Materials science in the artificial intelligence age: high-throughput library generation, machine learning, and a pathway from correlations to the underpinning physics

The use of advanced data analytics and applications of statistical and machine learning approaches ('AI') to materials science is experiencing explosive growth recently. In this prospective, we review recent work focusing on generation and application of libraries from both experiment and theoretical tools, across length scales. The available library data both enables classical correlative machine learning, and also opens the pathway for exploration of underlying causative physical behaviors. We highlight the key advances facilitated by this approach, and illustrate how modeling, macroscopic experiments and atomic-scale imaging can be combined to dramatically accelerate understanding and development of new material systems via a statistical physics framework. These developments point towards a data driven future wherein knowledge can be aggregated and used collectively, accelerating the advancement of materials science.

[1]  Ondrej Dyck,et al.  Tracking atomic structure evolution during directed electron beam induced Si-atom motion in graphene via deep machine learning , 2018, Nanotechnology.

[2]  David W. Aha,et al.  DARPA's Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Program , 2019, AI Mag..

[3]  Krishna Rajan,et al.  New frontiers for the materials genome initiative , 2019, npj Computational Materials.

[4]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Deep neural networks for understanding noisy data applied to physical property extraction in scanning probe microscopy , 2019, npj Computational Materials.

[5]  Turab Lookman,et al.  Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design , 2019, npj Computational Materials.

[6]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Atomic Mechanisms for the Si Atom Dynamics in Graphene: Chemical Transformations at the Edge and in the Bulk , 2019, Advanced Functional Materials.

[7]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Learning from Imperfections: Predicting Structure and Thermodynamics from Atomic Imaging of Fluctuations. , 2019, ACS nano.

[8]  Chi Chen,et al.  Graph Networks as a Universal Machine Learning Framework for Molecules and Crystals , 2018, Chemistry of Materials.

[9]  Savitha Ramasamy,et al.  Fast and interpretable classification of small X-ray diffraction datasets using data augmentation and deep neural networks , 2018, npj Computational Materials.

[10]  Alexander V. Balatsky,et al.  Band Gap Prediction for Large Organic Crystal Structures with Machine Learning , 2018, Advanced Quantum Technologies.

[11]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Building and exploring libraries of atomic defects in graphene: Scanning transmission electron and scanning tunneling microscopy study , 2018, Science Advances.

[12]  R. Batra,et al.  Physically informed artificial neural networks for atomistic modeling of materials , 2018, Nature Communications.

[13]  Ondrej Dyck,et al.  Deep learning analysis of defect and phase evolution during electron beam-induced transformations in WS2 , 2018, npj Computational Materials.

[14]  Alexander V. Shapeev,et al.  Accelerating crystal structure prediction by machine-learning interatomic potentials with active learning , 2018, Physical Review B.

[15]  Patrick Huck,et al.  Active learning for accelerated design of layered materials , 2018, npj Computational Materials.

[16]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The Deep Learning Revolution , 2018 .

[17]  Ian Foster,et al.  Can machine learning identify the next high-temperature superconductor? Examining extrapolation performance for materials discovery , 2018 .

[18]  J Barthel,et al.  Dr. Probe: A software for high-resolution STEM image simulation. , 2018, Ultramicroscopy.

[19]  Kyle Chard,et al.  Matminer: An open source toolkit for materials data mining , 2018, Computational Materials Science.

[20]  Leroy Cronin,et al.  Networking chemical robots for reaction multitasking , 2018, Nature Communications.

[21]  Anand Chandrasekaran,et al.  Polymer Genome: A Data-Powered Polymer Informatics Platform for Property Predictions , 2018, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.

[22]  Daniel W. Davies,et al.  Machine learning for molecular and materials science , 2018, Nature.

[23]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  ChemOS: Orchestrating autonomous experimentation , 2018, Science Robotics.

[24]  T. Koski,et al.  Materials Informatics for Dark Matter Detection , 2018, physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters.

