Perception and prediction of simple object interactions

For humans, it is useful to be able to visually detect an object's physical properties. One potentially important source of information is the way the object moves and interacts with other objects in the environment. Here, we use computer simulations of a virtual ball bouncing on a horizontal plane to study the correspondence between our ability to estimate the ball's elasticity and to predict its future path. Three experiments were conducted to address (1) perception of the ball's elasticity, (2) interaction with the ball, and (3) prediction of its trajectory. The results suggest that different strategies and information sources are used for passive perception versus actively predicting future behavior.

[1]  Geoffrey P Bingham,et al.  Causation, causal perception, and conservation laws , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  H. Hecht,et al.  Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  R. Ward Independence and integration of perception and action: An introduction , 2002 .

[4]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Heuristic judgment of mass ratio in two-body collisions , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Understanding natural dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  P. Juslin,et al.  Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. , 2000, Psychological review.

[7]  V. Franz,et al.  Action does not resist visual illusions , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Thanh Giang,et al.  Evaluating the visual fidelity of physically based animations , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[9]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[10]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Understanding collision dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Henrik Olsson,et al.  Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. , 2000, Psychological review.

[12]  R. C. Oldfield THE PERCEPTION OF CAUSALITY , 1963 .

[13]  John Dingliana,et al.  Collisions and perception , 2001, TOGS.

[14]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  W H Warren,et al.  The Way the Ball Bounces: Visual and Auditory Perception of Elasticity and Control of the Bounce Pass , 1987, Perception.

[17]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  Heuristics and invariants in dynamic event perception: Immunized concepts or nonstatements? , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.