Do Robot Performance and Behavioral Style a ↵ ect Human Trust ? A Multi-Method Approach

An important aspect of a robot’s social behavior is to convey the right amount of trustworthiness. Task performance has shown to be an important source for trustworthiness judgments. Here, we argue that factors such as a robot’s behavioral style can play an important role as well. Our approach to studying the effects of a robot’s performance and behavioral style on human trust involves experiments with simulated robots in video human–robot interaction (VHRI) and immersive virtual environments (IVE). Although VHRI and IVE settings cannot substitute for the genuine interaction with a real robot, they can provide useful complementary approaches to experimental research in social human robot interaction. VHRI enables rapid prototyping of robot behaviors. Simulating human–robot interaction in IVEs can be a useful tool for measuring human responses to robots and help avoid the many constraints caused by real-world hardware. However, there are also difficulties with the generalization of results from one setting (e.g., VHRI) to another (e.g. IVE or the real world), which we discuss. In this paper, we use animated robot avatars in VHRI to rapidly identify robot behavioral styles that affect human trust assessment of the robot. In a subsequent study, we use an IVE to measure behavioral interaction between humans and an animated robot avatar equipped with behaviors from the VHRI experiment. Our findings reconfirm that a robot’s task performance influences its trustworthiness, but the effect of the behavioral style identified in the VHRI study did not influence the robot’s trustworthiness in the IVE study.

[1]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  A survey of social gaze , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[4]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Integration of Speech and Action in Humanoid Robots: iCub Simulation Experiments , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[5]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  Seeing is believing: Trustworthiness as a dynamic belief , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[7]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Relating conversational expressiveness to social presence and acceptance of an assistive social robot , 2010, Virtual Reality.

[8]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future , 2007 .

[9]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Video prototyping of dog-inspired non-verbal affective communication for an appearance constrained robot , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[10]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[11]  R. Dotsch,et al.  Attentional and behavioural responses of spider fearfuls to virtual spiders , 2010 .

[12]  A. Todorov Evaluating Faces on Trustworthiness , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  A. Todorov,et al.  The functional basis of face evaluation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[15]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Comparing human robot interaction scenarios using live and video based methods: towards a novel methodological approach , 2006, 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006..

[16]  J. Simpson Psychological Foundations of Trust , 2007 .

[17]  L. D. Schmidt,et al.  Perceived interviewer trustworthiness among black and white convicts. , 1972 .

[18]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from Social Psychology , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[20]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Video prototyping in human-robot interaction: results from a qualitative study , 2008, ECCE '08.

[21]  L. D. Schmidt,et al.  Dimensions of interviewer trustworthiness. , 1971 .

[22]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  Reverse Correlating Social Face Perception , 2012 .

[23]  Marc Hanheide,et al.  Evaluating the Robot Personality and Verbal Behavior of Domestic Robots Using Video-Based Studies , 2011, Adv. Robotics.

[24]  N. Emery,et al.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004 .

[26]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[27]  M. Walters The Design Space for Robot Appearance and Behaviour for Social Robot Companions , 2008 .

[28]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Expressing thought: Improving robot readability with animation principles , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[29]  A. Sanfey,et al.  Friend or foe: The effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making , 2008, Cognition.

[30]  M. Delgado,et al.  Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Janine Willis,et al.  First Impressions , 2006, Psychological science.

[32]  T. K. Srull,et al.  A Dual process model of impression formation , 1988 .

[33]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  An empirical framework for human-robot proxemics , 2009 .

[34]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[35]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot Interaction: A Growing Research Field , 2007 .

[36]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  What Immersive Virtual Environment Technology Can Offer to Social Cognition , 2002 .

[37]  R. Dotsch,et al.  Social anxiety predicts avoidance behaviour in virtual encounters , 2010 .

[38]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Design of human symbiotic robot TWENDY-ONE , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[39]  Scott S. Wiltermuth,et al.  Synchrony and Cooperation , 2009, Psychological science.

[40]  Rosemarie E. Yagoda,et al.  You Want Me to Trust a ROBOT? The Development of a Human–Robot Interaction Trust Scale , 2012, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[41]  Alan G. Sanfey,et al.  Social Decision-Making: Insights from Game Theory and Neuroscience , 2007, Science.

[42]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[43]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Detecting the Trustworthiness of Novel Partners in Economic Exchange , 2012, Psychological science.

[44]  G. Jamieson,et al.  CONSIDERING SUBJECTIVE TRUST AND MONITORING BEHAVIOR IN ASSESSING AUTOMATION-INDUCED “COMPLACENCY” , 2004 .