Adaptive Vision-based Missile Guidance in the Presence of Evasive Target Maneuvers

Abstract A nonlinear adaptive visual servo guidance law is presented for a bank-to-turn (BTT) missile airframe that achieves near zero miss distance interception of a target undergoing unknown evasive maneuvers. The controller is developed assuming unknown missile linear velocity and target depth measurements; hence can be regarded as a pure vision-based guidance law. By approximating the unknown, scaled relative velocity via power series expansion, a continuous adaptive parameter update law is developed to compensate for the unknown missile-target relative velocity and the depth measurements. In addition, robust elements are included in the guidance law to compensate for external disturbances and parameter identification errors. A rigorous Lyapunov-based stability analysis is utilized to prove uniformly ultimately bounded (UUB) stability of the system states, and high-fidelity numerical simulation results are provided to verify the performance of the proposed missile guidance law.

[1]  Warren E. Dixon,et al.  Adaptive set-point control of robotic manipulators with amplitude-limited control inputs , 2000, Robotica.

[2]  Warren Boord,et al.  New Approach to Guidance Law Design , 2003 .

[3]  George M Siouris,et al.  Missile Guidance and Control Systems , 2004 .

[4]  Andrey V. Savkin,et al.  Precision missile guidance using radar/multiple-video sensor fusion via communication channels with bit-rate constraints , 2006, Autom..

[5]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Good features to track , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[6]  Yuri B. Shtessel,et al.  Smooth second-order sliding modes: Missile guidance application , 2007, Autom..

[7]  Yu Yao,et al.  The design of LOS reconstruction filter for strap-down imaging seeker , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[8]  Prabhakar R. Pagilla,et al.  Adaptive Control of Mechanical Systems With Time-Varying Parameters and Disturbances , 2004 .

[9]  Paul Zarchan,et al.  Tactical and strategic missile guidance , 1990 .

[10]  M R Ananthasayanam,et al.  Nonlinear Observer State Estimation From Seeker Measurements and Seeker-Radar Measurements Fusion , 2005 .

[11]  Jacob Willem Langelaan State estimation for autonomous flight in cluttered environments , 2006 .

[12]  James P. Ostrowski,et al.  Visual servoing with dynamics: control of an unmanned blimp , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[13]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Visually guided landing of an unmanned aerial vehicle , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Mohammad Ali Nekoui,et al.  Integration of imaging seeker control in a visually guided missile , 2010, IEEE ICCA 2010.

[15]  H. A. Luther,et al.  Applied numerical methods , 1969 .

[16]  Erik Blasch,et al.  Unmanned vehicles come of age: The DARPA grand challenge , 2006, Computer.

[17]  Ji Jun,et al.  Three-dimensional guidance law with terminal impact angle constraint , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[18]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[19]  D. J. East,et al.  Guided Weapon Control Systems , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[20]  M. Corless,et al.  Continuous state feedback guaranteeing uniform ultimate boundedness for uncertain dynamic systems , 1981 .

[21]  W.E. Dixon Adaptive regulation of amplitude limited robot manipulators with uncertain kinematics and dynamics , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[22]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  A new partitioned approach to image-based visual servo control , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..