A Dynamic Robotic Actuator with Variable Physical Stiffness and Damping.

This study is part of research aiming at increasing the range of dynamic tasks for teleoperated field robotics in order to allow operators to use the full range of human motions without being limited by the dynamics of the robotic manipulator. A new variable impedance actuator (VIA) was designed, capable of reproducing motions through teleoperation from precise positioning tasks to highly dynamic tasks. The design requirements based on previous human user studies were a stiffness changing time of 50 ms, a peak output velocity of 20 rad/s and variable damping allowing to suppress undesired oscillations. This is a unique combination of features that was not met by other VIAs. The new design has three motors in parallel configuration: two responsible for changing the VIA's neutral position and effective stiffness through a sliding pivot point lever mechanism, and the third acting as variable damper. A prototype was built and its performance measured with an effective stiffness changing time of 50 to 120 ms for small to large stiffness steps, nominal output velocity of 16 rad/s and a variable damper with a damping torque from 0 to 3 Nm. Its effective stiffness range is 0.2 to 313 Nm/rad. This concludes that the new actuator is particularly suitable for highly dynamic tasks. At the same time, the new actuator is also very versatile, making it especially interesting for teleoperation and human-robot collaboration.

[1]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  Variable Stiffness Actuators: Review on Design and Components , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[2]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Optimality principles in variable stiffness control: The VSA hammer , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A variable physical damping actuator (VPDA) for compliant robotic joints , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  A new variable stiffness design: Matching requirements of the next robot generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[6]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  VSA-CubeBot: A modular variable stiffness platform for multiple degrees of freedom robots , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  A. Milecki,et al.  Investigation and control of magneto–rheological fluid dampers , 2001 .

[8]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  A New Actuation Approach for Human Friendly Robot Design , 2002, ISER.

[9]  William R. Hamel,et al.  Robotics in Hazardous Applications , 2016, Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2nd Ed..

[10]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  AwAS-II: A new Actuator with Adjustable Stiffness based on the novel principle of adaptable pivot point and variable lever ratio , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Werner Friedl,et al.  FAS A flexible antagonistic spring element for a high performance over , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  Andre Schiele,et al.  Increasing Impact by Mechanical Resonance for Teleoperated Hammering , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[13]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A compact compliant actuator (CompAct™) with variable physical damping , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Oliver Eiberger,et al.  The DLR FSJ: Energy based design of a variable stiffness joint , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Intrinsically elastic robots: The key to human like performance , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[16]  Joel E. Chestnutt,et al.  The Actuator With Mechanically Adjustable Series Compliance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[17]  Sethu Vijayakumar,et al.  Optimal variable stiffness control: formulation and application to explosive movement tasks , 2012, Auton. Robots.

[18]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Playing it safe [human-friendly robots] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[19]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Kick it with elasticity: Safety and performance in human-robot soccer , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..