The Role of Temporally Coarse Form Processing during Binocular Rivalry

Presenting the eyes with spatially mismatched images causes a phenomenon known as binocular rivalry—a fluctuation of awareness whereby each eye's image alternately determines perception. Binocular rivalry is used to study interocular conflict resolution and the formation of conscious awareness from retinal images. Although the spatial determinants of rivalry have been well-characterized, the temporal determinants are still largely unstudied. We confirm a previous observation that conflicting images do not need to be presented continuously or simultaneously to elicit binocular rivalry. This process has a temporal limit of about 350 ms, which is an order of magnitude larger than the visual system's temporal resolution. We characterize this temporal limit of binocular rivalry by showing that it is independent of low-level information such as interocular timing differences, contrast-reversals, stimulus energy, and eye-of-origin information. This suggests the temporal factors maintaining rivalry relate more to higher-level form information, than to low-level visual information. Systematically comparing the role of form and motion—the processing of which may be assigned to ventral and dorsal visual pathways, respectively—reveals that this temporal limit is determined by form conflict rather than motion conflict. Together, our findings demonstrate that binocular conflict resolution depends on temporally coarse form-based processing, possibly originating in the ventral visual pathway.

[1]  M Coltheart,et al.  The persistences of vision. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  J M Wolfe,et al.  Influence of Spatial Frequency, Luminance, and Duration on Binocular Rivalry and Abnormal Fusion of Briefly Presented Dichoptic Stimuli , 1983, Perception.

[3]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Jochen Braun,et al.  Contrast thresholds for component motion with full and poor attention. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[5]  Alan W Freeman,et al.  Multistage model for binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Sheng He,et al.  Competing Global Representations Fail to Initiate Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Neuron.

[9]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Dichoptic temporal frequency differences do not lead to binocular rivalry , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[11]  R. Blake A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[12]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[13]  D. Tolhurst Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of a moving visual stimulus , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Frank Tong,et al.  Competing Theories of Binocular Rivalry: A Possible Resolution , 2001 .

[15]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Enhanced temporal non-linearities in human object-related occipito-temporal cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel,et al.  Dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry share common perceptual dynamics. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[17]  P. C. DODWELL,et al.  A Theory of Binocular Fusion , 1963, Nature.

[18]  Casper J. Erkelens,et al.  Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms , 2005, Vision Research.

[19]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Object recognition can drive motion perception , 1998, Nature.

[20]  D. Snodderly,et al.  A Dissociation Between Brain Activity and Perception: Chromatically Opponent Cortical Neurons Signal Chromatic Flicker that is not Perceived , 1997, Vision Research.

[21]  R. Blake,et al.  What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision? , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Ke Zhou,et al.  Human visual cortex responds to invisible chromatic flicker , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  C. Clifford Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.

[24]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.5 The ‘when ’ pathway of the right parietal lobe , 2022 .

[25]  Georgios A. Keliris,et al.  A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain , 2005, Vision Research.

[26]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Time-locked Perceptual Fading Induced by Visual Transients , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Motion Perception , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2005, Nature.

[29]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation , 2001, Nature.

[30]  L. Stark,et al.  Most naturally occurring human saccades have magnitudes of 15 degrees or less. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[31]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Form constraints in motion binding , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  W. Levelt On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[33]  M T Turvey,et al.  Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance , 1979, Psychological research.

[34]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash , 1984, Vision Research.

[35]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Temporal Transfer Properties of the Afferent Visual System Psychophysical,Neurophysiological and Theoretical Investigations , 1973 .

[36]  Tutis Vilis,et al.  Segregation and persistence of form in the lateral occipital complex , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Form and motion have independent access to consciousness , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  P. Lennie,et al.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. , 1999, Science.

[39]  P. Wurtz,et al.  Size Matters: Saccades during Scene Perception , 2007, Perception.

[40]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Suppressing Where but Not What: , 2004, Psychological science.

[41]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  C. Gilbert Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  Randolph Blake,et al.  The role of temporal structure in human vision. , 2005, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[44]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[45]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[46]  R. Fox,et al.  Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Backward masking by pattern stimulus offset. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry , 2002, Vision Research.

[51]  Tutis Vilis,et al.  Perceptual continuity and the emergence of perceptual persistence in the ventral visual pathway. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  R. Blake,et al.  What is Suppressed during Binocular Rivalry? , 1980, Perception.

[53]  David Alais,et al.  Independent Binocular Rivalry Processes for Motion and Form , 2006, Neuron.

[54]  F. Fang,et al.  Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  Boris Crassini,et al.  Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  Wyeth Bair,et al.  Visual receptive field organization , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  Sheng He,et al.  Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry , 2000, Current Biology.

[58]  Zoe Kourtzi,et al.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of form analysis in the human visual cortex revealed by rapid event-related fMRI adaptation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[59]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[61]  R. Blake © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[62]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[63]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Spatial coding of position and orientation in primary visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[64]  W. Maguire,et al.  Spatial frequency and the mediation of short-term visual storage , 1977, Science.

[65]  R Fox,et al.  Effect of depth separation on metacontrast masking. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[66]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.