A complete algorithm to resolve ambiguity for intersubunit NOE assignment in structure determination of symmetric homo‐oligomers

Assignment of nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) data is a key bottleneck in structure determination by NMR. NOE assignment resolves the ambiguity as to which pair of protons generated the observed NOE peaks, and thus should be restrained in structure determination. In the case of intersubunit NOEs in symmetric homo‐oligomers, the ambiguity includes both the identities of the protons within a subunit, and the identities of the subunits to which they belong. This paper develops an algorithm for simultanous intersubunit NOE assignment and Cn symmetric homo‐oligomeric structure determinations, given the subunit structure. By using a configuration space framework, our algorithm guarantees completeness, in that it identifies structures representing, to within a user‐defined similarity level, every structure consistent with the available data (ambiguous or not). However, while our approach is complete in considering all conformations and assignments, it avoids explicit enumeration of the exponential number of combinations of possible assignments. Our algorithm can draw two types of conclusions not possible under previous methods: (1) that different assignments for an NOE would lead to different structural classes, or (2) that it is not necessary to uniquely assign an NOE, since it would have little impact on structural precision. We demonstrate on two test proteins that our method reduces the average number of possible assignments per NOE by a factor of 2.6 for MinE and 4.2 for CCMP. It results in high structural precision, reducing the average variance in atomic positions by factors of 1.5 and 3.6, respectively.

[1]  A. Yee,et al.  Solution structure of the Escherichia coli protein ydhR: A putative mono‐oxygenase , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  B. Donald,et al.  Structure determination of symmetric homo‐oligomers by a complete search of symmetry configuration space, using NMR restraints and van der Waals packing , 2006, Proteins.

[3]  H Oschkinat,et al.  Automated NOESY interpretation with ambiguous distance restraints: the refined NMR solution structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from beta-spectrin. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Pnur BnlqN Moonn,et al.  Solution of the Structure , 2007 .

[5]  C. S. Wang,et al.  AmbiPack: A systematic algorithm for packing of macromolecular structures with ambiguous distance constraints , 1998, Proteins.

[6]  Francesco Fiorito,et al.  Automated Resonance Assignment of Proteins: 6 DAPSY-NMR , 2006, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[7]  Gerhard Wagner,et al.  A SIMPLE METHOD TO DISTINGUISH INTERMONOMER NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECTS IN HOMODIMERIC PROTEINS WITH C2 SYMMETRY , 1997 .

[8]  R. Kammerer,et al.  Heteronuclear NMR assignments and secondary structure of the coiled coil trimerization domain from cartilage matrix protein in oxidized and reduced forms , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  F. Frances Yao,et al.  Computational Geometry , 1991, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume A: Algorithms and Complexity.

[10]  W. M. Westler,et al.  A relational database for sequence-specific protein NMR data , 1991, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[11]  Charles D Schwieters,et al.  Completely automated, highly error-tolerant macromolecular structure determination from multidimensional nuclear overhauser enhancement spectra and chemical shift assignments. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  X-PLOR Version 3.1: A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR , 1992 .

[13]  Peter Güntert,et al.  Automated NMR protein structure calculation , 2003 .

[14]  M Nilges,et al.  A calculation strategy for the structure determination of symmetric demers by 1H NMR , 1993, Proteins.

[15]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Algorithms in Combinatorial Geometry , 1987, EATCS Monographs in Theoretical Computer Science.

[16]  Bruce Randall Donald,et al.  An efficient and accurate algorithm for assigning nuclear overhauser effect restraints using a rotamer library ensemble and residual dipolar couplings , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference (CSB'05).

[17]  Michael Nilges,et al.  Unraveling the symmetry ambiguity in a hexamer: Calculation of the R6 human insulin structure , 2000, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[18]  Torsten Herrmann,et al.  Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Determination of the structure of symmetric coiled-coil proteins from NMR data: application of the leucine zipper proteins Jun and GCN4. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[20]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[21]  N. Meyers,et al.  H = W. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Mark W. Maciejewski,et al.  Structural basis for the topological specificity function of MinE , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[23]  W. Braun,et al.  Automated 2D NOESY assignment and structure calculation of Crambin(S22/I25) with the self-correcting distance geometry based NOAH/DIAMOD programs. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[24]  J. Chou,et al.  The structure of phospholamban pentamer reveals a channel-like architecture in membranes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Jack Greenblatt,et al.  Methods for Measurement of Intermolecular NOEs by Multinuclear NMR Spectroscopy: Application to a Bacteriophage λ N-Peptide/boxB RNA Complex , 1997 .

[26]  A M Gronenborn,et al.  Four-dimensional heteronuclear triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy of interleukin-1 beta in solution. , 1990, Science.

[27]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.