Effects of Absolute Proximity Between Landmark and Platform in a Virtual Morris Pool Task with Humans

In two experiments in a virtual pool the participants were trained to find a hidden platform placed in a specific position in relation to one (Experiment 1) or two (Experiment 2) objects; then, all the participants received a test trial, without the platform, and the time spent in the segment where the platform should have been was measured. In Experiment 1, groups differed in the distance between the landmark and the hidden platform. Test results showed that the control acquired by the landmark was different depending on its relative distance from the platform: Closer landmarks acquired a better control than distant ones. In Experiment 2, two objects, B and F, were simultaneously present during acquisition. Object B was just above the hidden platform (i.e., a beacon for the platform) while object F was above the edge of the pool (i.e., a frame of reference). On the test, the spatial location of B in relation to F was manipulated in the different groups and a generalization gradient was found: Participants spent more time in the segment where B was when B was in front of F (training position), and this time decreased symmetrically with distance of B from F. The two experiments provide convergent evidence of spatial learning effects in a virtual task with humans.

[1]  M L Spetch,et al.  Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[2]  I. Gormezano,et al.  CONDITIONING OF THE NICTITATING MEMBRANE OF THE RABBIT AS A FUNCTION OF CS-US INTERVAL. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  J. Prados,et al.  Recovery effects after extinction in the Morris swimming pool navigation task , 2003, Learning & behavior.

[4]  L. Kamin.  Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning , 1967 .

[5]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Competition between landmarks in spatial learning: The role of proximity to the goal , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[6]  N. J. Mackintosh,et al.  Blocking and Overshadowing between Intra-Maze and Extra-Maze Cues: A Test of the Independence of Locale and Guidance Learning , 1985 .

[7]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Generalisation: mechanistic and functional explanations , 2002, Animal Cognition.

[8]  Victoria D. Chamizo,et al.  Spatial Learning: Conditions and Basic Effects , 2002 .

[9]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Effect of Absolute Spatial Proximity between a Landmark and a Goal. , 2004 .

[11]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. , 1998 .

[12]  R. Passingham.  The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[13]  J W Rudy,et al.  Rats with damage to the hippocampal-formation are impaired on the transverse-patterning problem but not on elemental discriminations. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Spatial generalization in honeybees confirms Shepard's law , 1999, Behavioural Processes.

[15]  K. Cheng.  The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. , 1989 .

[16]  R. Morris.  Spatial Localization Does Not Require the Presence of Local Cues , 1981 .

[17]  N. Mackintosh.  The psychology of animal learning , 1974 .

[18]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Spatial contiguity facilitates Pavlovian second-order conditioning. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[19]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Blocking in the spatial domain. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[20]  M. A. Saavedra.  Pavlovian compound conditioning in the rabbit , 1975 .

[21]  A. Bennett,et al.  Spatial memory in a food storing corvid , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[22]  V. D. Chamizo.  Acquisition of Knowledge about Spatial Location: Assessing the Generality of the Mechanism of Learning , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[23]  R. Sutherland,et al.  A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[24]  T. Collett,et al.  The use of visual landmarks by honeybees: Bees weight landmarks according to their distance from the goal , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[25]  William Rowan,et al.  The Study of Instinct , 1953 .

[26]  N. Mackintosh.  Overshadowing and stimulus intensity , 1976, Animal learning & behavior.

[27]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[28]  K. Haberlandt,et al.  Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. , 1968, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[29]  T J Testa.  Effects of similarity of location and temporal intensity pattern of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli on the acquisition of conditioned suppresion in rats. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[30]  K Cheng,et al.  Shepard's Universal Law Supported by Honeybees in Spatial Generalization , 2000, Psychological science.

[31]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Overshadowing in the spatial domain , 1999 .

[32]  Victoria D. Chamizo,et al.  Generalization gradients in a navigation task with rats , 2006 .

[33]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Hippocampal place units in the freely moving rat: Why they fire where they fire , 1978, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons′ Use of Landmarks Presented in Digitized Images , 1994 .

[35]  D. Whitteridge.  Lectures on Conditioned Reflexes , 1942, Nature.

[36]  J. Prados,et al.  Locating an invisible goal in a water maze requires at least two landmarks , 1998, Psychobiology.

[37]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Spatial generalization and peak shift in humans , 2002 .

[38]  A. A. Artigas,et al.  Human overshadowing in a virtual pool: Simple guidance is a good competitor against locale learning , 2003 .

[39]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Spatial peak shift and generalization in pigeons. , 1997 .

[40]  A. Black,et al.  Stimulus control of spatial behavior on the eight-arm maze in rats ☆ ☆☆ , 1980 .