacted with a human, or a simple or “social” AI within a complex videogame environment. Participants (66 total) played an open world, interactive videogame with one of these co-players and were instructed that they could interact non-verbally however they desired for 30 min, after which time they would indicate their beliefs about the agent, including three Likert measures of how much participants trusted and liked the co-player, the extent to which they perceived them as a “real person,” and an interview about the overall perception and what cues participants used to determine humanness. T-tests, Analysis of Variance and Tukey's HSD was used to analyze quantitative data, and Cohen's Kappa and χ2 was used to analyze interview data. Our results suggest that it was difficult for participants to distinguish between humans and the social AI on the basis of behavior. An analysis of in-game behaviors, survey data and qualitative responses suggest that participants associated engagement in social interactions with humanness within the game.

[1]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Nonverbal leakage in robots: Communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  Kyveli Kompatsiari,et al.  It’s in the Eyes: The Engaging Role of Eye Contact in HRI , 2019, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  Samuel D. Bradley,et al.  Death with a story: How story impacts emotional, motivational, and physiological responses to first-person shooter video games , 2004 .

[4]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[5]  Gordon Cheng,et al.  Humans are Well Tuned to Detecting Agents Among Non-agents: Examining the Sensitivity of Human Perception to Behavioral Characteristics of Intentional Systems , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[6]  Kevin Warwick,et al.  Can machines think? A report on Turing test experiments at the Royal Society , 2016, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[7]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[8]  Christian A. Gonzalez,et al.  Seeing Minds in Others – Can Agents with Robotic Appearance Have Human-Like Preferences? , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  Joel Veness,et al.  Monte-Carlo Planning in Large POMDPs , 2010, NIPS.

[10]  H. Francis Song,et al.  The Hanabi Challenge: A New Frontier for AI Research , 2019, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Making Sense by Making Sentient : Effectance Motivation Increases , 2010 .

[12]  Hideyuki Nakanishi,et al.  “That Robot Stared Back at Me!”: Demonstrating Perceptual Ability Is Key to Successful Human–Robot Interactions , 2019, Front. Robot. AI.

[13]  Wojciech M. Czarnecki,et al.  Grandmaster level in StarCraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning , 2019, Nature.

[14]  Kai Vogeley,et al.  A Non-Verbal Turing Test: Differentiating Mind from Machine in Gaze-Based Social Interaction , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  Seiji Yamada,et al.  Behavioral Turing test using two-axis actuators , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[16]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[17]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research , 2006 .

[18]  G. McArthur,et al.  Beliefs about human agency influence the neural processing of gaze during joint attention , 2017, Social neuroscience.

[19]  Aude Billard,et al.  Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[20]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[21]  D. Wegner,et al.  The Sting of Intentional Pain , 2008, Psychological science.

[22]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[23]  Susanne Quadflieg,et al.  In our own image? Emotional and neural processing differences when observing human–human vs human–robot interactions , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[24]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[25]  Byron Reeves,et al.  Being in the Game: Effects of Avatar Choice and Point of View on Psychophysiological Responses During Play , 2009 .

[26]  David S. Melnick,et al.  International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening , 2020, Nature.

[27]  Travis L. Wagner,et al.  “The Word Real Is No Longer Real”: Deepfakes, Gender, and the Challenges of AI-Altered Video , 2019, Open Information Science.

[28]  Ran Zhao,et al.  Cognitive-Inspired Conversational-Strategy Reasoner for Socially-Aware Agents , 2017, IJCAI.

[29]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  People help robots who help others, not robots who help themselves , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[30]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  To Err is Human(-like): Effects of Robot Gesture on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Likability , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[31]  Shane Legg,et al.  Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning , 2015, Nature.

[32]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Toward an Integration of Deep Learning and Neuroscience , 2016, bioRxiv.

[33]  Mark O. Riedl,et al.  Rationalization: A Neural Machine Translation Approach to Generating Natural Language Explanations , 2017, AIES.

[34]  S. Tipper,et al.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[36]  G. Metta,et al.  Robots As Intentional Agents: Using Neuroscientific Methods to Make Robots Appear More Social , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[37]  Demis Hassabis,et al.  Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge , 2017, Nature.

[38]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[39]  S. Brison The Intentional Stance , 1989 .

[40]  D. Wegner,et al.  Causes and consequences of mind perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[42]  Anca D. Dragan,et al.  Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learning , 2016, NIPS.

[43]  Eva Wiese,et al.  Better know who you are starving with: Judging humanness in a multiplayer videogame , 2018, APAScience.

[44]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[45]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[46]  Agnieszka Wykowska,et al.  Intentional Mindset Toward Robots—Open Questions and Methodological Challenges , 2019, Front. Robot. AI.

[47]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  How to build robots that make friends and influence people , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[48]  Minoru Asada,et al.  Different impressions of other agents obtained through social interaction uniquely modulate dorsal and ventral pathway activities in the social human brain , 2014, Cortex.

[49]  D. Wegner,et al.  Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.

[50]  Jiebo Luo,et al.  AI for Earth: Rainforest Conservation by Acoustic Surveillance , 2019, ArXiv.

[51]  John E. Laird,et al.  Human-Level AI's Killer Application: Interactive Computer Games , 2000, AI Mag..

[52]  G. Sandini,et al.  Motor Contagion during Human-Human and Human-Robot Interaction , 2014, PloS one.

[53]  E. Wiese,et al.  Beliefs about the Minds of Others Influence How We Process Sensory Information , 2014, PloS one.

[54]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.