Aligning the Goals of Learning Analytics with its Research Scholarship: An Open Peer Commentary Approach
暂无分享,去创建一个
Veronica X. Yan | René F. Kizilcec | Matthieu J. S. Brinkhuis | Catherine A. Manly | Rebecca L. Matz | Anouschka van Leeuwen | S. Buckingham Shum | H. Drachsler | Yi-Shan Tsai | M. Meaney | Rebecca Ferguson | X. Ochoa | J. Lodge | Joshua Weidlich | Kirsty Kitto | K. Williamson | Hassan Khosravi | Olga Viberg | I. Jivet | Marco Spruit | Brendan A. Schuetze | Caitlin Hayward | A. Aggarwal | Max van Haastrecht | Bentley G. Hicks | Vitomir Kovanovíc | Lujie Karen Chen | Valerie A. Guerrero | Michael Hanses | Lars Van Rijn | V. Kovanović | L. Chen | René F. Kizilcec
[1] Oscar Blessed Deho,et al. Should Learning Analytics Models Include Sensitive Attributes? Explaining the Why , 2023, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[2] J. Lodge,et al. Mapping out a research agenda for generative artificial intelligence in tertiary education , 2023, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.
[3] René F. Kizilcec,et al. From pipelines to pathways in the study of academic progress , 2023, Science.
[4] S. Buckingham Shum,et al. Using causal models to bridge the divide between big data and educational theory , 2023, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[5] Matthieu J. S. Brinkhuis,et al. Embracing Trustworthiness and Authenticity in the Validation of Learning Analytics Systems , 2023, LAK.
[6] T. Fikes,et al. The Promise of MOOCs Revisited? Demographics of Learners Preparing for University , 2023, J. Learn. Anal..
[7] Amina Adadi,et al. Recent advances in Predictive Learning Analytics: A decade systematic review (2012–2022) , 2022, Education and Information Technologies.
[8] D. Gašević,et al. Causal Inference and Bias in Learning Analytics: A Primer on Pitfalls Using Directed Acyclic Graphs , 2022, J. Learn. Anal..
[9] M. Khalil,et al. The use and application of learning theory in learning analytics: a scoping review , 2022, Journal of Computing in Higher Education.
[10] René F. Kizilcec,et al. Large-Scale Student Data Reveal Sociodemographic Gaps in Procrastination Behavior , 2022, L@S.
[11] Renée S. Jansen,et al. Exploring the link between self-regulated learning and learner behaviour in a massive open online course , 2022, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[12] S. B. Shum,et al. Thinking with causal models: A visual formalism for collaboratively crafting assumptions , 2022, LAK.
[13] René F. Kizilcec,et al. A Review of Learning Analytics Dashboard Research in Higher Education: Implications for Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion , 2022, LAK.
[14] Mohamad Kazem Shirani Faradonbeh,et al. A novel video recommendation system for algebra: An effectiveness evaluation study , 2022, LAK.
[15] A. Wise,et al. Unpacking Instructors’ Analytics Use: Two Distinct Profiles for Informing Teaching , 2022, LAK.
[16] A. Mousavi,et al. A scoping review of empirical studies on theory-driven learning analytics , 2022, Distance Education.
[17] A. Wise,et al. What Makes Learning Analytics Research Matter , 2021, J. Learn. Anal..
[18] Veronica X. Yan,et al. Not Just Stimuli Structure: Sequencing Effects in Category Learning Vary by Task Demands , 2021, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
[19] Tim Kühl,et al. Prerequisite knowledge and time of testing in learning with animations and static pictures: Evidence for the expertise reversal effect , 2021 .
[20] Rachel Dickler,et al. Using Innovative Methods to Explore the Potential of an Alerting Dashboard for Science Inquiry , 2021, J. Learn. Anal..
[21] Stephanie D. Teasley,et al. Measuring Students’ Self-Regulatory Phases in LMS with Behavior and Real-Time Self Report , 2021, LAK.