[25]  Jason R. Hattrick-Simpers,et al.  A simple constrained machine learning model for predicting high-pressure-hydrogen-compressor materials , 2018 .

[26]  Hugo Ceulemans,et al.  Large-scale comparison of machine learning methods for drug target prediction on ChEMBL , 2018, Chemical science.

[27]  E. Strychalski,et al.  Equilibrium free energies from non-equilibrium trajectories with relaxation fluctuation spectroscopy , 2018 .

[28]  Kamal Choudhary,et al.  Machine learning with force-field inspired descriptors for materials: fast screening and mapping energy landscape. , 2018, Physical review materials.

[29]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Reconstructing phase diagrams from local measurements via Gaussian processes: mapping the temperature-composition space to confidence , 2018, npj Computational Materials.

[30]  J. Grossman,et al.  Machine Learning Enabled Computational Screening of Inorganic Solid Electrolytes for Suppression of Dendrite Formation in Lithium Metal Anodes , 2018, ACS central science.

[31]  E. Reed,et al.  Elastic properties of bulk and low-dimensional materials using Van der Waals density functional. , 2018, Physical review. B.

[32]  Kamal Choudhary,et al.  High-throughput assessment of vacancy formation and surface energies of materials using classical force-fields , 2018, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[33]  Christopher Wolverton,et al.  Accelerated discovery of metallic glasses through iteration of machine learning and high-throughput experiments , 2018, Science Advances.

[34]  Geoffrey J. Gordon,et al.  Constant size descriptors for accurate machine learning models of molecular properties. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[35]  Xiaoning Qian,et al.  Autonomous efficient experiment design for materials discovery with Bayesian model averaging , 2018, Physical Review Materials.

[36]  Piotr Dittwald,et al.  Efficient Syntheses of Diverse, Medicinally Relevant Targets Planned by Computer and Executed in the Laboratory , 2018 .

[37]  Stephen Jesse,et al.  Machine learning–enabled identification of material phase transitions based on experimental data: Exploring collective dynamics in ferroelectric relaxors , 2018, Science Advances.

[38]  Turab Lookman,et al.  Multi-objective Optimization for Materials Discovery via Adaptive Design , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Ole Winther,et al.  A Deep Learning Approach to Identify Local Structures in Atomic‐Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy Images , 2018, Advanced Theory and Simulations.

[40]  T. Lookman,et al.  Accelerated Discovery of Large Electrostrains in BaTiO3‐Based Piezoelectrics Using Active Learning , 2018, Advanced materials.

[41]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Theoretical Impediments to Machine Learning With Seven Sparks from the Causal Revolution , 2018, WSDM.

[42]  K-R Müller,et al.  SchNet - A deep learning architecture for molecules and materials. , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[43]  E Weinan,et al.  DeePMD-kit: A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics , 2017, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[44]  David W Toth,et al.  The TensorMol-0.1 model chemistry: a neural network augmented with long-range physics , 2017, Chemical science.

[45]  Jeffrey C Grossman,et al.  Crystal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for an Accurate and Interpretable Prediction of Material Properties. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[46]  Corey Oses,et al.  Machine learning modeling of superconducting critical temperature , 2017, npj Computational Materials.

[47]  P. Schwaller,et al.  Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds , 2016, Nature Nanotechnology.

[48]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Automatic Chemical Design Using a Data-Driven Continuous Representation of Molecules , 2016, ACS central science.

[49]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Ultrafast current imaging by Bayesian inversion , 2018, Nature Communications.

[50]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Deep Learning of Atomically Resolved Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Images: Chemical Identification and Tracking Local Transformations. , 2017, ACS nano.

[51]  Erin Antono,et al.  Overcoming data scarcity with transfer learning , 2017, ArXiv.

[52]  Hao Wu,et al.  VAMPnets for deep learning of molecular kinetics , 2017, Nature Communications.

