Control of a Space Manipulator Capturing a Rotating Object in the Three-dimensional Space

For space robots accomplishing the overwhelming majority of on-orbit servicing(OOS) missions, capture of a target object is the primary task. Capture of a rotating object in orbit is an especially important and challenging task for OOS such as orbital debris removal. This paper studies the control strategy for capturing a fast rotating object by a space manipulator from a floating spacecraft in the three-dimensional space. First, in order to simulate the real contact condition as much as possible, a contact dynamics model considering the effect of the contact geometry of the capture interfaces is built. Second, the control strategy is proposed by a combination of a resolved motion rate control method and hybrid impedance control technique. The stability is proved by Lyapunov theorem. Finally, a simulation example of a 7-joint manipulator capturing a rotating target object in the unrestricted three-dimensional space is conducted to verify the feasibility and efficiency of the control strategy. In the effect of the control law, relative velocity at the contact spots is reduced, and thus the target object at an initial rotation speed of 12 deg/s (2 rpm) is captured successfully.

[1]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[2]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Resolved Motion Rate Control of Manipulators and Human Prostheses , 1969 .

[3]  Dan Koditschek,et al.  Natural motion for robot arms , 1984, The 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  S. Ali A. Moosavian,et al.  Multiple Impedance Control for Space Free-Flying Robots , 2005 .

[5]  Angel Flores-Abad,et al.  Optimal Control of a Space Robot to Approach a Tumbling Object for Capture with Uncertainties in the Boundary Conditions , 2013 .

[6]  Richard P. Paul,et al.  Problems and research issues associated with the hybrid control of force and displacement , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Inna Sharf,et al.  Literature survey of contact dynamics modelling , 2002 .

[8]  Meyer Nahon,et al.  Development and Validation of Geometry-Based Compliant Contact Models , 2009 .

[9]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Hybrid impedance control of robotic manipulators , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[10]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[11]  Kenji Nagaoka,et al.  Impedance-based contact control of a free-flying space robot with respect to coefficient of restitution , 2011, 2011 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII).

[12]  Weiping Li,et al.  Adaptive strategies in constrained manipulation , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Coefficient of Restitution Interpreted as Damping in Vibroimpact , 1975 .

[14]  John J. Craig Zhu,et al.  Introduction to robotics mechanics and control , 1991 .

[15]  Ou Ma,et al.  An extended bristle friction force model with experimental validation , 2012 .

[16]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Dynamics, control and impedance matching for robotic capture of a non-cooperative satellite , 2004, Adv. Robotics.