Supercharging planetlab: a high performance, multi-application, overlay network platform

In recent years, overlay networks have become an important vehicle for delivering Internet applications. Overlay network nodes are typically implemented using general purpose servers or clusters. We investigate the performance benefits of more integrated architectures, combining general-purpose servers with high performance Network Processor (NP) subsystems. We focus on PlanetLab as our experimental context and report on the design and evaluation of an experimental PlanetLab platform capable of much higher levels of performance than typical system configurations. To make it easier for users to port applications, the system supports a fast path/slow path application structure that facilitates the mapping of the most performance-critical parts of an application onto an NP subsystem, while allowing the more complex control and exception-handling to be implemented within the programmer-friendly environment provided by conventional servers. We report on implementations of two sample applications, an IPv4 router, and a forwarding application for the Internet Indirection Infrastructure. We demonstrate an 80x improvement in packet processing rates and comparable reductions in latency.

[1]  David Mazières,et al.  Democratizing Content Publication with Coral , 2004, NSDI.

[2]  David E. Culler,et al.  PlanetLab: an overlay testbed for broad-coverage services , 2003, CCRV.

[3]  EDDIE KOHLER,et al.  The click modular router , 2000, TOCS.

[4]  Brighten Godfrey,et al.  OpenDHT: a public DHT service and its uses , 2005, SIGCOMM '05.

[5]  Yitzchak M. Gottlieb,et al.  Building a robust software-based router using network processors , 2001, SOSP.

[6]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  Colyseus: A Distributed Architecture for Online Multiplayer Games , 2006, NSDI.

[7]  Larry L. Peterson,et al.  VERA: an extensible router architecture , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[8]  Nick Feamster,et al.  In VINI veritas: realistic and controlled network experimentation , 2006, SIGCOMM 2006.

[9]  Jonathan S. Turner.  A proposed architecture for the GENI backbone platform , 2006, 2006 Symposium on Architecture For Networking And Communications Systems.

[10]  Robert Morris,et al.  Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications , 2001, SIGCOMM 2001.

[11]  Chip Elliott,et al.  GENI - global environment for network innovations , 2008, LCN.

[12]  Ramesh K. Sitaraman,et al.  A transport layer for live streaming in a content delivery network , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  Bruce M. Maggs,et al.  Globally Distributed Content Delivery , 2002, IEEE Internet Comput..

[14]  Prashanth Pappu,et al.  Distributed queueing in scalable high performance routers , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[15]  Carl A. Gunter,et al.  PLAN: a packet language for active networks , 1998, ICFP '98.

[16]  David R. Karger,et al.  Chord: a scalable peer-to-peer lookup protocol for internet applications , 2003, TNET.

[17]  David E. Culler,et al.  A blueprint for introducing disruptive technology into the Internet , 2003, CCRV.

[18]  Scott Shenker,et al.  Internet indirection infrastructure , 2004, TNET.