[53]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Consistent Integration of Experimental and Ab Initio Data into Effective Physical Models. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[54]  George E. Dahl,et al.  Prediction Errors of Molecular Machine Learning Models Lower than Hybrid DFT Error. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[55]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Knowledge Extraction from Atomically Resolved Images. , 2017, ACS nano.

[56]  Rampi Ramprasad,et al.  A universal strategy for the creation of machine learning-based atomistic force fields , 2017, npj Computational Materials.

[57]  Maxim Ziatdinov,et al.  Learning surface molecular structures via machine vision , 2017, npj Computational Materials.

[58]  Alok Choudhary,et al.  Including crystal structure attributes in machine learning models of formation energies via Voronoi tessellations , 2017 .

[59]  Kamal Choudhary,et al.  High-throughput Identification and Characterization of Two-dimensional Materials using Density functional theory , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[60]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  SchNet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions , 2017, NIPS.

[61]  Gerbrand Ceder,et al.  Efficient and accurate machine-learning interpolation of atomic energies in compositions with many species , 2017, 1706.06293.

[62]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Smart manufacturing must embrace big data , 2017, Nature.

[63]  Samuel S. Schoenholz,et al.  Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry , 2017, ICML.

[64]  Alexie M. Kolpak,et al.  Discovering charge density functionals and structure-property relationships with PROPhet: A general framework for coupling machine learning and first-principles methods , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[65]  Ichiro Takeuchi,et al.  Fulfilling the promise of the materials genome initiative with high-throughput experimental methodologies , 2017 .

[66]  Jie Yu,et al.  Solar fuels photoanode materials discovery by integrating high-throughput theory and experiment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Kamal Choudhary,et al.  Evaluation and comparison of classical interatomic potentials through a user-friendly interactive web-interface , 2017, Scientific Data.

[68]  Deri Sheppard,et al.  Robert Le Rossignol, 1884–1976: Engineer of the ‘Haber’ process , 2017, Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science.

[69]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields , 2016, Science Advances.

[70]  J S Smith,et al.  ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost , 2016, Chemical science.

[71]  Ronan Le Bras,et al.  Automated Phase Mapping with AgileFD and its Application to Light Absorber Discovery in the V-Mn-Nb Oxide System. , 2016, ACS combinatorial science.

[72]  Cormac Toher,et al.  Universal fragment descriptors for predicting properties of inorganic crystals , 2016, Nature Communications.

[73]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Rapid mapping of polarization switching through complete information acquisition , 2016, Nature Communications.

[74]  Rahul Rao,et al.  Autonomy in materials research: a case study in carbon nanotube growth , 2016 .

[75]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Chemical State Evolution in Ferroelectric Films during Tip-Induced Polarization and Electroresistive Switching. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[76]  Albert V. Davydov,et al.  Characterization of Few-Layer 1T' MoTe2 by Polarization-Resolved Second Harmonic Generation and Raman Scattering. , 2016, ACS nano.

[77]  Rampi Ramprasad,et al.  Machine Learning Force Fields: Construction, Validation, and Outlook , 2016, 1610.02098.

[78]  Taylor D. Sparks,et al.  High-Throughput Machine-Learning-Driven Synthesis of Full-Heusler Compounds , 2016 .

[79]  Wei Chen,et al.  A Statistical Learning Framework for Materials Science: Application to Elastic Moduli of k-nary Inorganic Polycrystalline Compounds , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[80]  Alireza Khorshidi,et al.  Amp: A modular approach to machine learning in atomistic simulations , 2016, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[81]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Full data acquisition in Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy: Mapping dynamic electric phenomena in real space , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[82]  Jianjun Hu,et al.  Semi-Supervised Approach to Phase Identification from Combinatorial Sample Diffraction Patterns , 2016 .

[83]  I. Foster,et al.  The Materials Data Facility: Data Services to Advance Materials Science Research , 2016, JOM.

[84]  Logan T. Ward,et al.  A General-Purpose Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Properties of Inorganic Materials , 2016, 1606.09551.

[85]  John M. Gregoire,et al.  Perspective: Composition–structure–property mapping in high-throughput experiments: Turning data into knowledge , 2016 .

