Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning

Infants acquire language with remarkable speed, although little is known about the mechanisms that underlie the acquisition process. Studies of the phonetic units of language have shown that early in life, infants are capable of discerning differences among the phonetic units of all languages, including native- and foreign-language sounds. Between 6 and 12 mo of age, the ability to discriminate foreign-language phonetic units sharply declines. In two studies, we investigate the necessary and sufficient conditions for reversing this decline in foreign-language phonetic perception. In Experiment 1, 9-mo-old American infants were exposed to native Mandarin Chinese speakers in 12 laboratory sessions. A control group also participated in 12 language sessions but heard only English. Subsequent tests of Mandarin speech perception demonstrated that exposure to Mandarin reversed the decline seen in the English control group. In Experiment 2, infants were exposed to the same foreign-language speakers and materials via audiovisual or audio-only recordings. The results demonstrated that exposure to recorded Mandarin, without interpersonal interaction, had no effect. Between 9 and 10 mo of age, infants show phonetic learning from live, but not prerecorded, exposure to a foreign language, suggesting a learning process that does not require long-term listening and is enhanced by social interaction.

[1]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Speech Perception in Infants , 1971, Science.

[2]  A. Liberman,et al.  An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English , 1975 .

[3]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[4]  L. Streeter Language perception of 2-month-old infants shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience , 1976, Nature.

[5]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. , 1981, Child development.

[6]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. , 1982, Science.

[7]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[8]  A. Fernald,et al.  Expanded Intonation Contours in Mothers' Speech to Newborns. , 1984 .

[9]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .

[10]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[11]  L. Baptista,et al.  Song development in the white-crowned sparrow: social factors and sex differences , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[13]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech , 1987 .

[14]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language: Support for universal prosodic features in motherese. , 1988 .

[15]  P. Kuhl Auditory perception and the evolution of speech , 1988 .

[16]  L. A. Eales The influences of visual and vocal interaction on song learning in Zebra finches , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  G. Butterworth,et al.  What minds have in common is space : Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy , 1991 .

[18]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[19]  P. Adret,et al.  Operant conditioning, song learning and imprinting to taped song in the zebra finch , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Perceptual strategies in prelingual speech segmentation , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[21]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  P. Kuhl Learning and representation in speech and language , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  R. Aslin,et al.  Developmental differences in infant attention to the spectral properties of infant-directed speech. , 1994, Child development.

[24]  C. Moore,et al.  Joint attention : its origins and role in development , 1995 .

[25]  A. Meltzoff Understanding the Intentions of Others: Re-Enactment of Intended Acts by 18-Month-Old Children. , 1995, Developmental psychology.

[26]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Divergent developmental patterns for infants' perception of two nonnative consonant contrasts , 1995 .

[27]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training , 1996, Science.

[28]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[29]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Infant vocalizations in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech , 1996, Science.

[31]  J. Pind The Discovery of Spoken Language, Peter W. Jusczyk (Ed.). MIT Press (1997), ISBN 0 262 10058 4 , 1997 .

[32]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. , 1997, Science.

[33]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[34]  M. Hauser,et al.  The design of animal communication , 1999 .

[35]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[38]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  The Design of Animal Communication , 2000, Adapt. Behav..

[39]  P. Kuhl A new view of language acquisition. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  D. Singer,et al.  Handbook of Children and the Media , 2000 .

[41]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Language/Culture/Mind/Brain , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[42]  C. Nelson,et al.  Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience , 2001 .

[43]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  Dynamics of the Vocal Imitation Process: How a Zebra Finch Learns Its Song , 2001, Science.

[44]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The importance of eyes: how infants interpret adult looking behavior. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[45]  J. Saffran Constraints on Statistical Language Learning , 2002 .

[46]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination , 2002, Cognition.

[47]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[48]  Bart de Boer,et al.  Investigating the role of infant-directed speech with a computer model , 2003 .

[49]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Fast Track , 2020, Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technology International.

[50]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes , 2003, Cognition.