Gender neutrality improved completion rate for all

ABSTRACT The purpose of the present study was to investigate if we could improve retention by redesigning an online programming course from a gender perspective, while maintaining the focus on preferable and sustainable learning approaches. The study builds on results from an earlier study that investigated the relationship between approaches to learning and course completion and involves 1067 students that responded to the short version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) in 2010, 2012 and 2013. Three principles for course material design were identified; gender neutral and non-biased messages, emphasize the interdisciplinary approach and link to everyday examples. Responses to ASSIST were analysed in relation to performed changes in the course literature from a gender perspective. The probability to complete the course increased with 7% points for all students, in particular for men, and decreased for students with a high score in surface approach to learning, especially among women.

[1]  A. Dainty,et al.  Gender stereotypes among women engineering and technology students in the UK: lessons from career choice narratives , 2012 .

[2]  Dennis E. Egan,et al.  Handbook of Human Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[3]  Nanette Veilleux,et al.  The relationship between belonging and ability in computer science , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[4]  Catherine T. Amelink,et al.  A comparison of educational factors promoting or discouraging the intent to remain in engineering by gender , 2011 .

[5]  Sally Fincher,et al.  Computer Science Education Research , 2004 .

[6]  Richard T. Snodgrass,et al.  The Emerging Role of Self-Perception in Student Intentions , 2015, SIGCSE.

[7]  Steve M. Easterbrook,et al.  Scaling up Women in Computing Initiatives: What Can We Learn from a Public Policy Perspective? , 2015, ICER.

[8]  Minna Salminen Karlsson.  Gender-inclusive computer engineering education : Two attempts at curriculum change , 2002 .

[9]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Motivational factors, gender and engineering education , 2013 .

[10]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Bernard P. Veldkamp,et al.  Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  Women in Industrial Engineering: Stereotypes, Persistence, and Perspectives , 2012 .

[13]  W. Faulkner.  `Nuts and Bolts and People' , 2007 .

[14]  Sylvia Beyer,et al.  Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades , 2014, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[15]  Daniel Zingaro,et al.  Impact of Student Achievement Goals on CS1 Outcomes , 2016, SIGCSE.

[16]  Amy Pearl,et al.  Women in computing , 1995, CACM.

[17]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Motivational Factors in Students' Approaches to Learning , 1988 .

[18]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Subtyping and Subgrouping: Processes for the Prevention and Promotion of Stereotype Change , 2001 .

[19]  Sherry Marx,et al.  Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering , 2014 .

[20]  P. Pintrich,et al.  An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[21]  S. Sturman.  'Women in Computing' as Problematic: Gender, Ethics and Identity in University Computer Science Education , 2010 .

[22]  Minna Salminen-Karlsson,et al.  The problem in the eye of the beholder: Working with gender reforms in computer engineering , 2011 .

[23]  Amanda B. Diekman,et al.  Seeking Congruity Between Goals and Roles , 2010, Psychological science.

[24]  Brenda Cantwell Wilson,et al.  A Study of Factors Promoting Success in Computer Science Including Gender Differences , 2002, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[25]  Julie E. Mills,et al.  Gender Inclusive Engineering Education , 2010 .

[26]  Andrew N. Meltzoff,et al.  Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Lauren Sele.  Talking Nerdy: The Invisibility of Female Computer Nerds in Popular Culture and the Subsequent Fewer Number of Women and Girls in the Computer Sciences , 2012 .

[28]  K. Beddoes.  Feminist methodologies and engineering education research , 2013 .

[29]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[30]  F. Cano,et al.  University students' achievement goals and approaches to learning in mathematics. , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[31]  Maria Öhrstedt,et al.  Studieapproach, stress, studieresultat och förmåga att bedöma egen prestation , 2009 .

[32]  Åge Diseth,et al.  Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement , 2011 .

[33]  Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima,et al.  The Influence of Computer‐based Model's Race and Gender on Female Students' Attitudes and Beliefs Towards Engineering , 2010 .

[34]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the clubhouse: the Carnegie Mellon experience , 2002, SGCS.

[35]  Olle Bälter,et al.  The effect of short formative diagnostic web quizzes with minimal feedback , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[36]  William Aspray,et al.  A Critical Review of the Research on Women's Participation in Postsecondary Computing Education , 2008 .

[37]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Implications of Gender Consciousness for Students in Information Technology , 2008 .

[38]  Carol Frieze,et al.  From difference to diversity: including women in the changing face of computing , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[39]  Chuck Huff,et al.  Gender, software design, and occupational equity , 2002, SGCS.

[40]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  ‘They're not girly girls’: an exploration of quantitative and qualitative data on engineering and gender in higher education , 2012 .

[41]  M. Christie,et al.  Gender equity in higher education: why and how? A case study of gender issues in a science faculty , 2006 .

[42]  Wendy Doubé,et al.  Gender and stereotypes in motivation to study computer programming for careers in multimedia , 2012, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[43]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[44]  D. Evangelou,et al.  Using profiles of person—thing orientation to examine the underrepresentation of women in engineering in three cultural contexts , 2012 .

[45]  Olle Bälter,et al.  Student Approaches to Learning in Relation to Online Course Completion , 2013 .