Integrating Structure to Protein-Protein Interaction Networks That Drive Metastasis to Brain and Lung in Breast Cancer

Blocking specific protein interactions can lead to human diseases. Accordingly, protein interactions and the structural knowledge on interacting surfaces of proteins (interfaces) have an important role in predicting the genotype-phenotype relationship. We have built the phenotype specific sub-networks of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) involving the relevant genes responsible for lung and brain metastasis from primary tumor in breast cancer. First, we selected the PPIs most relevant to metastasis causing genes (seed genes), by using the “guilt-by-association” principle. Then, we modeled structures of the interactions whose complex forms are not available in Protein Databank (PDB). Finally, we mapped mutations to interface structures (real and modeled), in order to spot the interactions that might be manipulated by these mutations. Functional analyses performed on these sub-networks revealed the potential relationship between immune system-infectious diseases and lung metastasis progression, but this connection was not observed significantly in the brain metastasis. Besides, structural analyses showed that some PPI interfaces in both metastasis sub-networks are originating from microbial proteins, which in turn were mostly related with cell adhesion. Cell adhesion is a key mechanism in metastasis, therefore these PPIs may be involved in similar molecular pathways that are shared by infectious disease and metastasis. Finally, by mapping the mutations and amino acid variations on the interface regions of the proteins in the metastasis sub-networks we found evidence for some mutations to be involved in the mechanisms differentiating the type of the metastasis.

[1]  Michael Schroeder,et al.  Old friends in new guise: repositioning of known drugs with structural bioinformatics , 2011, Briefings Bioinform..

[2]  J. Collins,et al.  A network biology approach to prostate cancer , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Fast and accurate modeling of protein–protein interactions by combining template‐interface‐based docking with flexible refinement , 2012, Proteins.

[4]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Jeffrey T. Chang,et al.  Oncogenic pathway signatures in human cancers as a guide to targeted therapies , 2006, Nature.

[6]  S. Haile Cancer metastasis and in vivo dissemination of tissue-dwelling pathogens: extrapolation of mechanisms and exchange of treatment strategies thereof. , 2008, Medical hypotheses.

[7]  Bindu Nanduri,et al.  HPIDB - a unified resource for host-pathogen interactions , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  Andy J. Minn,et al.  Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung , 2005, Nature.

[9]  S. Shin,et al.  The chemical synthesis and binding affinity to the EGF receptor of the EGF‐like domain of heparin‐binding EGF‐like growth factor (HB‐EGF) , 2003, Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society.

[10]  María Martín,et al.  Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  PRISM: protein-protein interaction prediction by structural matching. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  M. Mareel,et al.  Clinical, cellular, and molecular aspects of cancer invasion. , 2003, Physiological reviews.

[13]  The UniProt Consortium,et al.  Update on activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2013 , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  M. Mareel,et al.  Metastasis of Entamoeba histolytica compared to colon cancer: one more step in invasion. , 1994, Invasion and Metastasis.

[15]  J. Votaw,et al.  Silencing of CXCR4 blocks breast cancer metastasis. , 2005, Cancer research.

[16]  Gary D Bader,et al.  BIND--The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[18]  E. Orozco,et al.  Invasion and metastasis mechanisms in Entamoeba histolytica and cancer cells. Some common cellular and molecular features. , 1994, Mutation research.

[19]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Protein–protein interaction sites are hot spots for disease‐associated nonsynonymous SNPs , 2012, Human mutation.

[20]  K. Miyamoto,et al.  Solution structure of epiregulin and the effect of its C‐terminal domain for receptor binding affinity , 2003, FEBS letters.

[21]  S. Elledge,et al.  Expression profiling of medulloblastoma: PDGFRA and the RAS/MAPK pathway as therapeutic targets for metastatic disease , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[22]  Andrew C. R. Martin Databases and ontologies Mapping PDB chains to UniProtKB entries , 2005 .

[23]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Breast cancer statistics, 2011 , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[24]  Pornpimol Charoentong,et al.  ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks , 2009, Bioinform..

[25]  Christina Kiel,et al.  Analyzing protein interaction networks using structural information. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[26]  Tao Cai,et al.  Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary , 2005, Bioinform..

[27]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Predicting protein-protein interactions on a proteome scale by matching evolutionary and structural similarities at interfaces using PRISM , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[28]  E. Guney,et al.  Exploiting Protein-Protein Interaction Networks for Genome-Wide Disease-Gene Prioritization , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  J. Piffaretti,et al.  Is there a common definition for invasiveness? Report from an informal workshop on Interdisciplinary Aspects of Invasiveness, March 9-11, 1989, Neggio/Lugano, Switzerland. , 1990, Invasion and Metastasis.

