On socio-cognitive processes that promote learning from peer collaboration and how immediate transfer tests cannot always detect their effects

Research into the benefits of collaborative work on learning have shifted from questions regarding whether it promotes learning, to research into the conditions that promote learning and the identification of processes that make collaborative group settings particularly effective. In this symposium we will present findings from recent research into a number of socio-cognitive processes that have been found to foster conceptual gains following group learning. The papers that will be presented as part of this symposium will focus on three different phenomena: argumentation, production feedback and the incubation effect of collaboration. In addition, these studies also show that the effects of collaborative learning may not be apparent immediately following interaction, but need some time to materialize. This finding emphasizes the need for multiple and delayed assessment, as well as alternative assessment tools, such as prospective (instead of retrospective) measures of learning.

[1]  Andrew Tolmie,et al.  Productive interaction in the context of computer-supported collaborative learning in science , 1999 .

[2]  Sandra Y. Okita,et al.  When Observation Beats Doing: Learning by Teaching , 2006, ICLS.

[3]  M. Azmitia,et al.  Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning , 1993 .

[4]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Observing Tutorial Dialogues Collaboratively: Insights About Human Tutoring Effectiveness From Vicarious Learning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Christine Howe,et al.  Chance favours only the prepared mind: Incubation and the delayed effects of peer collaboration. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[6]  E. Michael Nussbaum,et al.  Argument and conceptual engagement , 2003 .

[7]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .

[8]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The Effects of Monological and Dialogical Argumentation on Concept Learning in Evolutionary Theory , 2007 .

[9]  A. C. Kruger Peer collaboration: conflict, cooperation, or both? , 1993 .

[10]  M. Baker,et al.  Computer-Mediated Epistemic Dialogue: Explanation and Argumentation as Vehicles for Understanding Scientific Notions , 2002 .

[11]  J. Osborne,et al.  Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education , 2002 .

[12]  John F. Kihlstrom,et al.  Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. , 1996 .

[13]  G. Salomon Distributed cognitions : psychological and educational considerations , 1997 .

[14]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept‐mapping techniques* , 2001 .

[15]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Argumentation and Reasoning , 2010 .

[16]  W. Doise,et al.  Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances , 1978 .

[17]  Brigid Barron When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[18]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The Emergence of Abstract Representations in Dyad Problem Solving , 1995 .

[19]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Pedagogical Agents as Social Models to Influence Learner Attitudes , 2007 .

[20]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Two Wrongs May Make a Right ... If They Argue Together! , 2000 .

[21]  W. Damon,et al.  Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education , 1989 .

[22]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Chapter 3: Rethinking Transfer: A Simple Proposal With Multiple Implications , 1999 .

[23]  N. Whitsed Learning and teaching. , 2003, Health information and libraries journal.

[24]  C. Howe,et al.  Task design as an influence on dialogue and learning: primary school group work with object flotation , 1993 .

[25]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[26]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Peer Interaction, Problem-Solving, and Cognition: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. , 1989 .

[27]  W. Damon Peer education: The untapped potential , 1984 .

[28]  A. King,et al.  Effects of Guided Cooperative Questioning on Children's Knowledge Construction. , 1993 .

[29]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  LEARNING BY TEACHING: A NEW AGENT PARADIGM FOR EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE , 2005, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[30]  Stephanie D. Teasley The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. , 1995 .

[31]  M. Limón On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal , 2001 .

[32]  B. Schneuwly Cultural learning is cultural. [A commentary on Tomasello, Krugner and Ratner's "Cultural learning" Peer commentary by B. Schneuwly] , 1993 .

[33]  Andrew Tolmie,et al.  The acquisition of conceptual knowledge in science by primary school children : group interaction and the understanding of motion down an incline , 1992 .