Parallel Formation of Differently Sized Groups in a Robotic Swarm (特集 スワーム : 群れの創発的挙動生成)

tasks. Imagine a swarm of robots that must be deployed to monitor the spread of an environmental hazard. Different hazard areas of various sizes will need correspondingly sized groups of robots, and the hazard sites may be spread far apart. As in any such real-world scenario, it is likely that there will not be enough robots to allocate the ideal number to each hazard site. In this paper, we propose a distributed mechanism to solve this type of group formation problem, whereby large numbers of robots must be divided into multiple groups in parallel. When the number of available robots is sufficient, our system is capable of forming groups of different, pre-defined sizes. When the available robots are less than the sum of the desired sizes, our system distributes robots fairly across groups, ensuring that each group grows at the same rate. Existing approaches to parallel group formation in multi-robot systems have limitations that render them inappropriate for this type of scenario. Decentralised task allocation and task partitioning approaches scale well, but they only work when the tasks are located close to each other and the density of robots is sufficiently high 7)

[1]  Eliseo Ferrante,et al.  ARGoS: a modular, parallel, multi-engine simulator for multi-robot systems , 2012, Swarm Intelligence.

[2]  Mauro Birattari,et al.  A reliable distributed algorithm for group size estimation with minimal communication requirements , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Robotics.

[3]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Mobile Sensor Network Deployment using Potential Fields : A Distributed , Scalable Solution to the Area Coverage Problem , 2002 .

[4]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Quadrotor Using Minimal Sensing For Autonomous Indoor Flight , 2007 .

[6]  Mauro Birattari,et al.  Task partitioning in swarms of robots: an adaptive method for strategy selection , 2011, Swarm Intelligence.

[7]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Swarm-Bots to the Rescue , 2009, ECAL.

[8]  Eliseo Ferrante,et al.  Swarmanoid: A Novel Concept for the Study of Heterogeneous Robotic Swarms , 2013, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[9]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Market-Based Multirobot Coordination: A Survey and Analysis , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Supervised Group Size Regulation in a Heterogeneous Robotic Swarm , 2009 .

[11]  M. Rust,et al.  Understanding and controlling the German cockroach , 1995 .

[12]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Aggregation Behaviour as a Source of Collective Decision in a Group of Cockroach-Like-Robots , 2005, ECAL.

[13]  José Halloy,et al.  Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Dario Floreano,et al.  2.5D infrared range and bearing system for collective robotics , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  William M. Spears,et al.  Distributed, Physics-Based Control of Swarms of Vehicles , 2004 .

[16]  Spring Berman,et al.  Biologically inspired redistribution of a swarm of robots among multiple sites , 2008, Swarm Intelligence.

[17]  Chris Melhuish,et al.  Convoying: using chorusing to form travelling groups of minimal agents , 1999, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[18]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  The marXbot, a miniature mobile robot opening new perspectives for the collective-robotic research , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.