Learning to Be (In)variant: Combining Prior Knowledge and Experience to Infer Orientation Invariance in Object Recognition.

How does the visual system recognize images of a novel object after a single observation despite possible variations in the viewpoint of that object relative to the observer? One possibility is comparing the image with a prototype for invariance over a relevant transformation set (e.g., translations and dilations). However, invariance over rotations (i.e., orientation invariance) has proven difficult to analyze, because it applies to some objects but not others. We propose that the invariant transformations of an object are learned by incorporating prior expectations with real-world evidence. We test this proposal by developing an ideal learner model for learning invariance that predicts better learning of orientation dependence when prior expectations about orientation are weak. This prediction was supported in two behavioral experiments, where participants learned the orientation dependence of novel images using feedback from solving arithmetic problems.

[1]  Joseph L. Austerweil,et al.  Structure and Flexibility in Bayesian Models of Cognition , 2015 .

[2]  Joseph L. Austerweil,et al.  A nonparametric Bayesian framework for constructing flexible feature representations. , 2013, Psychological review.

[3]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  An ideal observer model for identifying the reference frame of objects , 2011, NIPS.

[4]  Charles Kemp,et al.  How to Grow a Mind: Statistics, Structure, and Abstraction , 2011, Science.

[5]  C. Baker,et al.  The neural basis of visual object learning , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  D. Blei,et al.  Context, learning, and extinction. , 2010, Psychological review.

[7]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  The representation of object viewpoint in human visual cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[8]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Learning to See and Conceive , 2008 .

[9]  J. Pitman Combinatorial Stochastic Processes , 2006 .

[10]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[11]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Models of object recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  A B Sekuler,et al.  Interactions between symmetry and elongation in determining reference frames for object perception. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[13]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The development of features in object concepts , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  J. Pitman Random discrete distributions invariant under size-biased permutation , 1996, Advances in Applied Probability.

[17]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[18]  P T Quinlan Evidence for the use of scene-based frames of reference in two-dimensional shape recognition. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[19]  G. Kane Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[20]  C D Gilbert,et al.  Early perceptual learning. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual Frames of Reference and Two-Dimensional Shape Recognition: Further Examination of Internal Axes , 1993, Perception.

[22]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Automatization and training in visual search. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[23]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization , 1991 .

[25]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Reference frames in the perception of shape and orientation , 1989 .

[27]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[28]  P. Jolicoeur The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[29]  D. Aldous Exchangeability and related topics , 1985 .

[30]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[31]  G. Humphreys Reference frames and shape perception , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  S. Palmer The Psychology of Perceptual Organization: A Transformational Approach , 1983 .

[33]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[34]  S. Palmer What makes triangles point: Local and global effects in configurations of ambiguous triangles , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[36]  Ernst Mach,et al.  The Analysis of Sensations. , 1916 .