Intentions and intention recognition in intelligent agents

PerMIS 2009 included a special session that explored R&D work using the Theory of Mind (ToM) concept. Simply stated the ToM hypothesis is that intelligent agents attribute mental states to other agents in order to reason in a theory-like fashion about the causal relation between these unobservable mental states and the agents' subsequent behavior [53]. Such theories grow in part out of the consideration of the richness and complexity of primate social interactions, which have long been seen as a driver for the evolution of primate intelligence [34, 33]. Child research also suggests that as human infants develop they use knowledge of their own mental function as a model for how other agents function. When infants see others acting 'like me,' they construct and test a representational correspondence hypothesis that others have the same mental experience generating their behavior [44]. This is enhanced by the regularities of perceptions and actions of social interaction, where others act as if they are governed by a similar type of mind. Having a ToM is readily useful because it affords the possibility of profitably applying judgments, originally made about one's self, to others. The PerMIS session explored whether the ToM hypothesis can be testing and if the concept is useful to the goal of highly competent systems able to achieve goals in a relatively autonomous way [6].

[1]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  A. Jolly The Evolution of Primate Behavior , 1972 .

[3]  D. Premack,et al.  The perception of intention. , 1989, Science.

[4]  A. Woodward Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach , 1998, Cognition.

[5]  Gergely Csibra,et al.  Recognizing Communicative Intentions in Infancy , 2010 .

[6]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Co-operation and communication in apes and humans , 2003 .

[7]  Rachel Morgan,et al.  Who is Doing What to Whom? Young Infants' Developing Sense of Social Causality in Animated Displays , 2004, Perception.

[8]  Riccardo Manzotti,et al.  From behaviour-based robots to motivation-based robots , 2005, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  David R. Olson,et al.  Developing theories of intention : social understanding and self-control , 1999 .

[10]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Enculturated chimpanzees imitate rationally. , 2007, Developmental science.

[11]  Gary Berg-Cross Is an agent theory of mind (ToM) valuable for adaptive, intelligent systems? , 2009, PerMIS.

[12]  P. Todd,et al.  Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study , 2005 .

[13]  Paul Bello,et al.  Some Computational Desiderata for Recognizing and Reasoning About the Intentions of Others , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Intentions in Intelligent Systems.

[14]  J. Call Inferences about the location of food in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[15]  D. Stern The interpersonal world of infant , 1985 .

[16]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[17]  M. D. Rutherford,et al.  The Perception of Animacy in Young Children with Autism , 2006, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[18]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Controlling a Robot with Intention Derived from Motion , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[19]  T Matsuzawa,et al.  Imitation of intentional manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[20]  Joanna M. Dally,et al.  Social cognition by food-caching corvids. The western scrub-jay as a natural psychologist , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  G. Sandini,et al.  Babybot : an artificial developing robotic agent , 2000 .

[23]  Rick Grush,et al.  The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  A. Klin Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: The Social Attribution Task. , 2000, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[25]  Lisa Meeden Towards planning: incremental investigations into adaptive robot control , 1995 .

[26]  Darren Newtson,et al.  The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior , 1976 .

[27]  B. Scholl Can infants' object concepts be trained? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Intention-based Robot Control in Social Games , 2009 .

[29]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Who is IT? Inferring role and intent from agent motion , 2007, 2007 IEEE 6th International Conference on Development and Learning.

[31]  A. Michotte,et al.  La perception de la causalite , 1956 .

[32]  Z. Nadasdy,et al.  Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age , 1995, Cognition.

[33]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Inferring narrative and intention from playground games , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning.

[34]  J. Searle Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind , 1983 .

[35]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition , 2001 .

[36]  B. Scholl,et al.  Perceiving Causality after the Fact: Postdiction in the Temporal Dynamics of Causal Perception , 2006, Perception.

[37]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Developmental psychology: Rational imitation in preverbal infants , 2002, Nature.

[38]  Ralph Adolphs,et al.  Impaired spontaneous anthropomorphizing despite intact perception and social knowledge. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Robert Kozma,et al.  Implementing intentional robotics principles using SSR2K platform , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[40]  A. Jersild,et al.  Feelings and Emotions. , 1929 .

[41]  G. Csibra,et al.  Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy , 1999, Cognition.

[42]  A. Premack,et al.  Causal cognition : a multidisciplinary debate , 1996 .

[43]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Exploring the mental space of autonomous intentional agents , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[44]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Cooperative activities in young children and chimpanzees. , 2006, Child development.

[45]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  Andre Godin,et al.  Feelings and Emotions: The Mooseheart Symposium , 1953 .

[48]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Sources of Information in Human Action , 2008 .

[49]  Shawn C. Milleville,et al.  Understanding Animate Agents , 2007, Psychological science.

[50]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[51]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Distinguishing Between Animates And Inanimates: Not By Motion Alone , 1995 .

[52]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[53]  Werner Bohleber,et al.  The Interpersonal World of the Infant , 1989 .

[54]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  G. Hesslow Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[57]  Thomas P. Naidich,et al.  Urbach-Wiethe Disease(Lipoid Proteinosis) , 1998, Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[58]  A. Meltzoff 1 Imitation and Other Minds: The "Like Me" Hypothesis , 2005 .

[59]  Wesley Kerr,et al.  Recognizing behaviors and the internal state of the participants , 2010, 2010 IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning.

[60]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[62]  Deepak Kumar,et al.  BRINGING UP ROBOT: FUNDAMENTAL MECHANISMS FOR CREATING A SELF-MOTIVATED, SELF-ORGANIZING ARCHITECTURE , 2005, Cybern. Syst..

[63]  C. Boesch What makes us human (Homo sapiens)? The challenge of cognitive cross-species comparison. , 2007, Journal of comparative psychology.

[64]  Hans Liljenström,et al.  Consciousness Transitions: Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic and Physiological Aspects , 2008 .

[65]  S Hurley,et al.  Perspectives on Imitation , 2004 .

[66]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. , 1977 .

[67]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  Forming and updating object representations without awareness: evidence from motion-induced blindness , 2005, Vision Research.