Hand to mouth: automatic imitation across effector systems.

The effector dependence of automatic imitation was investigated using a stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) procedure during which participants were required to make an open or closed response with their hand or their mouth. The correct response for each trial was indicated by a pair of letters in Experiments 1 and 2 and by a colored square in Experiment 3. Each of these imperative stimuli was accompanied by task-irrelevant action images depicting a hand or mouth opening or closing. In relation to the response, the irrelevant stimulus was movement compatible or movement incompatible, and effector compatible or effector incompatible. A movement compatibility effect was observed for both hand and mouth responses. These movement compatibility effects were present when the irrelevant stimulus was effector compatible and when it was effector incompatible, but were smaller when the irrelevant stimulus and response effectors were incompatible. Consistent with the associative sequence learning (ASL) model of imitation, these findings indicate that automatic imitation is partially effector dependent and therefore that the effector dependence of intentional imitation reflects, at least in part, the nature of the mechanisms that mediate visuomotor translation for imitation.

[1]  C. Heyes Where do mirror neurons come from? , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Through the looking glass: counter‐mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learning , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[3]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Experience-based priming of body parts: A study of action imitation , 2008, Brain Research.

[4]  C. Heyes,et al.  Automatic imitation of intransitive actions , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  C. Heyes,et al.  General processes, rather than "goals," explain imitation errors. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Sensorimotor Learning Configures the Human Mirror System , 2007, Current Biology.

[7]  James Stanley,et al.  Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  E. Franz,et al.  Brain and cognitive processes of imitation in bimanual situations: Making inferences about mirror neuron systems , 2007, Brain Research.

[9]  S. Tipper,et al.  Implicit action encoding influences personal-trait judgments , 2007, Cognition.

[10]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Bottom‐up, not top‐down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  Matthew R Longo,et al.  Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Susan S. Jones,et al.  Exploration or imitation? The effect of music on 4-week-old infants' tongue protrusions. , 2006, Infant behavior & development.

[14]  C. Heyes,et al.  Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  M. Brass,et al.  Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  C. Heyes,et al.  Experience modulates automatic imitation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  Leonardo Fogassi,et al.  Mirror Neurons Responding to Observation of Actions Made with Tools in Monkey Ventral Premotor Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Imitation by association , 2005 .

[20]  S Hurley,et al.  Perspectives on Imitation , 2004 .

[21]  D. Perrett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.11 November 2004 Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective , 2022 .

[22]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Spatial S-R compatibility effects in an intentional imitation task , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Aina Puce,et al.  Viewing the motion of human body parts activates different regions of premotor, temporal, and parietal cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[24]  B. Hommel,et al.  Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning , 2004, Psychological research.

[25]  A. Whiten,et al.  How do apes ape? , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[26]  T. Paus,et al.  Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Audiovisual mirror neurons and action recognition , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Using Nonconscious Behavioral Mimicry to Create Affiliation and Rapport , 2003, Psychological science.

[29]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[30]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[31]  W. Prinz Experimental approaches to imitation , 2002 .

[32]  W. Prinz,et al.  The imitative mind : development, evolution, and brain bases , 2002 .

[33]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[34]  C. Heyes Causes and consequences of imitation , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  Lateralization in motor facilitation during action observation: a TMS study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[36]  A Puce,et al.  Human neural responses elicited to observing the actions of others , 2001, Visual Neuroscience.

[37]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  B. Hommel,et al.  Effect anticipation and action control. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Visuomotor Priming , 2001 .

[40]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[42]  T. Paus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability during action observation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[43]  H Bekkering,et al.  Motor activation from visible speech: evidence from stimulus response compatibility. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  C. Heyes,et al.  What Is the Significance of Imitation in Animals , 2000 .

[45]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[46]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  E. Ullstadius Neonatal imitation in a mother infant setting , 1998 .

[48]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Explaining Facial Imitation: A Theoretical Model. , 1997, Early development & parenting.

[49]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[50]  W. Prinz,et al.  Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[51]  B. Hommel Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility , 1997 .

[52]  S. S. Jones,et al.  Imitation or exploration? Young infants' matching of adults' oral gestures. , 1996, Child development.

[53]  M. Anisfeld,et al.  Only Tongue Protrusion Modeling Is Matched by Neonates , 1996 .

[54]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[56]  M. Tomasello CHAPTER 15 – Do Apes Ape? , 1996 .

[57]  C. Heyes,et al.  Social learning in animals : the roots of culture , 1996 .

[58]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. , 1995 .

[59]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  J. Pearce Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model. , 1994, Psychological review.

[62]  S Kornblum,et al.  The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli , 1994, Psychological research.

[63]  B. Hommel The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap , 1993 .

[64]  S. Kornblum Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. , 1992 .

[65]  M. Anisfeld Neonatal imitation*1 , 1991 .

[66]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[67]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Imitation in Newborn Infants: Exploring the Range of Gestures Imitated and the Underlying Mechanisms. , 1989, Developmental psychology.

[68]  J. Pearce A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. , 1987, Psychological review.

[69]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. , 1983, Child development.

[70]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates , 1977, Science.

[71]  S. M. Berger,et al.  Some effects of a model's performance on an observer's electromyographic activity. , 1975, American Journal of Psychology.

[72]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[73]  S. Wapner,et al.  Imitation of a model's hand movements: age changes in transposition of left-right relations. , 1968, Child development.

[74]  H. Head Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech , 1926 .

[75]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.