The Emergence of Hierarchical Structure in Human Language

We propose a novel account for the emergence of human language syntax. Like many evolutionary innovations, language arose from the adventitious combination of two pre-existing, simpler systems that had been evolved for other functional tasks. The first system, Type E(xpression), is found in birdsong, where the same song marks territory, mating availability, and similar “expressive” functions. The second system, Type L(exical), has been suggestively found in non-human primate calls and in honeybee waggle dances, where it demarcates predicates with one or more “arguments,” such as combinations of calls in monkeys or compass headings set to sun position in honeybees. We show that human language syntax is composed of two layers that parallel these two independently evolved systems: an “E” layer resembling the Type E system of birdsong and an “L” layer providing words. The existence of the “E” and “L” layers can be confirmed using standard linguistic methodology. Each layer, E and L, when considered separately, is characterizable as a finite state system, as observed in several non-human species. When the two systems are put together they interact, yielding the unbounded, non-finite state, hierarchical structure that serves as the hallmark of full-fledged human language syntax. In this way, we account for the appearance of a novel function, language, within a conventional Darwinian framework, along with its apparently unique emergence in a single species.

[1]  ROBERT C. BERWICK,et al.  All you Need is Merge : Biology , Computation , and Language from the Bottom-up , 2014 .

[2]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[3]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Production, usage, and comprehension in animal vocalizations , 2010, Brain and Language.

[6]  K. Okanoya,et al.  Statistical and Prosodic Cues for Song Segmentation Learning by Bengalese Finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) , 2010 .

[7]  Alaa A. Kharbouch,et al.  Three models for the description of language , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  Continental Patterns of Song Variability in Zonotrichia capensis: Some Possible Ecological Correlates , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Steven Abney,et al.  The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect , 1972 .

[10]  A. Friederici The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Shigeru Miyagawa,et al.  Why Agree ? Why Move ? Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse-Configurational Languages , 2009 .

[12]  P. Marler,et al.  Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. , 1980, Science.

[13]  R. Menzel,et al.  The flight paths of honeybees recruited by the waggle dance , 2005, Nature.

[14]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  L. Rizzi The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[16]  R. Berwick,et al.  Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind: Language as a natural object , 2000 .

[18]  R. Berwick,et al.  A Bird’s Eye View of Human Language Evolution , 2012, Front. Evol. Neurosci..

[19]  Jean-Louis Dessalles,et al.  Why We Talk: The Evolutionary Origins of Language , 2007 .

[20]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar , 2008 .

[21]  Roger Mundry,et al.  Song repertoire size is correlated with body measures and arrival date in common nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  Language evolution: Semantic combinations in primate calls , 2006, Nature.

[23]  P. Marler Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels? , 1970, American scientist.

[24]  Timothy Q. Gentner,et al.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds , 2006, Nature.

[25]  Maggie Tallerman,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution , 2013 .

[26]  Wolfram Hinzen,et al.  On the Absence of X-within-X Recursion in Human Grammar , 2012, Linguistic Inquiry.

[27]  W. Strange Evolution of language. , 1984, JAMA.

[28]  C. Scharff,et al.  Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Primate Cognition , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[30]  K. Zuberbühler,et al.  Meaningful call combinations in a non-human primate , 2008, Current Biology.

[31]  Noam Chomsky Three Factors in Language Design , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[32]  R. G. Kent,et al.  Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin , 1923 .

[33]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Birdsong neurolinguistics: songbird context-free grammar claim is premature , 2012, Neuroreport.