Scalar timing varies with response magnitude in classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

The present experiment was aimed at characterizing the timing of conditioned nictitating membrane (NM) movements as function of the interstimulus interval (ISI) in delay conditioning for rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Onset latency and peak latency were approximately, but not strictly, scalar for all but the smallest movements (<.10 mm). That is, both the mean and standard deviation of the timing measures increased in proportion to the ISI, but their coefficients of variation (standard deviation/mean) tended to be larger for shorter ISIs. For all ISIs, the absolute timing of the NM movements covaried with magnitude. The smaller movements (approximately, .11-.50 mm) were highly variable, and their peaks tended to occur well after the time of US delivery. The larger movements (>.50 mm) were less variable, and their peaks were better aligned with the time of US delivery. These results are discussed with respect to their implications for current models of timing in eyeblink conditioning.

[1]  N. Schneiderman.  Interstimulus interval function of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit under delay versus trace conditioning. , 1966 .

[2]  J. B. Sidowski,et al.  Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology , 1966 .

[3]  M. C. Smith,et al.  CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  Joseph B. Sidowski,et al.  Behavior research methods and instrumentation , 1968 .

[5]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  Jacob Cohen.  Measurement Educational and Psychological Educational and Psychological Measurement Eta-squared and Partial Eta-squared in Fixed Factor Anova Designs Educational and Psychological Measurement Additional Services and Information For , 2022 .

[7]  J. R. Millenson,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response under fixed and mixed CS-US intervals , 1977 .

[8]  J. Gibbon.  Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[9]  Bernard G. Schreurs,et al.  Ruler vs. the Apple II/FIRST system analysis of analog signals in classical conditioning , 1982 .

[10]  Masao Ito.  The Cerebellum And Neural Control , 1984 .

[11]  M K Kaiser,et al.  MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  C. M. Gibbs,et al.  Transduction of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response , 1988 .

[13]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of adaptive timing and temporal discrimination during associative learning , 1989, Neural Networks.

[14]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[15]  J. Ayres,et al.  Extending conditioned stimuli before vs after unconditioned stimuli: Convergence of effect over trials , 1990 .

[16]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Time-Derivative Models of Pavlovian Reinforcement , 1990 .

[17]  R. Bevins,et al.  Extending continuous versus discontinuous conditioned stimuli before versus after unconditioned stimuli. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  E. James Kehoe,et al.  Learning to Learn: Real-Time Features and a Connectionist Model , 1995, Adapt. Behav..

[19]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Conditioned response timing and integration in the cerebellum. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[20]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Society for Neuroscience Abstracts , 1997 .

[21]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  Divergence of conditioned eyeblink and conditioned fear in backward Pavlovian training , 1997 .

[22]  JOHN W. Moore,et al.  Coefficients of variation in timing of the classically conditioned eyeblink in rabbits , 2000, Psychobiology.

[23]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar function: Coordination, learning or timing? , 2000, Current Biology.

[24]  E. Kehoe.  Extension of the CS past the US can facilitate conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[25]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Time, rate, and conditioning. , 2000, Psychological review.

[26]  JOHN W. Moore.  A Neuroscientist's Guide to Classical Conditioning , 2002 .

[27]  E. Kehoe,et al.  Fundamental Behavioral Methods and Findings in Classical Conditioning , 2002 .

[28]  E. Kehoe,et al.  Covariation of alternative measures of responding in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) eyeblink conditioning during acquisition training and tone generalization. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Adaptive timing in neural networks: The conditioned response , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[30]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The learning curve: implications of a quantitative analysis. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  David J. Willshaw,et al.  A Biophysical Model of Synaptic Delay Learning and Temporal Pattern Recognition in a Cerebellar Purkinje Cell , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[32]  E. Kehoe,et al.  Temporally specific extinction of conditioned responses in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane preparation. , 2005, Behavioral neuroscience.

[33]  J. Wearden,et al.  Scalar Properties in Human Timing: Conformity and Violations , 2006 .

[34]  J. Wearden,et al.  Scalar properties in animal timing: conformity and violations. , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  G. Hesslow,et al.  Acquisition, Extinction, and Reacquisition of a Cerebellar Cortical Memory Trace , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Elliot A. Ludvig,et al.  Magnitude and timing of nictitating membrane movements during classical conditioning of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). , 2008, Behavioral neuroscience.

[37]  Nestor A. Schmajuk,et al.  Classical conditioning , 2008, Scholarpedia.