Distributed Information Filters for MAV Cooperative Localization

This paper introduces a new approach to the problem of simultaneously localizing a team of micro aerial vehicles (MAV) equipped with inertial sensors able to monitor their motion and with exteroceptive sensors. The method estimates a delayed state containing the trajectories of all the MAVs. The estimation is based on an Extended Information Filter whose implementation is distributed over the team members. The paper introduces two contributions. The former is a trick which allows exploiting the information contained in the inertial sensor data in a distributed manner. The latter is the use of a projection filter which allows exploiting the information contained in the geometrical constraints which arise as soon as the MAV orientations are characterized by unitary quaternions. The performance of the proposed strategy is evaluated with synthetic data. In particular, the benefit of the previous two contributions is pointed out.

[1]  Aníbal Ollero,et al.  Delayed-state information filter for cooperative decentralized tracking , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Identifying and localizing robots in a multi-robot system environment , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[3]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Localization for mobile robot teams using maximum likelihood estimation , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  Closed-form solution for absolute scale velocity determination combining inertial measurements and a single feature correspondence , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  A. Vedaldi,et al.  Inertial Structure From Motion with Autocalibration , 2007 .

[6]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Heterogeneous Teams of Modular Robots for Mapping and Exploration , 2000, Auton. Robots.

[7]  Hanumant Singh,et al.  Exactly Sparse Delayed-State Filters for View-Based SLAM , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[8]  Stergios I. Roumeliotis,et al.  Propagation of Uncertainty in Cooperative Multirobot Localization: Analysis and Experimental Results , 2004, Auton. Robots.

[9]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Probabilistic robotics , 2002, CACM.

[10]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  iSAM: Incremental Smoothing and Mapping , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[11]  Stergios I. Roumeliotis,et al.  Distributed multirobot localization , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  A non-divergent estimation algorithm in the presence of unknown correlations , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[13]  Keith Yu Kit Leung,et al.  Decentralized Localization of Sparsely-Communicating Robot Networks: A Centralized-Equivalent Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  J. Shewchuk.  An Introduction to the Conjugate Gradient Method Without the Agonizing Pain , 1994 .

[15]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  A Probabilistic Approach to Collaborative Multi-Robot Localization , 2000, Auton. Robots.

[16]  Camillo J. Taylor,et al.  A bounded uncertainty approach to multi-robot localization , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[17]  Gregory Dudek,et al.  Multi-robot cooperative localization: a study of trade-offs between efficiency and accuracy , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Stergios I. Roumeliotis,et al.  Optimal Sensing Strategies for Mobile Robot Formations: Resource-Constrained Localization , 2005, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[19]  Ryo Kurazume,et al.  Cooperative positioning with multiple robots , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.