[22] Vincent Aleven,et al. A General Multi-method Approach to Data-Driven Redesign of Tutoring Systems , 2021, LAK.
[23] Alyssa Friend Wise,et al. Subversive Learning Analytics , 2021, LAK.
[24] Nora'ayu Ahmad Uzir,et al. Impact of learning analytics feedback on self-regulated learning: Triangulating behavioural logs with students’ recall , 2021, LAK.
[25] Nigel Bosch,et al. A Social Network Analysis of Online Engagement for College Students Traditionally Underrepresented in STEM , 2021, LAK.
[26] A. Evrard,et al. How Did You Get that A? Selectivity’s Role in Rising Undergraduate Grades at a Large Public University , 2021, LAK.
[27] Elizabeth Hanley,et al. Analyzing the Efficacy of ECoach in Supporting Gateway Course Success Through Tailored Support , 2021, LAK.
[28] P. Meier. Solar , 2020, The Changing Energy Mix.
[29] Jaclyn L. Ocumpaugh,et al. Who's Learning? Using Demographics in EDM Research , 2020 .
[30] Dragan Gasevic,et al. A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies on Learning Analytics Dashboards: A Self-Regulated Learning Perspective , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[31] Korah J. Wiley,et al. From theory to action: developing and evaluating learning analytics for learning design , 2020 .
[32] Jelena Jovanovic,et al. Intergroup and interpersonal forum positioning in shared-thread and post-reply networks , 2020, LAK.
[33] Beata Beigman Klebanov,et al. Detecting learning in noisy data: the case of oral reading fluency , 2020, LAK.
[34] Abelardo Pardo,et al. Combining analytic methods to unlock sequential and temporal patterns of self-regulated learning , 2020, LAK.
[35] Ryan S. Baker,et al. Personalized visualizations to promote young learners' SRL: the learning path app , 2020, LAK.
[36] Dragan Gasevic,et al. Bridging learning sciences, machine learning and affective computing for understanding cognition and affect in collaborative learning , 2020, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[37] Anouschka van Leeuwen,et al. Supporting learners' self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses , 2020, Comput. Educ..
[38] Alfred Essa,et al. Is Data Dark? Lessons from Borges's "Funes the Memorius" , 2019, J. Learn. Anal..
[39] John T. E. Richardson,et al. Learning analytics to uncover inequality in behavioural engagement and academic attainment in a distance learning setting , 2019, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
[40] C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al. Ten years of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005–2014 , 2019, Educational Research Review.
[41] Brett E. Shelton,et al. A systematic meta-Review and analysis of learning analytics research , 2019, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[42] Ryan S. Baker,et al. Challenges for the Future of Educational Data Mining: The Baker Learning Analytics Prizes , 2019 .
[43] Christopher Brooks,et al. Modeling gender dynamics in intra and interpersonal interactions during online collaborative learning , 2019, LAK.
[44] Stephen J. Aguilar,et al. Motivated Information Seeking and Graph Comprehension Among College Students , 2019, LAK.
[45] George Siemens,et al. Increasing the Impact of Learning Analytics , 2019, LAK.
[46] M. I. Kaiser. Normativity in the Philosophy of Science , 2019, Metaphilosophy.
[47] Olga Viberg,et al. The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[48] Nicolae Nistor,et al. What types of data are used in learning analytics? An overview of six cases , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[49] Hassan Khosravi,et al. Topic Dependency Models: Graph-Based Visual Analytics for Communicating Assessment Data , 2018, J. Learn. Anal..
[50] Anders Larrabee Sønderlund,et al. The efficacy of learning analytics interventions in higher education: A systematic review , 2018, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[51] Abe D. Hofman,et al. Learning As It Happens: A Decade of Analyzing and Shaping a Large-Scale Online Learning System , 2018, J. Learn. Anal..
[52] F. Fischer,et al. Introduction : Evolution of Research in the Learning Sciences , 2018 .
