Passive Transparency Compensation for Bilateral Teleoperators with Communication Delays

One of the main challenges in the realization of time-delayed bilateral teleoperators is the stable adaptation of transparency when the remote environmental dynamics are time-varying. In this paper, we propose a bilateral control strategy that passively adjusts the transparency of the system when the slave robot transitions between two different environments. The proposed controller exploits the effect that the wave impedance (a design parameter of the passivity-based scattering transformation) has on transparency without comprising closed-loop stability, regardless of time-varying communication delays. To properly adjust transparency, the control scheme smoothly switches the wave impedance parameter between a low value, ideal for free motion, and a sufficiently large value, suited for hard-contact tasks. We show that, by adopting this strategy, the transmitted impedance to the operator approximates more closely the environmental impedance value. Furthermore, we theoretically prove master-slave position coordination and force tracking under different scenarios. Simulation results illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy.

[1]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey , 2006, Autom..

[2]  R. W. Daniel,et al.  Fundamental Limits of Performance for Force Reflecting Teleoperation , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[4]  M.W. Spong,et al.  Adaptive coordination control of bilateral teleoperators with time delay , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[5]  Sandra Hirche,et al.  Human Perceived Transparency with Time Delay , 2007, Advances in Telerobotics.

[6]  Dongjun Lee,et al.  Passive Bilateral Teleoperation With Constant Time Delay , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[7]  Dongjun Lee,et al.  Passive-Set-Position-Modulation Framework for Interactive Robotic Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[8]  Claudio Melchiorri,et al.  Comparison and Improvement of Control Schemes for Robotic Teleoperation Systems with Time Delay , 2004, Advances in Control of Articulated and Mobile Robots.

[9]  Claudio Melchiorri,et al.  Control schemes for teleoperation with time delay: A comparative study , 2002, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  A time-varying wave impedance approach for transparency compensation in bilateral teleoperation , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Stable Adaptive Teleoperation , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[12]  Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  High performance teleoperation using switching robust control , 2013, 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC).

[13]  Sandra Hirche,et al.  Human-Oriented Control for Haptic Teleoperation , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Günter Niemeyer,et al.  Online tuning of wave impedance in telerobotics , 2004, IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, 2004..

[15]  Hyung-Soon Park,et al.  Two-Channel Transparency-Optimized Control Architectures in Bilateral Teleoperation With Time Delay , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[16]  Rajiv V. Dubey,et al.  Variable damping impedance control of a bilateral telerobotic system , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay , 1989 .

[18]  Erick J. Rodríguez-Seda Transparency compensation for bilateral teleoperators with time-varying communication delays , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Bilateral control of master-slave manipulators for ideal kinesthetic coupling-formulation and experiment , 1994, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[20]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Analysis of Control Architectures for Teleoperation Systems with Impedance/Admittance Master and Slave Manipulators , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[21]  M. Spong,et al.  Robot Modeling and Control , 2005 .

[22]  Dominiek Reynaerts,et al.  Bilateral Teleoperation: Quantifying the Requirements for and Restrictions of Ideal Transparency , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[23]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Comments on "Adaptive manipulator control: a case study" by J. Slotine and W. Li , 1990 .

[24]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Deriving haptic design guidelines from human physiological, psychophysical, and neurological foundations , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[25]  J. Hale,et al.  A STABILITY THEOREM FOR FUNCTIONAL-DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS. , 1963, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Bilateral Telemanipulation With Time Delays: A Two-Layer Approach Combining Passivity and Transparency , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[27]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Position Drift Compensation in Port-Hamiltonian Based Telemanipulation , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[28]  Dongjun Lee,et al.  Experimental Comparison Study of Control Architectures for Bilateral Teleoperators , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[29]  Wataru Fukui,et al.  Two-Fingered Haptic Device for Robot Hand Teleoperation , 2011, J. Robotics.