What Inquiry with Virtual Labs Can Learn from Productive Failure: A Theory-Driven Study of Students' Reflections

During inquiry learning with virtual labs students are invited to construct mathematical models that capture key features of the underlying structures. However, students typically fail to construct complete models. In order to identify ways to support learners without restricting them, we look at the literature of Productive Failure and Invention activities (often termed PS-I, Problem Solving before Instruction). PS-I activities are designed to facilitate specific cognitive mechanisms that aid learning. This paper seeks to (1) evaluate in what ways PS-I activities compare to inquiry learning, (2) whether students in inquiry learning report similar processes to PS-I, and (3) whether these are associated with better learning. We begin by synthesizing the two approaches in order to highlight their similarities. Following, we coded self-reported post-activity reflections by 139 students who worked with two virtual labs. Students reported processes that are typical to PS-I and, out of these, prior knowledge activation was associated with constructing more complete models. Based on this, we suggest ways to support students in learning from their inquiry.

[1]  D. Klahr,et al.  All other things being equal: acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. , 1999, Child development.

[2]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[3]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  The Design of an Exploratory Learning Environment to Support Invention , 2015, AIED Workshops.

[4]  Ido Roll,et al.  Towards a Theory of When and How Problem Solving Followed by Instruction Supports Learning , 2017 .

[5]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Knowledge acquisition as a constructive modeling activity , 1993, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[6]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Scientific Reasoning Across Different Domains , 1992 .

[7]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  The impact of guidance during problem-solving prior to instruction on students’ inventions and learning outcomes , 2014 .

[8]  Ido Roll,et al.  Evaluating metacognitive scaffolding in Guided Invention Activities , 2012 .

[9]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .

[10]  Ido Roll,et al.  Control of Variables Strategy Across Phases of Inquiry in Virtual Labs , 2018, AIED.

[11]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Inventing to Prepare for Future Learning: The Hidden Efficiency of Encouraging Original Student Production in Statistics Instruction , 2004 .

[12]  Ido Roll,et al.  Making the failure more productive: scaffolding the invention process to improve inquiry behaviors and outcomes in invention activities , 2014 .

[13]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Toward a theory of impasse-driven learning , 1988 .

[14]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Offering and discovering domain information in simulation-based inquiry learning , 2010 .

[15]  M. McHugh Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic , 2012, Biochemia medica.

[16]  I. Roll,et al.  DIY productive failure: boosting performance in a large undergraduate biology course , 2019, npj Science of Learning.

[17]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Designing for Productive Failure , 2012 .

[18]  Ellen T. Kamp,et al.  Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle , 2015 .

[19]  Donald Eugene. Farrar,et al.  Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis; the Problem Revisited , 2011 .

[20]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. , 2011 .