Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people's loneliness in human-robot interaction

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of physical embodiment in human-agent interaction. Experiment 1 (N=32) shows positive effects of physical embodiment on the feeling of an agent's social presence, the evaluation of the agent, the assessment of public evaluation of the agent, and the evaluation of the interaction with the agent. A path analysis reveals that the feeling of the agent's social presence mediates the participants' evaluation of the social agent. Experiment 2 (N=32) shows that physical embodiment with restricted tactile interaction causes null or even negative effects in human-agent interaction. In addition, Experiment 2 indicates that lonely people feel higher social presence of social agents, and provide more positive social responses to social agents than non-lonely people. The importance of physical embodiment and tactile communication in human-agent interaction and the diverse role of social robots, especially for the lonely population, are discussed.

[1]  Marvin L. Samuelson,et al.  The Companion Animal Bonding Scale: Internal Reliability and Construct Validity , 1987 .

[2]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  I Could Be You: the Phenomenological Dimension of Social Understanding , 1997, Cybern. Syst..

[4]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[5]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[6]  Mel Slater,et al.  Meeting people vitually: experiments in shared virtual environments , 2002 .

[7]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Disentangling Notions of Embodiment , 2001 .

[8]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[9]  J. Walther,et al.  Interpretations, Evaluations, and Consequences of Interpersonal Touch , 1992 .

[10]  Kwan Min Lee,et al.  Why Presence Occurs: Evolutionary Psychology, Media Equation, and Presence , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[12]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[13]  M. Lombard,et al.  Presence and Television: The Role of Screen Size. , 2000 .

[14]  Jean E. Veevers,et al.  The social meanings of pets: Alternative roles for companion animals. , 1985 .

[15]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions , 1998, CHI.

[16]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Touch in Virtual Environments: Haptics and the Design of Interactive Systems , 2001 .

[17]  C. Nass,et al.  The Multiple Source Effect and Synthesized Speech: Doubly-Disembodied Language as a Conceptual Framework , 2004 .

[18]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  The social life of avatars: presence and interaction in shared virtual environments , 2002 .

[21]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[22]  Richard M. Perloff,et al.  THIRD-PERSON EFFECT RESEARCH 1983–1992: A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS , 1993 .

[23]  D. Russell.  UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. , 1996, Journal of personality assessment.

[24]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Stan Franklin,et al.  Autonomous Agents as Embodied Ai , 1997, Cybern. Syst..

[26]  K. Rook,et al.  Social support versus companionship: effects on life stress, loneliness, and evaluations by others. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us , 2002 .

[28]  Hayeon Song,et al.  Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Effects of a robot's long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people's social responses toward it , 2005 .

[29]  R. Heslin,et al.  The meanings of touch: sex differences. , 1975, The Journal of communication.

[30]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  eMuu : an embodied emotional character for the ambient intelligent home , 2002 .