[86]  Jae Hyung Park,et al.  Ultrafast Nanoimaging of the Photoinduced Phase Transition Dynamics in VO2. , 2016, Nano letters.

[87]  Chiho Kim,et al.  Finding New Perovskite Halides via Machine Learning , 2016, Front. Mater..

[88]  A. Choudhary,et al.  Perspective: Materials informatics and big data: Realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science , 2016 .

[89]  James Theiler,et al.  Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design , 2016, Nature Communications.

[90]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Quantification of surface displacements and electromechanical phenomena via dynamic atomic force microscopy , 2016, Nanotechnology.

[91]  Gus L. W. Hart,et al.  A computational high-throughput search for new ternary superalloys , 2016, 1603.05967.

[92]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[93]  Chiho Kim,et al.  A polymer dataset for accelerated property prediction and design , 2016, Scientific Data.

[94]  Arun Mannodi-Kanakkithodi,et al.  Machine Learning Strategy for Accelerated Design of Polymer Dielectrics , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[95]  Gerbrand Ceder,et al.  Interface Stability in Solid-State Batteries , 2016 .

[96]  M. Raschke,et al.  Ultrafast Nano-Imaging of the Photoinduced Phase Transition Dynamics in VO_2 , 2016 .

[97]  Christopher M Wolverton,et al.  High-throughput computational search for strengthening precipitates in alloys , 2016 .

[98]  Stephen Jesse,et al.  Full information acquisition in piezoresponse force microscopy , 2015 .

[99]  Muratahan Aykol,et al.  The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies , 2015 .

[100]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Local Phase Transitions Induced by Laser Heating. , 2015, ACS nano.

[101]  Edward O. Pyzer-Knapp,et al.  Learning from the Harvard Clean Energy Project: The Use of Neural Networks to Accelerate Materials Discovery , 2015 .

[102]  I Takeuchi,et al.  High-throughput determination of structural phase diagram and constituent phases using GRENDEL , 2015, Nanotechnology.

[103]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Big-deep-smart data in imaging for guiding materials design. , 2015, Nature materials.

[104]  Stephen Jesse,et al.  Identification of phases, symmetries and defects through local crystallography , 2015, Nature Communications.

[105]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Artificial intelligence. Fears of an AI pioneer. , 2015, Science.

[106]  Surya R. Kalidindi,et al.  Materials Data Science: Current Status and Future Outlook , 2015 .

[107]  Roger Proksch,et al.  Quantitative measurements of electromechanical response with a combined optical beam and interferometric atomic force microscope , 2015 .

[108]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[109]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Generalized machine learning technique for automatic phase attribution in time variant high-throughput experimental studies , 2015 .

[110]  Boris Kozinsky,et al.  AiiDA: Automated Interactive Infrastructure and Database for Computational Science , 2015, ArXiv.

[111]  Felix A Faber,et al.  Crystal structure representations for machine learning models of formation energies , 2015, 1503.07406.

[112]  S. Lany,et al.  Non-equilibrium alloying controls optoelectronic properties in Cu2O thin films for photovoltaic absorber applications , 2015 .

[113]  Gábor Csányi,et al.  Gaussian approximation potentials: A brief tutorial introduction , 2015, 1502.01366.

[114]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[115]  Christian Trott,et al.  Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[116]  Corey Oses,et al.  Materials Cartography: Representing and Mining Material Space Using Structural and Electronic Fingerprints , 2014, 1412.4096.

[117]  Ghanshyam Pilania,et al.  Rational design of all organic polymer dielectrics , 2014, Nature Communications.

[118]  Manh Cuong Nguyen,et al.  On-the-fly machine-learning for high-throughput experiments: search for rare-earth-free permanent magnets , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[119]  Shyue Ping Ong,et al.  Insights into Diffusion Mechanisms in P2 Layered Oxide Materials by First-Principles Calculations , 2014 .

[120]  Pavlo O. Dral,et al.  Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules , 2014, Scientific Data.

