Effects of sequence length and structure on implicit serial learning

Some data suggest that, as in explicit serial learning, longer sequences are more difficult to learn implicitly. These findings have been used to support the inference that implicit learning is capacity-limited. However, investigations of the effect of sequence length on implicit learning have confounded sequence structure with sequence length. These factors were manipulated independently in 3 experiments using a serial reaction time task. The results showed that sequence structure, not sequence length, largely determines the extent of sequence learning.

[1]  Paul C. Vitz,et al.  A coded element model of the perceptual processing of sequential stimuli. , 1969 .

[2]  M. A. Stadler,et al.  Role of attention in implicit learning. , 1995 .

[3]  S. Lovett,et al.  Dimensions of perceived social support in clinically depressed and nondepressed female caregivers. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[4]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[5]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Operationism and the concept of perception. , 1956, Psychological review.

[6]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Attention and awareness in sequence learning , 1993 .

[7]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[8]  P. J. Jennings,et al.  Attention in the representation of sequence: Experiment and theory ☆ , 1992 .

[9]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. , 1994 .

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  Procedural learning in Parkinson's disease and cerebellar degeneration , 1993, Annals of neurology.

[11]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Frank Restle,et al.  Theory of Serial Pattern Learning: Structural Trees. , 1970 .

[13]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  Prediction and Entropy of Printed English , 1951 .

[14]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention , 1989 .

[15]  J. H. Howard,et al.  Adult age differences in the rate of learning serial patterns: evidence from direct and indirect tests. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[16]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning , 1996 .

[17]  P. Frensch,et al.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[18]  D. Howard,et al.  Age differences in learning serial patterns: direct versus indirect measures. , 1989, Psychology and Aging.

[19]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Statistical structure and implicit serial learning. , 1992 .

[20]  D. Shanks,et al.  Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  D. Howard,et al.  Serial pattern learning by event observation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Jeff Miller,et al.  A warning about median reaction time , 1988 .

[23]  L. Jacoby.  Remembering the data: analyzing interactive processes in reading , 1983 .

[24]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Implicit serial learning: Questions inspired by Hebb (1961) , 1993, Memory & cognition.