[30]  Kornelia Polyak,et al.  Very High Frequency of Hypermethylated Genes in Breast Cancer Metastasis to the Bone, Brain, and Lung , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[31]  Christie S. Chang,et al.  The BioGRID interaction database: 2013 update , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[32]  P. Yeyati,et al.  Mechanisms of non-Mendelian inheritance in genetic disease. , 2004, Human molecular genetics.

[33]  Ko-Jiunn Liu,et al.  The Role of Enolase in Tissue Invasion and Metastasis of Pathogens and Tumor Cells , 2007 .

[34]  R. Sharan,et al.  Protein networks in disease. , 2008, Genome research.

[35]  Mingming Jia,et al.  COSMIC: mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[36]  Adam J. Smith,et al.  The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[37]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Enriching the human apoptosis pathway by predicting the structures of protein-protein complexes. , 2012, Journal of structural biology.

[38]  T. Mcclanahan,et al.  Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis , 2001, Nature.

[39]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Sandhya Rani,et al.  Human Protein Reference Database—2009 update , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[41]  Baldomero Oliva,et al.  Biana: a software framework for compiling biological interactions and analyzing networks , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[42]  J. Skolnick,et al.  TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  Haiyuan Yu,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of protein networks provides insight into human genetic disease , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  Maricel G. Kann,et al.  Protein interactions and disease: computational approaches to uncover the etiology of diseases , 2007, Briefings Bioinform..

[45]  T. Ideker,et al.  Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[46]  Livia Perfetto,et al.  MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2012 update , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[47]  W. Gerald,et al.  Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain , 2009, Nature.

[48]  Marc Ladanyi,et al.  WNT/TCF Signaling through LEF1 and HOXB9 Mediates Lung Adenocarcinoma Metastasis , 2009, Cell.

[49]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  A Strategy Based on Protein-Protein Interface Motifs May Help in Identifying Drug Off-Targets , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[50]  E. Ruoslahti,et al.  Metadherin, a cell surface protein in breast tumors that mediates lung metastasis. , 2004, Cancer cell.

[51]  Antony W Burgess,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor: mechanisms of activation and signalling. , 2003, Experimental cell research.

[52]  A. Jemal,et al.  Breast Cancer Statistics , 2013 .

[53]  Hemant Ishwaran,et al.  Signalling pathway for RKIP and Let‐7 regulates and predicts metastatic breast cancer , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[54]  J. Peterse,et al.  Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[55]  A. Fraser,et al.  Predicting genetic modifier loci using functional gene networks. , 2010, Genome research.

[56]  Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[57]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Network-based global inference of human disease genes , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[58]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  Identification of computational hot spots in protein interfaces: combining solvent accessibility and inter-residue potentials improves the accuracy , 2009, Bioinform..

[59]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization , 2010, Bioinform..

[60]  David A. Lee,et al.  New functional families (FunFams) in CATH to improve the mapping of conserved functional sites to 3D structures , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[61]  Jiang Qian,et al.  TiGER: A database for tissue-specific gene expression and regulation , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[62]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[63]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Network-based strategies can help mono- and poly-pharmacology drug discovery: a systems biology view. , 2014, Current pharmaceutical design.

[64]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[65]  W. Boron,et al.  Medical physiology : a cellular and molecular approach , 2002 .

[66]  Maria Victoria Schneider,et al.  MINT: a Molecular INTeraction database. , 2002, FEBS letters.

[67]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Human proteome-scale structural modeling of E2-E3 interactions exploiting interface motifs. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[68]  Rafael C. Jimenez,et al.  The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012 , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[69]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[70]  Ozlem Keskin,et al.  PRISM: protein interactions by structural matching , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[71]  Stéphanie Pérot,et al.  Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: a paradigm shift in drug discovery. , 2010, Drug discovery today.

[72]  B. Zetter,et al.  Adhesion molecules in tumor metastasis. , 1993, Seminars in cancer biology.

[73]  L. Borsig,et al.  Cancer Cell Adhesion and Metastasis: Selectins, Integrins, and the Inhibitory Potential of Heparins , 2012, International journal of cell biology.

[74]  C. Cordon-Cardo,et al.  A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[75]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  The MIPS mammalian protein?Cprotein interaction database , 2005, Bioinform..

[76]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Drug Discovery Using Chemical Systems Biology: Identification of the Protein-Ligand Binding Network To Explain the Side Effects of CETP Inhibitors , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..