Development of an EMG-Controlled Knee Exoskeleton to Assist Home Rehabilitation in a Game Context

As a leading cause of loss of functional movement, stroke often makes it difficult for patients to walk. Interventions to aid motor recovery in stroke patients should be carried out as a matter of urgency. However, muscle activity in the knee is usually too weak to generate overt movements, which poses a challenge for early post-stroke rehabilitation training. Although electromyography (EMG)-controlled exoskeletons have the potential to solve this problem, most existing robotic devices in rehabilitation centers are expensive, technologically complex, and allow only low training intensity. To address these problems, we have developed an EMG-controlled knee exoskeleton for use at home to assist stroke patients in their rehabilitation. EMG signals of the subject are acquired by an easy-to-don EMG sensor and then processed by a Kalman filter to control the exoskeleton autonomously. A newly-designed game is introduced to improve rehabilitation by encouraging patients' involvement in the training process. Six healthy subjects took part in an initial test of this new training tool. The test showed that subjects could use their EMG signals to control the exoskeleton to assist them in playing the game. Subjects found the rehabilitation process interesting, and they improved their control performance through 20-block training, with game scores increasing from 41.3 ± 15.19 to 78.5 ± 25.2. The setup process was simplified compared to traditional studies and took only 72 s according to test on one healthy subject. The time lag of EMG signal processing, which is an important aspect for real-time control, was significantly reduced to about 64 ms by employing a Kalman filter, while the delay caused by the exoskeleton was about 110 ms. This easy-to-use rehabilitation tool has a greatly simplified training process and allows patients to undergo rehabilitation in a home environment without the need for a therapist to be present. It has the potential to improve the intensity of rehabilitation and the outcomes for stroke patients in the initial phase of rehabilitation.

[1]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[2]  Ashish D. Deshpande,et al.  Maestro: An EMG-driven assistive hand exoskeleton for spinal cord injury patients , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[3]  B. Johansson,et al.  Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity , 2011, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[4]  N. Ramsey,et al.  Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. , 2013, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[5]  Iris Hunger,et al.  IMPROVING TRANSPARENCY , 2011 .

[6]  Luis Gonzalez-Abril,et al.  Discrete classification technique applied to TV advertisements liking recognition system based on low-cost EEG headsets , 2016, Biomedical engineering online.

[7]  Rong Song,et al.  A Comparison Between Electromyography-Driven Robot and Passive Motion Device on Wrist Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[8]  F. Nouri,et al.  The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke. , 1989, International disability studies.

[9]  Luciano Luporini Menegaldo,et al.  Real-time muscle state estimation from EMG signals during isometric contractions using Kalman filters , 2017, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  Jeff Biernaskie,et al.  Enriched Rehabilitative Training Promotes Improved Forelimb Motor Function and Enhanced Dendritic Growth after Focal Ischemic Injury , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Mark Ferraro,et al.  Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint integrity following stroke , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[12]  Roger Gassert,et al.  The eWrist — A wearable wrist exoskeleton with sEMG-based force control for stroke rehabilitation , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[13]  Xue Zhang,et al.  Training wrist extensor function and detecting unwanted movement strategies in an EMG-controlled visuomotor task , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[14]  Jarrod A. Lewis-Peacock,et al.  Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  B. Johansson Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. The Willis lecture. , 2000, Stroke.

[16]  Rong Song,et al.  Movement Performance of Human–Robot Cooperation Control Based on EMG-Driven Hill-Type and Proportional Models for an Ankle Power-Assist Exoskeleton Robot , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Xing Chen,et al.  Improving the Transparency of an Exoskeleton Knee Joint Based on the Understanding of Motor Intent Using Energy Kernel Method of EMG , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  Marc F Norcross,et al.  Comparison of hamstring neuromechanical properties between healthy males and females and the influence of musculotendinous stiffness. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[19]  A. Hannan,et al.  Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Kemal S. Türker,et al.  Effect of gender, age, fatigue and contraction level on electromechanical delay , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  Shi Zhou,et al.  Electromechanical delay in isometric muscle contractions evoked by voluntary, reflex and electrical stimulation , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[22]  Xun Chen,et al.  Pattern recognition of number gestures based on a wireless surface EMG system , 2013, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[23]  S L Wolf,et al.  Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[24]  Antonio Frisoli,et al.  A Linear Optimization Procedure for an EMG-driven NeuroMusculoSkeletal Model Parameters Adjusting: Validation Through a Myoelectric Exoskeleton Control , 2016, EuroHaptics.