[121]  J. Pablo,et al.  The Materials Genome Initiative, the interplay of experiment, theory and computation , 2014 .

[122]  Kristof T. Schütt,et al.  How to represent crystal structures for machine learning: Towards fast prediction of electronic properties , 2013, 1307.1266.

[123]  Milica Todorović,et al.  Understanding scanning tunneling microscopy contrast mechanisms on metal oxides: a case study. , 2013, ACS nano.

[124]  Stephen Jesse,et al.  Correlative Multimodal Probing of Ionically-Mediated Electromechanical Phenomena in Simple Oxides , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[125]  Kristin A. Persson,et al.  Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation , 2013 .

[126]  Ichiro Takeuchi,et al.  Applications of high throughput (combinatorial) methodologies to electronic, magnetic, optical, and energy-related materials , 2013 .

[127]  R. Kondor,et al.  On representing chemical environments , 2012, 1209.3140.

[128]  Martin Lilleeng Sætra,et al.  Graphics processing unit (GPU) programming strategies and trends in GPU computing , 2013, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[129]  David T. Fullwood,et al.  Microstructure Sensitive Design for Performance Optimization , 2012 .

[130]  Marco Buongiorno Nardelli,et al.  AFLOWLIB.ORG: A distributed materials properties repository from high-throughput ab initio calculations , 2012 .

[131]  R. Proksch,et al.  Quantitative Viscoelastic Mapping of Polyolefin Blends with Contact Resonance Atomic Force Microscopy , 2012 .

[132]  K. Müller,et al.  Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[133]  C. M. Folkman,et al.  X-ray nanodiffraction of tilted domains in a poled epitaxial BiFeO3 thin film , 2011 .

[134]  Ronan Le Bras,et al.  Constraint Reasoning and Kernel Clustering for Pattern Decomposition with Scaling , 2011, CP.

[135]  Surya R. Kalidindi,et al.  Microstructure informatics using higher-order statistics and efficient data-mining protocols , 2011 .

[136]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[137]  Darren Dale,et al.  A wavelet transform algorithm for peak detection and application to powder x-ray diffraction data. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.

[138]  Anubhav Jain,et al.  Finding Nature’s Missing Ternary Oxide Compounds Using Machine Learning and Density Functional Theory , 2010 .

[139]  S Jesse,et al.  Disorder identification in hysteresis data: recognition analysis of the random-bond-random-field Ising model. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[140]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Functional recognition imaging using artificial neural networks: applications to rapid cellular identification via broadband electromechanical response , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[141]  I Takeuchi,et al.  Rapid identification of structural phases in combinatorial thin-film libraries using x-ray diffraction and non-negative matrix factorization. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[142]  Maria Liakata,et al.  The Robot Scientist Adam , 2009, Computer.

[143]  D. Sholl,et al.  Density Functional Theory: A Practical Introduction , 2009 .

[144]  Byoungwoo Kang,et al.  Battery materials for ultrafast charging and discharging , 2009, Nature.

[145]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Spatially Resolved Mapping of Local Polarization Dynamics in an Ergodic Phase of Ferroelectric Relaxor , 2008, 0808.3827.

[146]  M. Blamire,et al.  High throughput thin film materials science , 2008 .

[147]  Roger L. King,et al.  An Efficient Pan-Sharpening Method via a Combined Adaptive PCA Approach and Contourlets , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[148]  D. Fullwood,et al.  Microstructure reconstructions from 2-point statistics using phase-recovery algorithms , 2008 .

[149]  Christian J. Long,et al.  Data Analysis in Combinatorial Experiments: Applying Supervised Principal Component Technique to Investigate the Relationship Between ToF-SIMS Spectra and the Composition Distribution of Ternary Metallic Alloy Thin Films , 2008 .

[150]  W. Maier,et al.  Combinatorial and high-throughput materials science. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[151]  I. Takeuchi,et al.  Rapid structural mapping of ternary metallic alloy systems using the combinatorial approach and cluster analysis. , 2007, The Review of scientific instruments.

