Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles addressing capacity fade

Abstract Lithium-ion batteries are currently used in electric vehicles (EVs) with many advantages; however, batteries contribute significantly to the life cycle environmental impacts of these vehicles. This article presents a comparative life cycle assessment of two types of batteries – lithium manganese oxide (LiMn2O4) and lithium ion phosphate (LiFePO4) – frequently used in EVs, addressing real-life operational conditions and battery capacity fade. The influence of the location of battery manufacturing and vehicle charging (electricity mix) was also assessed. A life cycle model of batteries in an EV with a service life of 200 000 km (functional unit) was implemented to assess Primary Fossil Energy, Global Warming, Acidification, and Eutrophication impacts. Moreover, the environmental performance of EVs considering both battery types was evaluated. The LiFePO4 battery had better operational performance than the LiMn2O4 one and fewer batteries were needed over the EV service life. Conversely, the life cycle impacts of the LiFePO4 batteries were higher than the LiMn2O4 ones mainly due to higher manufacturing impacts. In countries with a mix based on renewable electricity, the battery production is the most important contributor to impacts, while in countries with electricity mostly from fossil sources, the use phase is the most important. For both battery types and most impact categories, the environmental impacts of EVs were highly dependent on the usage scenario and the electricity mix used for charging.

[1]  Zhe Li,et al.  A dynamic capacity degradation model and its applications considering varying load for a large format Li-ion battery , 2016 .

[2]  M. Verbrugge,et al.  Degradation of lithium ion batteries employing graphite negatives and nickel-cobalt-manganese oxide + spinel manganese oxide positives: Part 1, aging mechanisms and life estimation , 2014 .

[3]  Bao-Jun Tang,et al.  The analysis of the battery electric vehicle’s potentiality of environmental effect: A case study of Beijing from 2016 to 2020 , 2017 .

[4]  S. Torai,et al.  State-of-health estimation of LiFePO4/graphite batteries based on a model using differential capacity , 2016 .

[5]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[6]  Jae Wan Park,et al.  Off-grid photovoltaic vehicle charge using second life lithium batteries: An experimental and numerical investigation , 2013 .

[7]  Alexander M. Bradshaw,et al.  Supply risks associated with lithium-ion battery materials , 2018 .

[8]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2 , 2010 .

[9]  Laisuo Su,et al.  Identifying main factors of capacity fading in lithium ion cells using orthogonal design of experiments , 2016 .

[10]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Co-estimation of state-of-charge, capacity and resistance for lithium-ion batteries based on a high-fidelity electrochemical model , 2016 .

[11]  Constantine Samaras,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  N. Omar,et al.  Lithium iron phosphate based battery: Assessment of the aging parameters and development of cycle life model , 2014 .

[13]  Xie Ying-hao,et al.  Present situation and prospect of lithium-ion traction batteries for electric vehicles domestic and overseas standards , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference and Expo Transportation Electrification Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific).

[14]  Xuning Feng,et al.  State-of-health monitoring of lithium-ion battery modules and packs via incremental capacity peak tracking , 2016 .

[15]  Dominique Millet,et al.  A novel approach for global environmental performance evaluation of electric batteries for hybrid vehicles , 2017 .

[16]  Peng Zhang,et al.  Fading Kalman filter-based real-time state of charge estimation in LiFePO4 battery-powered electric vehicles , 2016 .

[17]  Hongwen He,et al.  Online estimation of model parameters and state-of-charge of LiFePO4 batteries in electric vehicles , 2012 .

[18]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  Primary and secondary use of electric mobility batteries from a life cycle perspective , 2014 .

[19]  M. Zackrisson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles – Critical issues , 2010 .

[20]  Dominic A. Notter,et al.  Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles , 2013 .

[22]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2002 .

[23]  M. Verbrugge,et al.  Cycle-life model for graphite-LiFePO 4 cells , 2011 .

[24]  Amaia Iturrondobeitia,et al.  Second life of electric vehicle batteries: relation between materials degradation and environmental impact , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[25]  F. Freire,et al.  Electric vehicles in Portugal: An integrated energy, greenhouse gas and cost life-cycle analysis , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST).

[26]  Fachao Jiang,et al.  Durability comparison of four different types of high-power batteries in HEV and their degradation mechanism analysis , 2016 .

[27]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  SUBAT: An assessment of sustainable battery technology , 2006 .

[28]  J. Dewulf,et al.  Resource demand for the production of different cathode materials for lithium ion batteries , 2014 .

[29]  Richard Barney Carlson,et al.  The Measured Impact of Vehicle Mass on Road Load Forces and Energy Consumption for a BEV, HEV, and ICE Vehicle , 2013 .

[30]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electric mobility: answers and challenges—Zurich, April 6, 2011 , 2011 .

[31]  Binyu Xiong,et al.  Enhanced online model identification and state of charge estimation for lithium-ion battery with a FBCRLS based observer , 2016 .

[32]  Pedro Marques,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of electricity in Portugal , 2014 .