[25]  Jörg Krüger,et al.  Movement visualisation in virtual reality rehabilitation of the lower limb: a systematic review , 2016, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[26]  Dario Farina,et al.  Electromechanical delay in the tibialis anterior muscle during time-varying ankle dorsiflexion , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[27]  Nicola Vitiello,et al.  Intention-Based EMG Control for Powered Exoskeletons , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  J. Krakauer,et al.  The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain. , 2013, Current opinion in neurology.

[29]  O. Armagan,et al.  Electromyographic Biofeedback in the Treatment of the Hemiplegic Hand: A Placebo-Controlled Study , 2003, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[30]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation , 2011, The Lancet.

[31]  Robert Teasell,et al.  Rehabilitation of Individuals With Severe Stroke: Synthesis of Best Evidence and Challenges in Implementation , 2012, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[32]  B. Sañudo,et al.  Clinical Approaches of Whole-Body Vibration Exercises in Individuals with Stroke: A Narrative Revision , 2018, Rehabilitation research and practice.

[33]  Stefan Catheline,et al.  Electromechanical delay revisited using very high frame rate ultrasound. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[34]  Curtis A. Merring,et al.  An EMG-Driven Assistive Hand Exoskeleton for Spinal Cord Injury Patients : Maestro , 2017 .

[35]  Silvia Appendino,et al.  Design and testing of an under-actuated surface EMG-driven hand exoskeleton , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[36]  J. Millán,et al.  Increasing upper limb training intensity in chronic stroke using embodied virtual reality: a pilot study , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[37]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[38]  Yingmin Jia,et al.  Robust control with decoupling performance for steering and traction of 4WS vehicles under velocity-varying motion , 2000, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[39]  Martin Levesley,et al.  Home-based Computer Assisted Arm Rehabilitation (hCAAR) robotic device for upper limb exercise after stroke: results of a feasibility study in home setting , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[40]  P. Celnik,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation. , 2015, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[41]  A. Serino,et al.  Virtual Reality as a Vehicle to Empower Motor-Cognitive Neurorehabilitation , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[42]  Kartikeya Murari,et al.  Development of a multichannel current-EMG system for coherence modulation with visual biofeedback , 2018, PloS one.

[43]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Design of continuous EMG classification approaches towards the control of a robotic exoskeleton in reaching movements , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[44]  Zeng-Guang Hou,et al.  Experimental study of robot-assisted exercise training for knee rehabilitation based on a practical EMG-driven model , 2016, 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[45]  T. Olsen,et al.  The effect of a stroke unit: reductions in mortality, discharge rate to nursing home, length of hospital stay, and cost. A community-based study. , 1995, Stroke.

[46]  J. Cram,et al.  Effects of skin preparation on data collected using an EMG muscle-scanning procedure , 1989, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[47]  Rong Song,et al.  Using recurrent artificial neural network model to estimate voluntary elbow torque in dynamic situations , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[48]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Electromechanical delay in human skeletal muscle under concentric and eccentric contractions , 1979, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[49]  T. Murphy,et al.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[50]  Jing Chen,et al.  Effects of Home-based Telesupervising Rehabilitation on Physical Function for Stroke Survivors with Hemiplegia: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2017, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[51]  R. Savickas,et al.  Stroke Patients Motivation Influence on the Effectiveness of Occupational Therapy , 2018, Rehabilitation research and practice.

[52]  V. Feigin,et al.  Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[53]  Rainer Bader,et al.  The effect of continuous passive motion and sling exercise training on clinical and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized active-controlled clinical study , 2014, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[54]  Arto Visala,et al.  urrent state of digital signal processing in myoelectric interfaces and elated applications , 2015 .

[55]  Jun Morimoto,et al.  Adaptive Control of Exoskeleton Robots for Periodic Assistive Behaviours Based on EMG Feedback Minimisation , 2016, PloS one.

[56]  Sang Wook Lee,et al.  Subject-Specific Myoelectric Pattern Classification of Functional Hand Movements for Stroke Survivors , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[57]  D. Nozaki,et al.  Adaptation to Visual Feedback Delay Influences Visuomotor Learning , 2012, PloS one.