[152]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Electromechanical detection in scanning probe microscopy: Tip models and materials contrast , 2006, cond-mat/0607543.

[153]  John McCarthy,et al.  A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955 , 2006, AI Mag..

[154]  Ichiro Takeuchi,et al.  Combinatorial Experimentation and Materials Informatics , 2006 .

[155]  Yusuke Yamada,et al.  Utilization of Combinatorial Method and High Throughput Experimentation for Development of Heterogeneous Catalysts , 2006 .

[156]  J. Petzelt,et al.  The giant electromechanical response in ferroelectric relaxors as a critical phenomenon , 2006, Nature.

[157]  P. Hustad,et al.  Catalytic Production of Olefin Block Copolymers via Chain Shuttling Polymerization , 2006, Science.

[158]  M. Wuttig,et al.  Combinatorial search of thermoelastic shape-memory alloys with extremely small hysteresis width , 2006, Nature materials.

[159]  Christian J. Long,et al.  Data management and visualization of x-ray diffraction spectra from thin film ternary composition spreads , 2005 .

[160]  Tsuyoshi Ohnishi,et al.  Elements of informatics for combinatorial solid-state materials science , 2004 .

[161]  Sergei V. Kalinin,et al.  Nanoelectromechanics of piezoresponse force microscopy , 2004, cond-mat/0408223.

[162]  Kohji Omata,et al.  Optimization of Cu oxide catalysts for methanol synthesis by combinatorial tools using 96 well microplates, artificial neural network and genetic algorithm , 2004 .

[163]  M. Baerns,et al.  Application of a genetic algorithm and a neural network for the discovery and optimization of new solid catalytic materials , 2004 .

[164]  E. Smotkin,et al.  New Electrocatalysts by Combinatorial Methods , 2003 .

[165]  Sebastian Schlücker,et al.  Raman microspectroscopy: a comparison of point, line, and wide-field imaging methodologies. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[166]  Kristin A. Persson,et al.  Predicting crystal structures with data mining of quantum calculations. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[167]  B. Lai,et al.  An X-ray diffraction microscope at the Advanced Photon Source , 2003 .

[168]  Hideomi Koinuma,et al.  Combinatorial materials research projects in Japan , 2002 .

[169]  Rajiv K. Kalia,et al.  Hybrid finite-element/molecular-dynamics/electronic-density-functional approach to materials simulations on parallel computers , 2001 .

[170]  April S. Brown,et al.  Using neural networks to construct models of the molecular beam epitaxy process , 2000 .

[171]  Noël Bonnet,et al.  Artificial intelligence and pattern recognition techniques in microscope image processing and analysis , 2000 .

[172]  Abdelhak Bensaoula,et al.  The use of multilayer neural networks in material synthesis , 1998 .

[173]  Peter G. Schultz,et al.  A Combinatorial Approach to Materials Discovery , 1995, Science.

[174]  Bobby G. Sumpter,et al.  Neural Network-Graph Theory Approach to the Prediction of the Physical Properties of Organic Compounds , 1994, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[175]  Kenneth R. Currie,et al.  Self-improving process control for molecular beam epitaxy , 1993 .

[176]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[177]  Bobby G. Sumpter,et al.  Neural network predictions of energy transfer in macromolecules , 1992 .

[178]  F. Allen,et al.  The crystallographic information file (CIF) : a new standard archive file for crystallography , 1991 .

[179]  J. Banavar,et al.  Computer Simulation of Liquids , 1988 .

[180]  Yann LeCun,et al.  A theoretical framework for back-propagation , 1988 .

[181]  J. Hanak.  The “multiple-sample concept” in materials research: Synthesis, compositional analysis and testing of entire multicomponent systems , 1970 .

[182]  R C A Laboratories,et al.  The "Multiple-Sample Concept" in Materials Research: Synthesis, Compositional Analysis and Testing of Entire Multicomponent Systems , 1970 .