[53] R. Wegerif. New Technology and the Apparent Failure of Democracy: An Educational Response , 2018, On Education. Journal for Research and Debate.
[54] I. Engeness,et al. The Complexity of Learning: Exploring the Interplay of Different Mediational Means in Group Learning with Digital Tools , 2017 .
[55] Katrien Verbert,et al. Review of Research on Student-Facing Learning Analytics Dashboards and Educational Recommender Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[56] Paul Prinsloo,et al. An elephant in the learning analytics room: the obligation to act , 2017, LAK.
[57] Mohamed Ez-zaouia,et al. EMODA: a tutor oriented multimodal and contextual emotional dashboard , 2017, LAK.
[58] Neil T. Heffernan,et al. Using correlational topic modeling for automated topic identification in intelligent tutoring systems , 2017, LAK.
[59] Rebecca Ferguson,et al. Research Evidence on the Use of Learning Analytics: Implications for Education Policy , 2016 .
[60] Paul J. Blayney,et al. The impact of complexity on the expertise reversal effect: experimental evidence from testing accounting students , 2016 .
[61] Britte Haugan Cheng,et al. Practical Measurement and Productive Persistence: Strategies for Using Digital Learning System Data to Drive Improvement , 2016, J. Learn. Anal..
[62] A. Barron,et al. Embracing multiple definitions of learning , 2015, Trends in Neurosciences.
[63] George Siemens,et al. Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education , 2014 .
[64] Jennifer L. Jennings,et al. “Teaching to the Test” in the NCLB Era , 2014 .
[65] Karen Littleton,et al. Epistemology, Assessment, Pedagogy: Where Learning Meets Analytics in the Middle Space , 2014, J. Learn. Anal..
[66] W. Penuel,et al. Design-Based Implementation Research: An Emerging Model for Transforming the Relationship of Research and Practice , 2013 .
[67] D. Clow. An overview of learning analytics , 2013 .
[68] C. Herrero,et al. From Access to Education , 2013 .
[69] Kirsten Berthold,et al. The expertise reversal effect in prompting focused processing of instructional explanations , 2013 .
[70] R. Wegerif. Dialogic: Education for the Internet Age , 2013 .
[71] Hendrik Drachsler,et al. Translating Learning into Numbers: A Generic Framework for Learning Analytics , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[72] Doug Clow,et al. The learning analytics cycle: closing the loop effectively , 2012, LAK.
[73] Gestion des affaires. Creative Commons License , 2012 .
[74] Olaf Zawacki-Richter. Research Areas in Distance Education: A Delphi Study , 2009 .
[75] Walter Kintsch,et al. Rereading Effects Depend on Time of Test. , 2005 .
[76] P. Julien,et al. Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship , 2001 .
[77] J. Worrall. Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?* , 1989 .
[78] L. Cronbach. Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. , 1975 .
[79] Susy Macqueen,et al. Validity , 1973, Just Algorithms.
[80] Joshua Quick,et al. Chapter 20: An Introduction to Fairness, Absence of Bias, and Equity in Learning Analytics , 2022 .
[81] P. Victer Paul,et al. A Survey on Predictive Models of Learning Analytics , 2020 .
[82] Lisa K. Fazio,et al. The Optimal Learning Strategy Depends on Learning Goals and Processes: Retrieval Practice Versus Worked Examples , 2019, Journal of Educational Psychology.
[83] Simon Buckingham Shum,et al. Transitioning education’s knowledge infrastructure: Shaping design or shouting from the touchline? , 2018 .
[84] S. L. Danver. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Online Education , 2016 .
[85] George Siemens,et al. Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning , 2015 .
[86] Sylvia Hurtado,et al. A Model for Diverse Learning Environments The Scholarship on Creating and Assessing Conditions for Student Success , 2015 .
[87] J. Earle,et al. Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development , 2013 .
[88] Sylvia Hurtado,et al. A Model for Diverse Learning Environments , 2012 .
[89] A. Kravtsova,et al. UNESCO INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN EDUCATION , 1904 .